Re: Is the other...? - angelica May 09, 05:39, 2003 +1 Hello Angelica - Nigel May 09, 15:13, 2003

To all atheists! - Bahman Apr 27, 18:44, 2003 +92 Not to my knowledge - james Apr 27, 18:54, 2003 +1 Re: Not to my knowledge - Bahman Apr 27, 19:02, 2003 +4 Duh :) - Victoria! Apr 27, 19:29, 2003 +1 Double Duh :) - Bahman Apr 27, 19:41, 2003 +2 Triple Duh ;-) - Victoria! Apr 27, 19:42, 2003 +1 Duhhhhh?! Unprovable today, provable tomorrow? (no text) - Bahman Apr 27, 19:44, 2003 +2 Wellllll DUH, Bahman! - Victoria! Apr 27, 19:46, 2003 +1 No so fast! - Bahman Apr 27, 19:54, 2003 +1 Don't have a cow, Bahman - Victoria! Apr 27, 20:04, 2003 +1 You didn't take my PS seriously, did you? (no text) - Bahman Apr 27, 20:49, 2003 +1 No Bahman, I didn't - Victoria! Apr 27, 22:12, 2003 +1 Thank God! (no text) - Bahman Apr 27, 22:19, 2003 +1 Re: Thank God! - Victoria! Apr 27, 22:34, 2003 +1 How long is 'a while'? (no text) - Bahman Apr 27, 23:40, 2003 +1 Re: How long is 'a while'? - Victoria! Apr 27, 23:56, 2003 +1 I want to know how long my suffering will last (no text) - Bahman Apr 28, 00:01, 2003 +1 Re: I want to know how long my suffering will last - Victoria! Apr 28, 00:02, 2003 +1 I'm becoming . . . - Bahman Apr 28, 00:17, 2003 +1 Bahman, your English is good - Victoria! Apr 28, 00:22, 2003 +1 You don't want to tell us how long, do you? (no text) - Bahman Apr 28, 00:38, 2003 +1 Re: You don't want to tell us how long, do you? - Victoria! Apr 28, 00:45, 2003 +1 Happy Trails, Bahman - Victoria! Apr 28, 01:51, 2003 +3 Re: Happy Trails, Victoria - JAK Apr 28, 02:13, 2003 Re: Happy Trails, Bahman - TLC Apr 28, 09:05, 2003 Re: Happy Trails, Bahman - Bahman Apr 28, 10:00, 2003 +1 Re: Happy Trails, Bahman - TLC Apr 28, 10:53, 2003 +1 And you doubted your poetic skill?! (no text) - Bahman Apr 28, 12:53, 2003 Good you phrased as question - JAK Apr 27, 22:22, 2003 +1 Re: Good you phrased as question - Bahman Apr 27, 22:30, 2003 +1 Re: Good you phrased as question - JAK Apr 27, 23:04, 2003 +2 Are you saying non-physical has been disproved? (no text) - Bahman Apr 27, 23:37, 2003 +2 No, the non-physical has NOT been disproved - Victoria! Apr 28, 00:36, 2003 +1 Most interesting - Bahman Apr 28, 01:49, 2003 +1 Re: Most interesting - Victoria! Apr 28, 01:55, 2003 +1 Craig, can you elaborate? (no text) - Bahman Apr 28, 09:52, 2003 +1 Re: Craig, can you elaborate? - Craig C. Apr 28, 10:51, 2003 +1 Thanks (no text) - Bahman Apr 28, 12:49, 2003 Are you saying non-physical has been disproved? - JAK Apr 28, 01:32, 2003 But JAK, - Victoria! Apr 28, 00:29, 2003 +1 Point of relevancy - JAK Apr 28, 01:46, 2003 "What then?" - JAK Apr 27, 21:39, 2003 +1 What I meant . . . - Bahman Apr 27, 22:25, 2003 +2 Re: What I meant . . . - JAK Apr 27, 23:23, 2003 +1 If you were . . . - Bahman Apr 27, 23:44, 2003 +1 Re: If you were . . . - JAK Apr 28, 01:02, 2003 No, that wasn't my assertion - Victoria! Apr 27, 23:58, 2003 +2 I'm not arguing . . . - Bahman Apr 28, 00:13, 2003 +2 Close, but no cigar Monica - Victoria! Apr 28, 00:18, 2003 +1 Cigar it is! (no text) - Bahman Apr 28, 00:36, 2003 The exclusive "or" - JAK Apr 28, 01:12, 2003 On looking like idiot. - JAK Apr 28, 01:08, 2003 +1 What a crummy remark, apparently - Victoria! Apr 28, 01:11, 2003 +1 Unsure of your meaning - JAK Apr 28, 01:58, 2003 Evidence & Conclusions - JAK Apr 27, 21:21, 2003 +1 Can you put it in a nutshell please? (no text) - Bahman Apr 27, 22:27, 2003 +1 Re: Can you put it in a nutshell please? - JAK Apr 30, 21:00, 2003 +1 ?????!!!!! (no text) - Bahman Apr 30, 21:55, 2003 +1 Re: Evidence & Conclusions - JAK Apr 30, 23:00, 2003 It depends on how one defines "natural" - Gunnar May 01, 09:16, 2003 +1 Modify - Bahman May 01, 10:01, 2003 +1 Non-physical? - Gunnar May 05, 01:20, 2003 No evidence/disbelief - james May 04, 17:45, 2003 Re: To all atheists! - Fer-de-lance Apr 28, 00:36, 2003 +2 Re: To all atheists! - Bahman Apr 28, 00:48, 2003 +1 Re: To all atheists! - Fer-de-lance Apr 29, 01:07, 2003 +1 Hunch . . . - Bahman Apr 29, 11:10, 2003 +2 Re: Hunch . . . - JAK Apr 29, 20:41, 2003 +1 Re: Hunch . . . - TLC Apr 30, 07:26, 2003 +1 Re: Hunch . . . - JAK Apr 30, 20:56, 2003 Re: Hunch . . . - Fer-de-lance Apr 30, 14:14, 2003 +2 Re: Hunch . . . - TLC Apr 30, 14:36, 2003 Re: Hunch . . . - JAK Apr 30, 21:07, 2003 But Fer - Victoria! Apr 28, 00:51, 2003 +2 Fer, what do you think would happen - Victoria! Apr 28, 01:13, 2003 +3 Re: Fer, what do you think would happen - JAK Apr 28, 02:05, 2003 Re: Fer, what do you think would happen - TLC Apr 28, 09:28, 2003 Re: Fer, what do you think would happen - Fer-de-lance Apr 29, 01:14, 2003 Re: But Fer - Fer-de-lance Apr 29, 01:10, 2003 Re: To all atheists! - TLC Apr 28, 08:42, 2003 +2 We're all like Hamsters......... - TLC Apr 28, 09:51, 2003 +2 Re: We're all like Hamsters......... - Bahman Apr 28, 10:19, 2003 +2 Re: We're all like Hamsters......... - TLC Apr 28, 11:06, 2003 +1 Yes . . . - Bahman Apr 28, 12:39, 2003 We get better - JAK Apr 28, 21:49, 2003 We are unlikely to agree - JAK Apr 28, 21:39, 2003 I'm surprised! - Bahman Apr 28, 10:14, 2003 +1 Re: I'm surprised! - TLC Apr 28, 10:42, 2003 +1 Some answers - Bahman Apr 28, 12:48, 2003 +1 Re: Some answers - JAK Apr 28, 22:06, 2003 Re: To all atheists! - Artem Apr 28, 15:51, 2003 +1 Nicely put - Bahman Apr 28, 16:40, 2003 +1 Re: Nicely put - Artem Apr 28, 17:21, 2003

