Bahman: Front and Center! - Victoria! Mar 18, 18:47, 2003 +43 I'm surprised! - Bahman Mar 18, 19:53, 2003 +1 Re: Events - JAK Mar 18, 21:30, 2003 +1 Don't forget, though. . . - Gunnar Mar 21, 22:42, 2003 +1 In support & in addition - JAK Mar 22, 20:20, 2003 Re: Bahman: Front and Center! - Bahman Mar 18, 22:38, 2003 +2 Re: Bahman: Front and Center! - JAK Mar 18, 22:59, 2003 You are in good company, Bahman - Victoria! Mar 20, 00:36, 2003 BAHMAN FOR PRESIDENT!! (no text) - TLC Mar 19, 07:44, 2003 +1 Re: BAHMAN FOR PRESIDENT!! - Bahman Mar 19, 12:38, 2003 +2 The U.N. for starters (no text) - TLC Mar 19, 18:08, 2003 +1 What is the pay?! (no text) - Bahman Mar 19, 18:14, 2003 Re: President of the U.N...? - JAK Mar 19, 19:38, 2003 +1 WRONG, WRONG!! - Bahman Mar 19, 19:59, 2003 +1 Re: OK, OK - JAK Mar 19, 20:27, 2003 +1 So it begins...NOW - Victoria! Mar 19, 21:08, 2003 +2 Re: So it begins...NOW - JAK Mar 19, 21:21, 2003 +3 Re: So it begins...NOW - ramona Mar 19, 21:24, 2003 +2 Re: So it begins...NOW - JAK Mar 19, 21:36, 2003 The sound of war... - Victoria! Mar 20, 00:21, 2003 +2 A small piece for Ramona - Victoria! Mar 20, 14:29, 2003 +1 Too ethereal for me. nt (no text) - ramona Mar 20, 16:41, 2003 +1 Re: Too REAL for me (no text) - Victoria! Mar 20, 17:10, 2003 Human capacity - JAK Mar 20, 16:39, 2003 +1 God helps those that help themselves. N/t (no text) - ramona Mar 20, 16:42, 2003 +1 Re: God helps those that help themselves. N/t - JAK Mar 20, 17:08, 2003 +2 Re: God helps those that help themselves. - ramona Mar 20, 18:25, 2003 +1 Re: God helps those that help themselves. - JAK Mar 20, 18:43, 2003 +1 As Igor would say, "thank you mahster n/t. (no text) - ramona Mar 20, 19:03, 2003 Re: God helps those that help themselves. N/t - Gunnar Mar 21, 23:51, 2003 +2 Belief in God is - Victoria! Mar 21, 23:55, 2003 Hitler comes to mind - JAK Mar 22, 23:11, 2003 +1 re: my parenthetical phrase - Gunnar Mar 23, 19:50, 2003 +1 Road to evidence and reason - JAK Mar 23, 20:25, 2003 Were my stats wrong? - Victoria! Mar 20, 00:17, 2003 +1 Re: Snow & War - JAK Mar 20, 21:11, 2003 +1 Liberation and Snow Plows - Victoria! Mar 21, 23:39, 2003 +1 The War - JAK Mar 22, 23:32, 2003 death and mayhem in the south of Iraq? - Gunnar Mar 21, 23:24, 2003 +1 Yeah heck - Victoria! Mar 21, 23:47, 2003 Surprize, surprize!! - TLC Mar 20, 07:25, 2003 +2 No surprise at all - Victoria! Mar 20, 13:09, 2003 TLC? - Victoria! Mar 21, 19:49, 2003 +1 Awe , but no shock - TLC Mar 22, 07:48, 2003

RPCMAN a question - ramona Mar 18, 10:54, 2003 +1 probably not - rpcman Mar 18, 14:15, 2003

