I have not slandered you nor has Vicki. She asked you tough questions to which you gave no meaningful response. I asked you questions to which you gave no meaningful response.

While you are not obligated to respond to questions challenging your views, failure to do so gives evidence that you have no response.

There are many on this forum from whom you could learn something. Thinking is often a painful experience. That is particularly the case when a person substitutes doctrine for discovery. Are you willing to think? Are you willing to challenge doctrines which will not tolerate espouse to fact?

If not, then this is not a good place for you. I am not for a moment suggesting that you leave. Rather, I suggest you accept the challenge of giving genuine “intellectual honesty” to views you may perceive you hold.