To Craig & others: about Lamarck - Bahman Apr 27, 17:52, 2003 +19 Re: To Craig & others: about Lamarck - Craig C. Apr 27, 18:08, 2003 +1 2 questions for now! - Bahman Apr 27, 18:51, 2003 +1 Re: 2 questions for now! - Craig C. Apr 27, 19:17, 2003 +1 One question - Bahman Apr 27, 19:37, 2003 +1 Re: One question - Craig C. Apr 27, 19:59, 2003 +1 Another - Bahman Apr 27, 20:04, 2003 +1 Re: Another - Craig C. Apr 27, 20:14, 2003 +1 Running out of titles! - Bahman Apr 27, 22:17, 2003 +2 Re: Running out of titles! - Craig C. Apr 27, 22:37, 2003 +1 Qestion # ? - Bahman Apr 27, 23:58, 2003 +1 Re: Qestion # ? - Craig C. Apr 28, 01:13, 2003 +1 Re: good - JAK Apr 28, 02:11, 2003 +1 Re: good - Craig C. Apr 28, 08:32, 2003 +2 Re: good - Bahman Apr 28, 10:28, 2003 Exactly so! - JAK Apr 28, 20:51, 2003 Piano & Genes - JAK Apr 27, 22:51, 2003 +1 In short . . . - Bahman Apr 27, 23:50, 2003 +1 Beware over-simplification - JAK Apr 28, 00:51, 2003 +1 Re: Beware over-simplification - TLC Apr 28, 10:13, 2003