Make up a religion, name your prophet - james Mar 17, 21:38, 2003 +31 If I were God for a day? - Victoria! Mar 18, 18:24, 2003 +2 Re: If I were God for a day? - ramona Mar 18, 18:56, 2003 +1 Re: If I were God for a day? - JAK Mar 18, 22:01, 2003 In the End, Greedy - JAK Mar 18, 21:56, 2003 +1 Greed - TLC Mar 19, 07:35, 2003 +2 Re: Greed - Bahman Mar 19, 12:48, 2003 +1 Re: Greed - JAK Mar 19, 18:19, 2003 +2 Definition please - Bahman Mar 19, 19:02, 2003 +1 Definitions remain problematic - JAK Mar 19, 19:19, 2003 +1 That's what I thought. Case closed! (no text) - Bahman Mar 19, 20:02, 2003 +1 Actually, the debate will rage on (no text) - JAK Mar 19, 20:30, 2003 +1 Re: Actually, the debate will rage on..... - TLC Mar 21, 19:12, 2003 +1 Re: Actually, the debate will rage on..... - JAK Mar 21, 19:23, 2003 Re: Greed - gottogo Mar 20, 23:47, 2003 +1 Which... - JAK Mar 22, 20:43, 2003 Re: Greed - JAK Mar 19, 18:07, 2003 +1 Re: Greed - Gunnar Mar 22, 12:49, 2003 How does anyone dare......... - TLC Mar 19, 07:13, 2003 +1 :-0 - JAK Mar 19, 18:23, 2003 +1 Re: :-0 - TLC Mar 19, 18:50, 2003 +1 Re: :-0 - JAK Mar 19, 19:30, 2003 +2 Watch it JAK or back to the home you go. ;-) t (no text) - ramona Mar 19, 21:36, 2003 +1 Watch it JAK or back to the home you go. ;-) - JAK Mar 19, 21:48, 2003 +1 JAK, are you having a religious experience? - Victoria! Mar 20, 00:11, 2003 +1 Re: JAK, are you having a religious experience? - JAK Mar 21, 11:18, 2003 Re: :-0 - TLC Mar 20, 08:31, 2003 +1 Re: :-0 - JAK Mar 20, 15:58, 2003 +2 Naw, I say we dump Grandpa JAK in a home. - ramona Mar 20, 16:45, 2003 +1 O (no text) - JAK Mar 20, 22:03, 2003 Re: :-0 - TLC Mar 21, 08:55, 2003 +1 Tlc - ramona Mar 21, 09:10, 2003

polygamy - ramona Mar 17, 17:27, 2003 +40 Reason? - James Mar 17, 17:51, 2003 +2 Re: Reason? - ramona Mar 17, 18:38, 2003 +1 OD 1 - james Mar 17, 19:03, 2003 Re: Reason? - rpcman Mar 17, 19:22, 2003 +1 Oh, ok - james Mar 17, 20:51, 2003 +1 Huh? - Victoria! Mar 18, 18:34, 2003 +1 Cross dressing - james Mar 24, 15:04, 2003 Re: polygamy - nofaith Mar 17, 20:09, 2003 +2 Doctrinal Shift - JAK Mar 17, 20:48, 2003 +1 I'll take Moses for $20, JAK - Victoria! Mar 18, 18:32, 2003 +1 Re: Doctrinal Shift - JAK Mar 18, 21:15, 2003 +1 I doubt - Victoria! Mar 18, 22:41, 2003 +1 Re: I doubt - JAK Mar 18, 22:51, 2003 ...and eventually forgotten, if lucky? - james Mar 17, 20:54, 2003 +2 Not “lucky,” ignorant - JAK Mar 17, 21:17, 2003 +1 About a great many things... - james Mar 17, 21:42, 2003 LDS not lucky, shrewd - Victoria! Mar 18, 18:39, 2003 +2 Re: sanitizing - JAK Mar 18, 22:43, 2003 Perception - james Mar 24, 15:16, 2003 Poly gametes, syngamy - james Mar 17, 21:10, 2003 Bigamy/Polygamy in other cultures - james Mar 17, 21:21, 2003 Re: polygamy - Chad Mar 18, 20:34, 2003 +1 Ho Li Cau :-) - ramona Mar 18, 21:39, 2003 Polygamy, a lot of men's secret desire..... - TLC Mar 19, 08:43, 2003 +3 Re: Polygamy, a lot of men's secret desire..... - Bahman Mar 19, 12:36, 2003 Re: Polygamy, a lot of men's secret desire..... - ramona Mar 19, 15:21, 2003 +2 Re: "certified"? - JAK Mar 19, 18:28, 2003 +1 certifiably nuts? Is that what you wanted to say? - ramona Mar 19, 21:26, 2003 +1 certifiably nuts? Is that what you wanted to say? - JAK Mar 19, 21:44, 2003 Re: Polygamy, a lot of men's secret desire..... - TLC Mar 20, 09:28, 2003 +1 Re: Polygamy, a lot of men's secret desire..... - ramona Mar 20, 10:51, 2003 +1 Serial polygamy........ - TLC Mar 20, 11:41, 2003 +1 Chocolate.said in the donut voice of homer simpson - ramona Mar 20, 18:23, 2003 +1 Re: asparagus, lettus, garlic-Humph! - JAK Mar 20, 18:50, 2003 +1 Hey Yankee!! You sure are greedy. - ramona Mar 20, 19:02, 2003 +1 Re: O - JAK Mar 20, 19:22, 2003 What's wrong with casual sex? - nofaith Mar 19, 20:15, 2003 +1 Sexual jealousy - TLC Mar 20, 07:05, 2003 +1 Or click here for a modern alternative - ramona Mar 20, 18:58, 2003 +1 Wow! - JAK Mar 20, 19:27, 2003

