What is "Christian" anyway? - Waspinatrix Jan 16, 04:21, 2002 +40 Re: What is "Christian" anyway? - JAK Jan 16, 16:10, 2002 +1 Re: 10 different answers - Zoe Jan 16, 21:20, 2002 +1 Re: 100's of different answers - JAK Jan 16, 22:29, 2002 +1 Re: 100's of different questions - Zoe Jan 16, 23:40, 2002 +2 Part I - JAK Jan 17, 21:52, 2002 +2 Re: Part I - Waspinatrix Jan 18, 05:35, 2002 Sorry I didn't get a chance to respond yesterday, - Zoe Jan 19, 13:10, 2002 +1 I appreciate time factors, Zoe - JAK Jan 23, 13:21, 2002 Part II - JAK Jan 17, 22:43, 2002 +3 Re: Part II - Waspinatrix Jan 18, 07:08, 2002 +1 Excellent contributions Waspinatrix! - Zoe Jan 19, 13:49, 2002 Noticible typos - Waspinatrix Jan 18, 07:15, 2002 Once again, I think Waspinatrix has done - Zoe Jan 19, 13:22, 2002 +1 The Inconsistency - JAK Jan 20, 14:53, 2002 +1 Re: The Inconsistency - Zoe Jan 21, 00:20, 2002 +1 Re: Part I of 2 - JAK Jan 21, 22:22, 2002 +2 Re: Part II of 2 (picks up) - JAK Jan 21, 22:34, 2002 +1 Re: Part II of 2 (picks up) - Zoe Jan 22, 12:29, 2002 +2 Re: I will respond... - JAK Jan 22, 22:32, 2002 Response to Part II of 2 - JAK Jan 23, 12:45, 2002 Re: Part I of 2 - Zoe Jan 22, 02:03, 2002 +1 Re: Part I of 2 - JAK Jan 22, 19:50, 2002 +1 Re: Part I of 2 - Zoe Jan 24, 02:08, 2002 +1 R to R 1 - JAK Jan 24, 16:09, 2002 +2 Re: R to R 2 - JAK Jan 24, 16:14, 2002 +1 Thanks for the good discussion JAK; - Zoe Jan 25, 19:28, 2002 +2 Re: Ditto, Zoe - JAK Jan 25, 21:17, 2002 Unsolicited dictionary advice - Alf Omega Jan 25, 23:29, 2002 +1 Re: Unsolicited dictionary advice - JAK Jan 28, 22:10, 2002 Right in the teeth - Waspinatrix Jan 25, 16:04, 2002 +1 Thnks for the help Waspinatrix., and very good - Zoe Jan 25, 19:17, 2002 +2 Re: Thnks for the help Waspinatrix., and very good - JAK Jan 28, 22:19, 2002 You are out of more than energy, Zoe - JAK Jan 28, 22:20, 2002 +1 Not only spiteful, but you can't even - Zoe Jan 29, 19:24, 2002 +1 Continued non-response... - JAK Jan 29, 19:34, 2002 +1 We addressed all of the issues repeatedly, - Zoe Jan 29, 20:12, 2002 Re: What is "Christian" anyway? - Douglas A... Jan 17, 10:26, 2002 +1 Mindless - JAK Jan 20, 15:05, 2002 +2 Re: Mindless - Waspinatrix Jan 21, 06:43, 2002 Re: Mindful - Douglas A... Jan 22, 09:46, 2002

Mizpah - Vicki Jan 16, 01:25, 2002 +2 And another - Aaron V. Jan 16, 01:32, 2002 +1 Re: And another - Snowy Shaw Jan 16, 03:55, 2002