Dammit, where's the salt - Another Bob Apr 27, 02:34, 2003

Question for TBM's and exTBM's about BoM - Glen Apr 26, 16:15, 2003 +50 Praise Allah - Another Bob Apr 26, 18:53, 2003 +1 Re: Praise Allah - Glen Apr 26, 19:27, 2003 +2 you're right, of course - sansfoy Apr 26, 19:31, 2003 +1 Yes and no - Glen Apr 26, 19:54, 2003 +1 One opinion - TLC Apr 26, 21:34, 2003 +2 Dancing - Victoria! Apr 26, 21:59, 2003 +2 Re: Dancing - Another Bob Apr 26, 22:26, 2003 +1 Re: Dancing - TLC Apr 26, 23:49, 2003 +1 Re: Dancing - Another Bob Apr 26, 23:55, 2003 Re: Dancing - TLC Apr 26, 23:57, 2003 +2 I'm afraid - Victoria! Apr 27, 00:43, 2003 +1 Re: I'm afraid - TLC Apr 27, 02:04, 2003 Try this - JAK Apr 27, 00:52, 2003 Re: Thinking with you - JAK Apr 27, 00:21, 2003 Re: Praise Allah - Another Bob Apr 26, 21:17, 2003 +1 I've got to jump in! - Bahman Apr 26, 21:25, 2003 +1 Re: I've got to jump in! - Another Bob Apr 26, 22:02, 2003 +1 I'm surprised! - Bahman Apr 26, 22:51, 2003 +2 Re: I'm surprised! - Another Bob Apr 26, 23:13, 2003 The argument from a different tack - Another Bob Apr 26, 23:49, 2003 +1 Let's focus on one thing at a time - Bahman Apr 27, 00:14, 2003 +2 Re: Let's focus on one thing at a time - JAK Apr 27, 01:02, 2003 +1 All warm and fuzzy whats - Another Bob Apr 27, 01:18, 2003 Lest we put ourselves in danger of technicolor. - Another Bob Apr 27, 01:10, 2003 +2 Re: Lest we put ourselves in danger of technicol - Bahman Apr 27, 01:29, 2003 +1 Re: Lest we put ourselves in danger of technicolor - Another Bob Apr 27, 02:45, 2003 +1 Forget evrything else and . . . - Bahman Apr 27, 11:27, 2003 +1 Re: Forget everything else and . . . - Another Bob Apr 27, 19:45, 2003 great post title, AB! (no text) - Victoria! Apr 27, 14:29, 2003 +2 Oh, the Queen of . . . - Bahman Apr 27, 15:25, 2003 +2 I liked your creative post title, AB - Victoria! Apr 27, 15:28, 2003 +1 I want translation - Bahman Apr 27, 15:31, 2003 +1 Re: I want translation - Another Bob Apr 27, 19:51, 2003 +2 Thanks (no text) - Bahman Apr 27, 19:58, 2003 See, I was wrong! - Victoria! Apr 27, 20:29, 2003 Authorship and guilt - Victoria! Apr 27, 16:05, 2003 +1 Author! Author! (no text) - Bahman Apr 27, 16:10, 2003 +1 guilt driven hint - Victoria! Apr 27, 16:18, 2003 Thank you Victoria (no text) - Another Bob Apr 27, 19:48, 2003 Re: Question for TBM's and exTBM's about BoM - Craig C. Apr 26, 19:04, 2003 +1 Thanks, Craig - Glen Apr 26, 19:31, 2003 +1 Re: Thanks, Craig - Craig C. Apr 26, 22:47, 2003 Re: Question for TBM's and exTBM's about BoM - sansfoy Apr 26, 19:35, 2003 +1 But I think what Glen is looking for - Victoria! Apr 26, 20:13, 2003 Re: Question for TBM's and exTBM's about BoM - nofaith Apr 27, 14:11, 2003 +1 Thanks for answering, Dan - Glen Apr 27, 18:39, 2003 +1 Re: Thanks for answering, Dan - nofaith Apr 28, 04:04, 2003 +2 Thanks for answering, Dan (no text) - Another Bob Apr 28, 04:08, 2003 Great response! (no text) - Craig C. Apr 28, 14:17, 2003 Your getting warm! - james Apr 27, 18:45, 2003