Experimenting with Non-Violence - james Mar 17, 16:06, 2003 +4 Re: Experimenting with Non-Violence - grendel Mar 18, 01:28, 2003 Re: Experimenting with Non-Violence - Chad Mar 18, 20:57, 2003 +1 Reasonable limits of himsa - james Mar 24, 15:35, 2003 Chad is right. - Gunnar Mar 23, 20:13, 2003

Whiskey in a Jar - Jenny Mar 17, 10:13, 2003 +1 I love it!! I'm Irish (no text) - TLC Mar 17, 19:13, 2003

Link to Mitchell's Manifesto - ramona Mar 15, 13:21, 2003 +4 Re: Link to Mitchell's Manifesto - The Vines Mar 16, 12:52, 2003 +1 Re: Link to Mitchell's Manifesto - bosquero Mar 17, 10:05, 2003 Penmanship - james Mar 17, 21:28, 2003 Re: Link to Mitchell's Manifesto - Chad Mar 18, 21:11, 2003

Free will for Bosquero - The Vines Mar 15, 12:04, 2003 +25 Re: Free will for Bosquero - TLC Mar 15, 17:06, 2003 Dependent Origination - james Mar 16, 17:51, 2003 +2 Re: Dependent Origination - TLC Mar 16, 18:28, 2003 +2 Re: environment and heredity - JAK Mar 16, 22:58, 2003 +1 You are correct........ - TLC Mar 17, 06:52, 2003 +1 Re: You are correct........ - JAK Mar 17, 16:30, 2003 Wild humans - james Mar 17, 15:23, 2003 No Choice - JAK Mar 16, 23:00, 2003 +2 (*hits JAK over the head with a Magic Guppy*) (no text) - Another Bob Mar 17, 01:41, 2003 I hope that was a joke! - james Mar 17, 15:28, 2003 +1 Re: just the facts - JAK Mar 17, 16:40, 2003 +1 and now a word from our sponsor.... - James Mar 17, 17:57, 2003 +1 Re: Environment & Heredity - JAK Mar 17, 18:37, 2003 +2 tpumbum-bupum-bupum-bum-bom! - james Mar 17, 20:58, 2003 JAK! - james Mar 17, 21:02, 2003 For TV, Ramona, and FAK(?) - bosquero Mar 17, 09:43, 2003 +2 Re: For TV, Ramona, and FAK(?) - Another Bob Mar 17, 12:56, 2003 +1 Ugarit - bosquero Mar 18, 12:08, 2003 +1 Re: Ugarit - Another Bob Mar 19, 17:33, 2003 +1 Top down - bosquero Mar 20, 13:19, 2003 +1 For Boll Weevil - Another Bob Mar 21, 22:00, 2003 +2 Re: For Boll Weevil - bosquero Mar 27, 13:10, 2003 Re: For Boll Weevil - bosquero Mar 27, 14:23, 2003 Undeterminism - james Mar 17, 15:38, 2003 +1 Bosquero is Boll Weevil - bosquero Mar 18, 12:17, 2003