A Christian Heaven??? - shooter Jan 15, 18:55, 2002 +69 That is not my idea - Vicki Jan 15, 19:57, 2002 +1 Re: That is not my idea - JAK Jan 15, 20:03, 2002 +1 Well JAK, - Vicki Jan 15, 20:08, 2002 +1 Re: Vicki has described "heaven," sho... - JAK Jan 15, 20:21, 2002 +1 JAK, Try - Vicki Jan 15, 23:09, 2002 +1 Understanding Vicki's H.. - JAK Jan 16, 15:12, 2002 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - JAK Jan 15, 20:08, 2002 +1 It would appear that the basis lies in - Vicki Jan 15, 20:12, 2002 +1 Re: 10 for 10 - JAK Jan 15, 20:30, 2002 +1 LOL JAK! - Vicki Jan 16, 00:22, 2002 +1 Re: In reference -- - JAK Jan 16, 15:05, 2002 My early view of Heaven - Aaron V. Jan 15, 21:08, 2002 +1 And your view now?? (no text) - JAK Jan 15, 21:17, 2002 +1 Heaven as a myth... - Aaron V. Jan 15, 21:22, 2002 +1 Re: Heaven as a myth... - JAK Jan 16, 15:17, 2002 +1 What exactly do you find "interesting"... - Zoe Jan 16, 20:14, 2002 +2 The Mormon exception - Alf Omega Jan 16, 20:36, 2002 +2 Well, thank you for your faith in my honesty, ... - Zoe Jan 16, 21:53, 2002 Re: The Mormon exception - Douglas A... Jan 17, 13:28, 2002 Myth & Interesting - JAK Jan 16, 21:45, 2002 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - sojourner Jan 15, 22:42, 2002 +1 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - Douglas A... Jan 17, 13:36, 2002 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - Arne Bohlen Jan 16, 02:18, 2002 +1 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - JAK Jan 16, 15:22, 2002 +1 Very true (no text) - Aaron V. Jan 16, 22:53, 2002 heaven will be hell. - someone Jan 16, 11:33, 2002 +1 Re: heaven will be hell. - JAK Jan 16, 14:52, 2002 +2 Re: heaven will be hell. - Maude Jan 16, 16:03, 2002 +1 Re: heaven will be hell. - JAK Jan 16, 16:07, 2002 What is your background JAK, because... - Zoe Jan 16, 19:56, 2002 +1 Contrasts - JAK Jan 16, 21:15, 2002 +1 You make some good points, but ... - Zoe Jan 16, 22:30, 2002 +1 Some problems - JAK Jan 16, 22:51, 2002 +1 Well, maybe you can explain it to me... - Zoe Jan 16, 23:50, 2002 +2 Comparision & Contrast - JAK Jan 17, 14:52, 2002 +2 Re: Comparision & Contrast - someone Jan 17, 16:28, 2002 JAK, are you trying to wear me out? - Zoe Jan 19, 13:30, 2002 +1 Of course not. - JAK Jan 20, 19:22, 2002 Comparison & Contrast II - JAK Jan 17, 15:18, 2002 +1 Again JAK, I have to ask - Zoe Jan 19, 13:39, 2002 +1 In response to your inquiry - JAK Jan 20, 20:19, 2002 +1 I can't agree that ... - Zoe Jan 21, 13:31, 2002 +1 A review... - JAK Jan 21, 23:19, 2002 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - T-Bone Jan 16, 16:19, 2002 +3 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - mikwut Jan 16, 16:24, 2002 +2 And YOUR view?? - JAK Jan 16, 17:26, 2002 +1 My view - T-Bone Jan 17, 09:39, 2002 +1 Re: My view - JAK Jan 20, 20:46, 2002 viewing the damned - someone Jan 16, 18:40, 2002 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - JAK Jan 16, 17:23, 2002 +1 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - mikwut Jan 16, 19:04, 2002 +3 Begging the question - Alf Omega Jan 16, 20:07, 2002 +1 Thank you Alf! - Zoe Jan 16, 20:24, 2002 No description - JAK Jan 16, 20:24, 2002 +1 Re: No description - mikwut Jan 17, 11:41, 2002 +1 Re: No description - JAK Jan 17, 15:59, 2002 +1 Re: No description - mikwut Jan 17, 17:36, 2002 +2 Consider your world view - JAK Jan 17, 20:26, 2002 Burden of Proof - JAK Jan 17, 20:55, 2002 +1 Re: Burden of Proof - mikwut Jan 18, 13:28, 2002 +1 Re: Burden of Proof - JAK Jan 25, 15:08, 2002 +1 Re: Burden of Proof - Ramona Jan 25, 17:20, 2002 Fundamentalism in mikwut’s behalf - JAK Jan 17, 18:59, 2002 +1 Re: Fundamentalism in mikwut’s behalf - mikwut Jan 17, 19:10, 2002 +1 mikwut's behalf - JAK Jan 17, 21:03, 2002 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - Douglas A... Jan 17, 13:17, 2002 The definition of Heaven and Hell - Mensch Jan 16, 21:28, 2002 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - Douglas A... Jan 17, 13:01, 2002 Re: A Christian Heaven??? - Vince Jan 20, 23:29, 2002