Baby & Bathwater - Bahman Apr 25, 17:58, 2003 +58 Re: Baby & Bathwater - Fer-de-lance Apr 25, 18:24, 2003 +2 Re: Baby & Bathwater - JAK Apr 25, 19:18, 2003 +1 Re: Baby & Bathwater - Fer-de-lance Apr 25, 21:52, 2003 Clarify please - Bahman Apr 25, 19:34, 2003 +1 Re: Clarify please - Fer-de-lance Apr 25, 21:23, 2003 +1 Down to earth! - Bahman Apr 25, 22:08, 2003 Re: Baby & Bathwater - JAK Apr 25, 19:09, 2003 +1 Baby = Bathwater! - Bahman Apr 25, 19:24, 2003 Re: Baby & Bathwater - Victoria! Apr 25, 20:52, 2003 +1 I suppose duh = no! (no text) - Bahman Apr 25, 20:58, 2003 +1 Bahman I think you're wonderful! - Victoria! Apr 25, 21:00, 2003 +2 You have just the right - Victoria! Apr 25, 21:04, 2003 +1 Thanks but . . . - Bahman Apr 25, 21:44, 2003 +1 I meant every word - Victoria! Apr 25, 22:28, 2003 +1 Thanks again. Can I tell my wife?! (no text) - Bahman Apr 25, 23:25, 2003 +1 Yes! Download the post! (no text) - Victoria! Apr 25, 23:28, 2003 +1 Maybe I should sleep on it first!! (no text) - Bahman Apr 25, 23:33, 2003 +1 The post? (no text) - Victoria! Apr 25, 23:45, 2003 +1 Figuraitively speaking! (no text) - Bahman Apr 26, 00:58, 2003 But I'm not . . . - Bahman Apr 25, 21:58, 2003 +1 Do you want a direct answer? (no text) - Victoria! Apr 25, 22:25, 2003 +1 Re: Do you want a direct answer? - Bahman Apr 25, 23:31, 2003 +1 Re: Do you want a direct answer? - Victoria! Apr 25, 23:55, 2003 +1 Well put - Bahman Apr 26, 00:55, 2003 Re: Baby & Bathwater - TLC Apr 26, 12:58, 2003 +1 Your God? - Bahman Apr 26, 18:17, 2003 +1 Re: Your God? - TLC Apr 26, 20:41, 2003 +1 Questions - Bahman Apr 26, 21:33, 2003 +1 Re: Questions - TLC Apr 27, 00:32, 2003 +2 Exactly - Victoria! Apr 27, 01:07, 2003 +1 Re: Exactly - Bahman Apr 27, 02:08, 2003 +1 Re: Exactly - TLC Apr 27, 17:30, 2003 +2 That's your opinion, of course. Others' differ (no text) - Bahman Apr 27, 17:48, 2003 +1 Of course it is an opinion........ - TLC Apr 28, 10:04, 2003 Talking with the Indoctrinated Person - JAK Apr 28, 21:22, 2003 Re: Questions - Bahman Apr 27, 02:00, 2003 Re: Baby & Bathwater - Craig C. Apr 26, 14:18, 2003 +2 Re: Baby & Bathwater - TLC Apr 26, 15:05, 2003 +1 Woops! - Craig C. Apr 26, 18:52, 2003 +1 Re: Woops! - TLC Apr 26, 20:26, 2003 Rubber ducky? - Bahman Apr 26, 18:29, 2003 +1 Re: Rubber ducky? - Craig C. Apr 26, 18:59, 2003 +1 I'm not a convert! - Bahman Apr 26, 20:02, 2003 +1 Re: I'm not a convert! - TLC Apr 26, 21:01, 2003 +3 Reincarnation - Bahman Apr 26, 21:49, 2003 +2 Why do you say that? - Victoria! Apr 26, 22:09, 2003 +1 Re: Why do you say that? - Bahman Apr 26, 22:57, 2003 Re: Reincarnation - TLC Apr 27, 00:22, 2003 +1 Some answers - Bahman Apr 27, 01:44, 2003 Floodier and floodier - Victoria! Apr 26, 22:04, 2003 +1 Thinning the herd - TLC Apr 26, 22:47, 2003 +2 Re: Thinning the herd - JAK Apr 26, 23:09, 2003 Good ideas - Victoria! Apr 27, 00:52, 2003 +2 Re: Good ideas - JAK Apr 27, 01:14, 2003 Re: Good ideas - Craig C. May 04, 18:42, 2003 +1 Re: Good ideas - Victoria! May 04, 23:41, 2003 +1 dark matter and dark energy - Craig C. May 05, 01:10, 2003 "never heard of Zoroastrianism" - JAK Apr 26, 23:45, 2003