POP UPS - Victoria! Mar 14, 21:45, 2003 +32 Re: POP UPS - ramona Mar 14, 21:50, 2003 Disable Active X - Fer-de-lance Mar 14, 22:42, 2003 Re: POP UPS - JAK Mar 15, 08:53, 2003 +2 Ah, but wait..the big picture - ramona Mar 15, 12:19, 2003 +1 ...the big picture - JAK Mar 15, 16:26, 2003 +2 er... Let me get this straight - Another Bob Mar 15, 19:05, 2003 +1 Religious mythologies - JAK Mar 15, 19:54, 2003 +1 Re: Religious Mythologies - Another Bob Mar 16, 00:03, 2003 +1 Re: Religious Mythologies - JAK Mar 16, 10:39, 2003 +1 Yet another note on dogma. - Another Bob Mar 16, 19:37, 2003 the bigger picture - ramona Mar 16, 08:19, 2003 +2 Re: the bigger picture - TLC Mar 16, 09:56, 2003 +2 Re: the bigger picture - JAK Mar 16, 10:56, 2003 Re: the bigger picture - ramona Mar 16, 13:06, 2003 +1 I believe in leprechauns....am I mistaken? - TLC Mar 16, 15:20, 2003 +1 Re: I believe in leprechauns....am I mistaken? - ramona Mar 16, 15:29, 2003 +1 Re: I believe in leprechauns....am I mistaken? - TLC Mar 16, 16:15, 2003 Re: the bigger picture - JAK Mar 16, 10:50, 2003 +2 Poppycock!!! - ramona Mar 16, 13:14, 2003 +3 Well stated, but I have often wondered...... - TLC Mar 16, 15:50, 2003 No rejoinder here - JAK Mar 16, 19:54, 2003 Re: Poppycock!!! - james Mar 17, 21:06, 2003 +1 Re:It certainly is - rdl Mar 17, 21:39, 2003 Re: the bigger picture - TLC Mar 16, 15:36, 2003 +1 the picture is getting more narrow - JAK Mar 16, 20:49, 2003 +1 Re: the picture is getting more narrow - Another Bob Mar 16, 21:54, 2003 I wonder - Another Bob Mar 17, 01:45, 2003 Re: POP UPS - TLC Mar 18, 14:51, 2003 +1 Re: My solution - JAK Mar 18, 23:05, 2003 +1 Re: My solution - nofaith Mar 19, 00:19, 2003 +1 Re: My solution - JAK Mar 19, 20:22, 2003 +1 Re: My solution - nofaith Mar 20, 20:10, 2003

Place (Friday Forum Chat) - Victoria! Mar 14, 17:50, 2003 +14 Whilst holding tongue - ramona Mar 14, 18:11, 2003 Re: a bed (I think) - rdl Mar 14, 20:00, 2003 +1 a little country hospital - Victoria! Mar 14, 20:05, 2003 'Bob's Bid on Morbidity' OR 'Bob's Moribund Mind' - Another Bob Mar 14, 21:00, 2003 +1 33 years huh? - Victoria! Mar 14, 21:21, 2003 +2 Re: 33 years huh? - ramona Mar 14, 21:48, 2003 +1 Thank you Ramona - Another Bob Mar 14, 22:46, 2003 +1 Re: Thank you Ramona - ramona Mar 15, 10:32, 2003 I don't seem to have made a fan. - Another Bob Mar 14, 22:43, 2003 Re: Place (Friday Forum Chat) - TLC Mar 16, 16:22, 2003 +2 Re: Place (Friday Forum Chat) - Ramona Mar 16, 17:51, 2003 +1 Michigan not exotic? - TLC Mar 17, 07:22, 2003 Re: Place (Friday Forum Chat) - JAK Mar 16, 21:19, 2003 +1 Re: Place (Friday Forum Chat) - TLC Mar 17, 07:08, 2003