"The Future of Life" - horace Jan 15, 18:42, 2002 +2 Re: "The Future of Life" - Aaron V. Jan 15, 21:12, 2002 Re: "The Future of Life" - shooter Jan 24, 10:28, 2002

Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Logan Jan 15, 03:51, 2002 +30 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Sarah Jan 15, 09:45, 2002 +2 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - RobRoy Jan 15, 10:46, 2002 +2 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Sarah Jan 15, 12:02, 2002 +1 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - RobRoy Jan 15, 12:35, 2002 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - T-Bone Jan 15, 13:07, 2002 +1 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Randy Jan 15, 13:23, 2002 +1 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Sarah Jan 15, 18:53, 2002 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Logan Jan 15, 18:13, 2002 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - shooter Jan 15, 10:33, 2002 I was taught this - SciGirl Jan 15, 11:48, 2002 +1 The Baptism Of The Earth - Logan Jan 15, 18:20, 2002 +1 Belief: an interesting question! - SciGirl Jan 15, 18:37, 2002 +2 Wow! Deep Doctrine! - Logan Jan 15, 19:18, 2002 +1 which begs the question... - rdl Jan 16, 08:28, 2002 What on Earth/ - Chi Jan 17, 04:37, 2002 +1 Ouch! - SciGirl Jan 17, 11:58, 2002 +2 Re: Ouch! - someone Jan 17, 12:04, 2002 +1 I'll bite! - SciGirl Jan 17, 12:09, 2002 +2 Re: I'll bite! - someone Jan 17, 12:54, 2002 Re: I'll bite! - someone Jan 17, 15:42, 2002 +3 saturn link - someone Jan 17, 15:46, 2002 Cool! - SciGirl Jan 17, 15:58, 2002 +1 Re: Cool! - someone Jan 17, 21:34, 2002 Planet Sex - Logan Jan 17, 17:11, 2002 Down to Earth? - Chi Jan 18, 04:27, 2002 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - someone Jan 15, 12:00, 2002 +1 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Logan Jan 15, 18:23, 2002 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Mat Jan 15, 20:16, 2002 +1 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Logan Jan 16, 00:45, 2002 Re: Now Onto Matters Of Substance - Waspinatrix Jan 18, 08:47, 2002

Darling Martin! - Logan Jan 15, 03:41, 2002 +3 Re: Darling Martin! - Ramona Jan 16, 11:19, 2002 Thanks, pal! - Martin Jan 17, 01:47, 2002 +1 Re: Thanks, pal! - Logan Jan 17, 03:19, 2002

God's Hand In Things - Logan Jan 14, 18:17, 2002 +21 Absolutely, Logan - Eric Jan 14, 18:33, 2002 Re: God's Hand In Things - mikwut Jan 14, 19:08, 2002 +2 Huh? - Eric Jan 14, 20:13, 2002 +2 Re: Huh? - RobRoy Jan 15, 10:54, 2002 +2 Re: Huh? - mikwut Jan 15, 11:38, 2002 Interesting logic - Eric Jan 15, 19:57, 2002 +1 Re: Interesting logic - RobRoy Jan 16, 11:08, 2002 Re: Huh? - mikwut Jan 15, 11:52, 2002 Re: God's Hand In Things - Logan Jan 15, 18:52, 2002 +1 Re: God's Hand In Things - mikwut Jan 15, 19:02, 2002 Two lives - zip Jan 15, 08:24, 2002 +1 Re: Two lives - RobRoy Jan 15, 10:59, 2002 +1 Re: Two lives - Sarah Jan 15, 12:12, 2002 +1 Re: Two lives - RobRoy Jan 15, 13:04, 2002 Re: God's Hand In Things - T-Bone Jan 15, 09:58, 2002 Re: God's Hand In Things - Sarah Jan 15, 10:11, 2002 Re: God's Hand In Things - shooter Jan 15, 10:39, 2002 +1 Re: God's Hand In Things - Sarah Jan 15, 12:04, 2002 quick question - grendel Jan 15, 13:08, 2002 +2 Belief In An All-Pervasive God - Logan Jan 15, 18:34, 2002 Re: quick question - Christopher Jan 22, 21:36, 2002