Is classless society even desirable? - Bahman Apr 23, 15:10, 2003 +21 Re: Is classless society even desirable? - Fer-de-lance Apr 23, 16:18, 2003 +1 Thurstein Veblen? - Bahman Apr 23, 16:29, 2003 +2 Re: Thurstein Veblen? - TLC Apr 23, 16:55, 2003 +2 Yes, most people can do that in a democracy (no text) - Bahman Apr 23, 19:43, 2003 Re: Thurstein Veblen? - JAK Apr 23, 21:50, 2003 +1 Re: Thurstein Veblen? - TLC Apr 23, 22:18, 2003 Re: Thurstein Veblen? - Fer-de-lance Apr 23, 18:23, 2003 +1 Re: Thurstein Veblen? - Bahman Apr 23, 19:49, 2003 And yet... - JAK Apr 23, 23:04, 2003 +3 My Goodness, JAK........ - TLC Apr 23, 23:21, 2003 +1 :-) (no text) - JAK Apr 24, 00:00, 2003 Re: And yet... - Bahman Apr 23, 23:27, 2003 +2 Re: And yet... - JAK Apr 24, 00:05, 2003 +1 Like you haven't heard of 'belief'? (no text) - Bahman Apr 24, 00:35, 2003 +1 You don't get it, Bahman - Victoria! Apr 24, 00:40, 2003 +1 JAK has got to answer that, I'm going to bed! (no text) - Bahman Apr 24, 00:46, 2003 So Bahman, - Victoria! Apr 24, 00:29, 2003 +1 I don't follow you! (no text) - Bahman Apr 24, 00:36, 2003 Re: And yet... - Fer-de-lance Apr 24, 01:21, 2003 Re: Is classless society even desirable? - Phoebus Apr 24, 06:25, 2003 +1 One class society - Bahman Apr 24, 13:51, 2003

Future of Iraq - nofaith Apr 23, 14:36, 2003 +9 Re: Future of Iraq - Bahman Apr 23, 15:15, 2003 +1 Re: Future of Iraq - TLC Apr 23, 16:38, 2003 +2 I agree, but . . . - Bahman Apr 23, 16:46, 2003 +1 Re: I agree, but . . . - TLC Apr 23, 17:13, 2003 +1 Something to think about - Bahman Apr 23, 19:54, 2003 Re: Future of Iraq - sansfoy Apr 23, 17:23, 2003 +2 There are exceptions - Bahman Apr 23, 20:01, 2003 +1 Re: There are exceptions - sansfoy Apr 23, 20:31, 2003 Re: Future of Iraq - TLC Apr 23, 22:13, 2003