Time - ramona Mar 14, 09:31, 2003 +88 :-) (no text) - JAK Mar 14, 10:46, 2003 +1 Re: :-) - TLC Mar 14, 11:28, 2003 +2 Internet's SMILEY, 90 degrees off (no text) - Bahman Mar 14, 11:47, 2003 +2 Thanks (no text) - TLC Mar 14, 12:36, 2003 Sort of like many on this forum :-| (no text) - JAK Mar 15, 08:40, 2003 +1 Wait JAK, I resemble that remark. ;-) n/t (no text) - ramona Mar 15, 13:23, 2003 Re: :-) - JAK Mar 15, 08:23, 2003 Re: Death clock wrong. - JAK Mar 14, 11:02, 2003 +3 Re: Death clock wrong. - Fer-de-lance Mar 14, 11:15, 2003 Re: Death clock wrong. - TLC Mar 14, 11:17, 2003 No Way - ramona Mar 14, 11:40, 2003 Re: Time - TLC Mar 14, 11:09, 2003 +2 Re: Time - ramona Mar 14, 11:44, 2003 +1 Re: Time - TLC Mar 14, 11:50, 2003 +1 Re: Time - ramona Mar 14, 12:14, 2003 +1 Re: Time - TLC Mar 14, 12:20, 2003 +1 TLC! - Victoria! Mar 14, 17:48, 2003 +2 Re: TLC! - JAK Mar 15, 08:36, 2003 +2 Dear JAK, NO - Victoria! Mar 15, 16:07, 2003 Analysis...read carefully - JAK Mar 15, 16:48, 2003 +2 Re: uh uh (shakes head vigorously) - rdl Mar 15, 17:04, 2003 +1 Shaking head could be dangerous - JAK Mar 15, 17:59, 2003 +1 ;-) - rdl Mar 15, 18:14, 2003 +1 ;- (no text) - JAK Mar 15, 19:03, 2003 +1 give it up, JAK! - Victoria! Mar 15, 19:14, 2003 JAK, hold my hand - Victoria! Mar 15, 18:13, 2003 +1 No you weren't - ramona Mar 15, 18:22, 2003 +1 Look, you shameless tart - Victoria! Mar 15, 18:24, 2003 +1 I'm a sweet Tart - ramona Mar 15, 18:25, 2003 +1 Are you breaking up with me? (no text) - Victoria! Mar 15, 18:27, 2003 +1 Re: Are you breaking up with me? - ramona Mar 15, 18:32, 2003 +1 Wench, I will burn - Victoria! Mar 15, 18:51, 2003 +1 bring out you wares wench - ramona Mar 15, 18:57, 2003 +1 My wares and my tools - Victoria! Mar 15, 19:03, 2003 +1 Re: My wares and my tools - ramona Mar 15, 19:14, 2003 +1 Re: My wares and my tools - Victoria! Mar 15, 19:16, 2003 +1 Re: My wares and my tools - ramona Mar 15, 19:27, 2003 +1 Re: My wares and my tools - Victoria! Mar 15, 19:30, 2003 I misread the post........ - TLC Mar 15, 15:54, 2003 +1 Pete's sake - Victoria! Mar 15, 16:09, 2003 +1 OK OK I'ts all clear now................Sorry (no text) - TLC Mar 15, 16:24, 2003 +1 :-) - JAK Mar 15, 19:14, 2003 +1 What good are your promises? - Victoria! Mar 15, 19:20, 2003 +1 The study of... - JAK Mar 15, 20:46, 2003 +1 Victoria, consider yourself spanked. n/t (no text) - ramona Mar 16, 09:19, 2003 +2 Are you attempting to cause trouble? (no text) - JAK Mar 16, 11:12, 2003 +1 OF COURSE!! Don't I always? n/t (no text) - ramona Mar 16, 13:15, 2003 Was that an overture, tart? nt (no text) - Victoria! Mar 16, 14:51, 2003 Re: Time - Another Bob Mar 14, 20:42, 2003 +1 Even better than that....... - TLC Mar 16, 17:58, 2003 +1 Even better than that....... - Another Bob Mar 16, 19:42, 2003 +1 Improbability of existence - TLC Mar 18, 15:25, 2003 +2 Re: watchmaker... - rdl Mar 18, 17:08, 2003 +1 Re: watchmaker... - TLC Mar 19, 09:53, 2003 +1 Re: yes indeed - rdl Mar 19, 17:48, 2003 +1 On comprehending the universe - Gunnar Mar 22, 01:00, 2003 +2 Douglas Adams (no text) - rdl Mar 22, 07:05, 2003 It's the trip that........ - TLC Mar 22, 08:05, 2003 Re: Improbability of existence - Bahman Mar 18, 19:59, 2003 +3 Re: Improbability of existence - JAK Mar 18, 22:13, 2003 +1 I'm confused - Bahman Mar 18, 22:44, 2003 +1 Re: The Notion - JAK Mar 18, 23:21, 2003 +2 Still confused. - Bahman Mar 19, 00:12, 2003 +1 Re: Clarification. - JAK Mar 19, 19:00, 2003 Enter Phenomenology - Another Bob Mar 20, 20:43, 2003 Re: Improbability of existence - TLC Mar 19, 09:28, 2003 Re: Improbability of existence - Fer-de-lance Mar 20, 22:30, 2003 +2 Stalemate? - Bahman Mar 20, 22:49, 2003 +1 Re: Stalemate? - Fer-de-lance Mar 20, 23:57, 2003 Endless regression........ - TLC Mar 21, 08:22, 2003 +1 Discovery alters Doctrine - JAK Mar 21, 12:22, 2003 +1 Re: Discovery alters Doctrine - TLC Mar 21, 15:32, 2003 +2 premonition - ramona Mar 21, 18:34, 2003 +1 Re: predictable? - JAK Mar 21, 19:52, 2003 +1 Oh my heavens - ramona Mar 21, 20:23, 2003 +1 Re: Oh my heavens - JAK Mar 21, 21:17, 2003 Re: Discovery alters Doctrine - JAK Mar 21, 19:46, 2003 This is what I want to know... - Victoria! Mar 14, 17:46, 2003 +1 Re: This is what I want to know... - TLC Mar 16, 16:37, 2003 +2 Re: O - JAK Mar 16, 21:05, 2003 +2 The mystery of the missing handles, JAK - Victoria! Mar 17, 16:40, 2003 Re: O - ramona Mar 17, 18:41, 2003 +1 Re: O - JAK Mar 17, 18:55, 2003 +1 JAK, you can be such a goober. :-) n/t (no text) - ramona Mar 17, 19:22, 2003 Sorry to hear about your brother, but - Victoria! Mar 17, 16:28, 2003 +1 Re: Addiction vs. supernatural - JAK Mar 17, 17:48, 2003 +1 Re: Addiction vs. supernatural - ramona Mar 18, 13:28, 2003 +1 O :-) (no text) - JAK Mar 18, 21:20, 2003