The Book of Mormon - RobRoy Jan 14, 16:09, 2002 +4 Re: The Book of Mormon - rpcman Jan 14, 16:34, 2002 +1 Re: The Book of Mormon - RobRoy Jan 15, 10:45, 2002 Re: The Book of Mormon - William Jan 17, 15:05, 2002 +1 Aside to William: Extremely Small World - Briandc Jan 18, 15:44, 2002

Heavenly Mother in Scripture, or not?!? - Waspinatrix Jan 14, 04:34, 2002 +5 Re: Heavenly Mother in Scripture, or not?!? - someone Jan 14, 12:26, 2002 Re: Heavenly Mother in Scripture, or not?!? - Phillllip Jan 14, 23:24, 2002 Re: Heavenly Mother in Scripture, or not?!? - Douglas... Jan 15, 10:32, 2002 Re: Heavenly Mother in Scripture, or not?!? - shooter Jan 15, 10:42, 2002 PB's, etc. - T-Bone Jan 15, 13:14, 2002

Martin is a misogynist,. - Zoe Jan 14, 03:33, 2002 +32 But precious! I love you! - Martin Jan 14, 03:48, 2002 Tee hee - Aaron V. Jan 14, 10:48, 2002 +1 I find it a bit distressing - Briandc Jan 14, 12:01, 2002 +2 Re: I find it a bit distressing - Aaron V. Jan 14, 13:40, 2002 +1 Ok, so maybe I overreacted a bit - Briandc Jan 14, 14:29, 2002 +1 There was a purpose to my original post - Aaron V. Jan 14, 15:30, 2002 +1 Fair enough, I obviously misunderstood your intent - Briandc Jan 14, 16:43, 2002 +1 No problem at all - Aaron V. Jan 14, 19:49, 2002 +1 I can understand your not wanting to - Zoe Jan 14, 20:32, 2002 +2 Re: I can understand your not wanting to - Aaron V. Jan 14, 22:06, 2002 In addition - Aaron V. Jan 14, 22:13, 2002 +1 Actually, I wouldn't count it as a sexist remark; - Zoe Jan 14, 23:48, 2002 +1 Re: Actually, I wouldn't count it as... - Aaron V. Jan 15, 00:26, 2002 +1 Fair enough Aaron (I'd forgotten about that, and - Zoe Jan 15, 01:49, 2002 Question, BrianDC - Martin Jan 17, 01:44, 2002 +1 Martin - Briandc Jan 18, 14:37, 2002 I think rpcman has made... - Briandc Jan 14, 11:50, 2002 +1 Thank you for the reminder, and please don't blame - Zoe Jan 14, 18:59, 2002 +1 Wait a second... - Ollie Jan 14, 19:51, 2002 +1 Glad you feel that way Ollie; - Zoe Jan 14, 20:28, 2002 +2 On Sexist Remarks! - Vicki Jan 14, 20:42, 2002 +1 I'm sorry if you thought my remarks were - Zoe Jan 14, 21:52, 2002 +1 Here's exactly what's wrong with me Zoe - Vicki Jan 15, 15:59, 2002 +1 I'll indulge in one reply Vicki, but - Zoe Jan 15, 20:44, 2002 +1 Hereafter Zoe, - Vicki Jan 16, 00:06, 2002 Re: Glad you feel that way Ollie; - Ollie Jan 16, 10:35, 2002 +2 It was Dilber aka David - Briandc Jan 16, 11:50, 2002 +1 Re: It was Dilbert aka David - Ollie Jan 16, 12:47, 2002 +1 Actually Ollie,... - Zoe Jan 16, 19:12, 2002 MY MOST PROFOUND APOLOGIES OLLIE! - Zoe Jan 16, 18:44, 2002 +1 Re: MY MOST PROFOUND APOLOGIES OLLIE! - Ollie Jan 19, 17:54, 2002 Let's use a bit of perspective, shall we? - Martin Jan 16, 22:29, 2002

chatting in the chat room - violet Jan 14, 00:25, 2002 +4 Re: chatting in the chat room - Sarah Jan 14, 09:17, 2002 +1 not good! - violet Jan 14, 10:08, 2002 +2 Hi Violet! - Aaron V. Jan 14, 10:34, 2002 I agree violet! - Vicki Jan 15, 01:00, 2002