Giving a Talk and Need Input - sansfoy Apr 22, 18:58, 2003 +32 Re: Giving a Talk and Need Input - rdl Apr 22, 21:27, 2003 +1 Re: Giving a Talk and Need Input - sansfoy Apr 23, 05:59, 2003 What a surprise, it's sansfoy ;-) - Victoria! Apr 22, 23:14, 2003 +1 Re: What a surprise, it's sansfoy ;-) - sansfoy Apr 23, 06:02, 2003 +2 My 2cents! - Bahman Apr 23, 12:02, 2003 +1 tell me more - sansfoy Apr 23, 12:09, 2003 +1 Re: tell me more - Bahman Apr 23, 12:32, 2003 +1 Re: tell me more - JAK Apr 24, 20:48, 2003 +1 Does it really matter? (no text) - Bahman Apr 24, 21:35, 2003 +1 Re: Does it really matter? - JAK Apr 24, 22:07, 2003 +1 I didn't mean to be evasive - Bahman Apr 24, 23:02, 2003 Why an afterlife anyway? - Victoria! Apr 24, 00:20, 2003 +1 Re: Why an afterlife anyway? - Bahman Apr 24, 00:41, 2003 +1 Why not look forward to it? - Victoria! Apr 24, 00:47, 2003 +2 Re: Why not look forward to it? - Craig C. Apr 24, 11:28, 2003 +1 Re: Why not look forward to it? - Victoria! Apr 24, 20:18, 2003 +1 carpe diem - Craig C. Apr 25, 00:37, 2003 +1 nostalgia - Victoria! Apr 25, 20:56, 2003 +1 Have you considered writing it down? - sansfoy Apr 26, 06:57, 2003 +1 I HAVE been writing it down - Victoria! Apr 26, 17:04, 2003 +1 Zarahemla City Limits (no text) - sansfoy Apr 26, 17:29, 2003 +1 so, what about it Sans? (no text) - Victoria! Apr 26, 17:33, 2003 +1 oops - sansfoy Apr 26, 19:29, 2003 +1 two things - Victoria! Apr 26, 20:20, 2003 +1 Re: two things - sansfoy Apr 27, 05:25, 2003 Not anxious to go! - Bahman Apr 24, 14:02, 2003 Re: Giving a Talk and Need Input - TLC Apr 23, 08:24, 2003 Re: Giving a Talk and Need Input - Fer-de-lance Apr 23, 16:26, 2003 +1 Jumping in! - Bahman Apr 23, 16:38, 2003 Hey Sansfoy! - Cal Apr 23, 20:46, 2003 Unitarian testimony meeting - Alf Omega Apr 24, 11:27, 2003 Thanks for the Responses - sansfoy Apr 24, 18:58, 2003

The Critical Hunt - JAK Apr 21, 20:55, 2003 +11 shhhhhh - rdl Apr 22, 21:44, 2003 Re: The Critical Hunt - TLC Apr 23, 22:45, 2003 +1 Re: The Critical Hunt - JAK Apr 23, 23:54, 2003 +1 You took me too seriously - TLC Apr 24, 10:07, 2003 +1 Re: You seemed serious - JAK Apr 24, 21:56, 2003 +1 Jumping in - Bahman Apr 25, 00:14, 2003 +2 Re: Jumping in - grendel Apr 25, 12:08, 2003 +2 Thanks. Nice to see you back (no text) - Bahman Apr 25, 14:49, 2003 Re: Jumping in - JAK Apr 25, 18:55, 2003 Comparing death and destruction - JAK Apr 25, 18:41, 2003 +1 We'll have to agree to disagree (no text) - Bahman Apr 25, 19:28, 2003

Plastic surgery taken to new level - james Apr 21, 20:40, 2003 +5 Re: Plastic surgery taken to new level - TLC Apr 22, 09:56, 2003 +1 Yes, good question indeed - james Apr 27, 18:27, 2003 James, it seems that......... - TLC Apr 23, 22:34, 2003 +1 Crudely put, it is man's quest - Victoria! Apr 24, 00:25, 2003 +1 Re: Crudeness indeed!! - TLC Apr 24, 08:48, 2003

"The War Channel" ? - TLC Apr 21, 08:50, 2003 +3 Re: "The War Channel" ? - Phoebus Apr 21, 19:53, 2003 +1 Re: The Sport - JAK Apr 21, 20:21, 2003 Re: "The War Channel" ? - JAK Apr 21, 20:12, 2003