Duct tape shows up again, but . . . - Bahman Mar 13, 12:09, 2003 +43 Re: Duct tape shows up again, but . . . - TLC Mar 14, 07:52, 2003 +1 Another thing amazing: French things! - Bahman Mar 14, 09:09, 2003 +1 Re: Another thing amazing: French things! - TLC Mar 14, 10:09, 2003 +2 Pain AND Loss - Bahman Mar 14, 11:45, 2003 +1 Re: Pain AND Loss - TLC Mar 14, 12:11, 2003 +1 PLUS, peaceful alternatives haven't been exhausted (no text) - Bahman Mar 14, 12:29, 2003 +1 Bahman, I think - Victoria! Mar 14, 17:55, 2003 +1 Re: Bahman, I think - Bahman Mar 14, 18:35, 2003 +2 Re: are they inviting Chirac? - rdl Mar 14, 19:58, 2003 +1 Re: are they inviting Chirac? - Bahman Mar 14, 21:19, 2003 +1 Re: :-( - rdl Mar 14, 21:45, 2003 +1 Now seriously . . . - Bahman Mar 14, 23:26, 2003 +1 Re: Now seriously . . . - rdl Mar 15, 06:11, 2003 +1 AMEN! AMEN! (no text) - Bahman Mar 15, 10:09, 2003 It WAS a compliment! - Victoria! Mar 14, 20:09, 2003 +1 Re: It WAS a compliment! - Bahman Mar 14, 21:29, 2003 +1 Addendum - Bahman Mar 14, 21:33, 2003 Re: Another thing amazing: French things! - Another Bob Mar 14, 20:15, 2003 +3 Uh, okay... - Victoria! Mar 14, 20:21, 2003 +1 Bob's Fumigations Inc, we also kill your roaches. - Another Bob Mar 14, 21:13, 2003 +2 Good for you - Victoria! Mar 14, 21:34, 2003 +1 Re: Good for you - Another Bob Mar 14, 22:30, 2003 Arrogant Americans - JAK Mar 16, 22:50, 2003 +3 Re: Arrogant Americans - Another Bob Mar 17, 01:25, 2003 +1 Re: Arrogant Americans - JAK Mar 17, 16:44, 2003 To both JAK and ALSO BOB - TLC Mar 17, 08:58, 2003 +3 To TLC, in tribute. - Another Bob Mar 17, 11:15, 2003 +1 There is no right or wrong.......... - TLC Mar 17, 19:21, 2003 Re: To both JAK and ALSO BOB - Aaron V. Mar 17, 13:38, 2003 +1 America, Americans & World perceptions - JAK Mar 17, 18:25, 2003 +1 Very true... - Aaron V. Mar 17, 21:55, 2003 Re: Connection to the cultural - JAK Mar 17, 18:01, 2003 +1 My apologies to you Sir (no text) - TLC Mar 17, 19:05, 2003 +1 Re: My apologies to you Sir - JAK Mar 17, 20:58, 2003 Don't confuse confidence and competence..... - TLC Mar 17, 09:40, 2003 +1 Re: I wouldn't - JAK Mar 17, 18:52, 2003 From a country that rules itself - ramona Mar 14, 21:57, 2003 Uhem yourself , Mr. all knowing wise one!! - TLC Mar 16, 17:38, 2003 +2 I say...and we all know that I know everything - Ramona Mar 16, 17:54, 2003 +1 Re: I say...and we all know that I know everything - Another Bob Mar 16, 22:10, 2003 Uhem yourself , Mr. all knowing wise one!! - Another Bob Mar 16, 20:24, 2003 +1 Re: Uhem yourself , Mr. all knowing wise one!! - TLC Mar 17, 08:00, 2003 +1 Touche (no text) - Another Bob Mar 19, 17:30, 2003