In truth George The second? - Another Bob Apr 21, 08:27, 2003 +42 Get a grip ! - TLC Apr 21, 09:48, 2003 +1 Re: Get a grip ! - Another Bob Apr 21, 16:42, 2003 +1 Re: Get a grip ! - TLC Apr 22, 12:14, 2003 +2 Where's a good wrench when you need one. - another bob Apr 22, 13:54, 2003 Re: Get a grip ! - Phoebus Apr 22, 14:53, 2003 +2 War Logic and Nationalism - Phoebus Apr 22, 16:44, 2003 To both Another Bob and Phoebus - TLC Apr 22, 22:30, 2003 +2 Freedom - Phoebus Apr 23, 02:17, 2003 +2 Re: Freedom - TLC Apr 23, 09:40, 2003 +2 Re: Freedom - Phoebus Apr 23, 12:04, 2003 +1 Re: Freedom - TLC Apr 23, 13:49, 2003 +2 Re: Freedom - nofaith Apr 24, 02:44, 2003 +1 Re: Freedom also means responsibility - TLC Apr 24, 13:18, 2003 +2 Re: Freedom also means responsibility - nofaith Apr 24, 14:15, 2003 +1 Re: Freedom also means responsibility - Fer-de-lance Apr 24, 18:29, 2003 +1 Re: Freedom also means responsibility - Cal Apr 25, 22:29, 2003 +2 Is this what Fer means? - Victoria! Apr 25, 22:38, 2003 Re: Freedom also means responsibility - Fer-de-lance Apr 26, 01:39, 2003 +1 Redistribution and Dreams - TLC Apr 26, 13:57, 2003 Personal responsibility? get ethical! (and real) - james Apr 27, 18:50, 2003 +1 Egyptology? - TLC Apr 28, 07:48, 2003 Re: Freedom - Phoebus Apr 24, 05:42, 2003 May I jump in?! - Bahman Apr 23, 12:09, 2003 +1 Re: May I jump in?! - TLC Apr 23, 14:15, 2003 +1 Well said, and . . . - Bahman Apr 23, 14:26, 2003 Maybe it never existed! - james Apr 27, 18:48, 2003 Re: To both Another Bob and Phoebus - Another Bob Apr 23, 03:43, 2003 +1 Re: To both Another Bob and Phoebus - TLC Apr 23, 10:01, 2003 +1 It depends how you define the terms, TLC - nofaith Apr 24, 01:26, 2003 +2 Atrocity. - Another Bob Apr 24, 11:13, 2003 +1 Election 2004 - JAK Apr 24, 23:17, 2003 Re: It depends how you define the terms, TLC - TLC Apr 24, 11:45, 2003 +1 Re: It depends how you define the terms, TLC - nofaith Apr 24, 15:06, 2003 +1 Re: It depends how you define the terms, TLC - TLC Apr 26, 14:58, 2003 +2 Re: It depends how you define the terms, TLC - another bob Apr 26, 18:26, 2003 +1 Re: It depends how you define the terms, TLC - TLC Apr 28, 08:00, 2003 +1 Re: It depends how you define the terms, TLC - Another Bob Apr 29, 19:34, 2003 Argh - nofaith Apr 30, 01:08, 2003 +1 Perspective - TLC Apr 30, 08:21, 2003 +1 Re: Perspective - nofaith Apr 30, 14:39, 2003 Prank Call - Victoria! Apr 22, 00:55, 2003 +1 Re: Prank Call - Another Bob Apr 22, 14:07, 2003

The Purpose of Life? - Bahman Apr 20, 19:06, 2003 +60 Re: The Purpose of Life? - TLC Apr 20, 19:59, 2003 +1 Golden Rule is good - Bahman Apr 20, 23:42, 2003 +2 Re: Golden Rule is good - Craig C. Apr 21, 00:10, 2003 +2 A bit of science! - Bahman Apr 21, 14:07, 2003 +2 Re: A bit of science! - JAK Apr 21, 18:53, 2003 +2 Scarcity - james Apr 21, 20:31, 2003 +1 Re: Scarcity - JAK Apr 21, 21:24, 2003 +1 Needs - james Apr 27, 18:36, 2003 +1 <