Baptism for the dead. - ramona Mar 12, 18:20, 2003 +14 I'll give it a go - Victoria! Mar 12, 18:49, 2003 +1 Re: I'll give it a go - ramona Mar 12, 19:06, 2003 +1 no go, don't know - Victoria! Mar 12, 23:42, 2003 +1 It seems to me... - Gehenna Mar 13, 03:45, 2003 Re: Baptism for the dead. - amy Mar 13, 10:31, 2003 +1 Re: Baptism for the dead. - Fer-de-lance Mar 13, 13:57, 2003 +1 Re: Baptism for the dead. - amy Mar 13, 14:36, 2003 +2 Re: Baptism for the dead. - Fer-de-lance Mar 13, 14:57, 2003 A question - Victoria! Mar 13, 21:51, 2003 +2 Re: A question - Fer-de-lance Mar 14, 01:15, 2003 +1 Fer, calm down - Victoria! Mar 14, 17:57, 2003 +1 Re: Fer, calm down - Fer-de-lance Mar 14, 22:46, 2003 Re: A question - amy Mar 14, 15:04, 2003 +1 There ya go - ramona Mar 14, 15:43, 2003

Elizabeth Smart found alive in Sandy. N.t. (no text) - ramona Mar 12, 16:45, 2003 +75 Re: It’s a Miracle! - JAK Mar 12, 17:57, 2003 +5 Come on... - nofaith Mar 12, 18:06, 2003 +2 I'm also glad that we've something else to talk ab (no text) - Bahman Mar 12, 18:36, 2003 +1 I agree with you Bahman - TLC Mar 12, 20:58, 2003 +3 Am I delusional or what?! - Bahman Mar 12, 21:47, 2003 +2 Re: Optimistic - JAK Mar 12, 22:23, 2003 +1 Are you among the slim gathering? - Bahman Mar 12, 22:54, 2003 +2 Bahman, Sir Bahman - Victoria! Mar 12, 23:45, 2003 +1 I stand guilty also for out of topic responses (no text) - TLC Mar 14, 10:43, 2003 +1 Committee... - JAK Mar 14, 10:53, 2003 Poor hopeless innocent. - Another Bob Mar 14, 21:36, 2003 Re: Am I delusional or what?! - TLC Mar 14, 09:17, 2003 +1 A simple question - Bahman Mar 14, 09:33, 2003 +1