Book of Abraham - Tarnhelm Jan 13, 21:47, 2002 +54 Re: Book of Abraham - violet Jan 14, 00:21, 2002 +1 Number of posts per page - rpcman Jan 14, 12:47, 2002 Re: Book of Abraham - Martin Jan 14, 01:32, 2002 +3 Re: Book of Abraham - violet Jan 14, 02:03, 2002 +4 Re: Book of Abraham - Martin Jan 14, 02:38, 2002 +1 Don't be fooled violet. - Zoe Jan 14, 02:46, 2002 +1 Yes, Don't be fooled violet! - Martin Jan 14, 03:51, 2002 Astronomy and Astrology were - Zoe Jan 14, 02:39, 2002 +2 Re: Astronomy and Astrology were - Martin Jan 14, 02:43, 2002 +1 Didn't you just admit to a lack of - Zoe Jan 14, 02:53, 2002 +1 Oh, Golly! - Martin Jan 14, 03:28, 2002 +1 Yes, I am better than that. - Zoe Jan 14, 03:39, 2002 +1 What??? - Martin Jan 14, 03:44, 2002 +1 In that case, leave, and don't come back. n/t - Zoe Jan 14, 04:06, 2002 +1 But that would deny my love and devotion! - Martin Jan 14, 04:39, 2002 +1 Re: But that would deny my love and devotion! - violet Jan 14, 10:16, 2002 By whom? - Tyler Jan 14, 02:47, 2002 +1 By everyone. - Zoe Jan 14, 02:59, 2002 +1 Re: By everyone. - Tyler Jan 14, 12:48, 2002 +1 I think you've missed my point here Tyler. - Zoe Jan 15, 00:11, 2002 Astrology and Astronomy - Gunnar Jan 14, 03:24, 2002 +1 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Martin Jan 14, 03:41, 2002 +2 Gunnar and I are in complete agreement. n/t - Zoe Jan 14, 04:04, 2002 +2 And now you are a mind reader? - Martin Jan 14, 04:42, 2002 +1 Re: And now you are a mind reader? - Gunnar Jan 14, 05:05, 2002 Some facts, your grace - Martin Jan 14, 05:45, 2002 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Gunnar Jan 14, 04:52, 2002 +3 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Martin Jan 14, 05:16, 2002 +1 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Gunnar Jan 14, 06:25, 2002 +2 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Martin Jan 14, 06:47, 2002 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Martin Jan 14, 06:49, 2002 +2 Martin, since you clearly love me so much, - Zoe Jan 14, 09:17, 2002 +1 Re: Martin, since you clearly love me so much, - violet Jan 14, 09:55, 2002 +1 Martin did a cursory search online, that - Zoe Jan 14, 11:59, 2002 +1 SO? and your point is? - violet Jan 14, 12:29, 2002 +1 I think my point is obvious. What's yours? - Zoe Jan 14, 18:50, 2002 +1 sorry - violet Jan 14, 21:11, 2002 +1 I'm not lying, and I resent the accusation. Why - Zoe Jan 15, 00:15, 2002 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Gunnar Jan 15, 03:57, 2002 +1 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Martin Jan 17, 03:21, 2002 +2 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Gunnar Jan 21, 07:41, 2002 Astrology and Astronomy - Waspinatrix Jan 21, 17:19, 2002 +2 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Gunnar Jan 23, 03:34, 2002 +1 Re: Astrology and Astronomy - Waspinatrix Jan 23, 12:10, 2002 Errata - Waspinatrix Jan 23, 11:59, 2002 Astrology was not Astronomy: some references - Martin Jan 14, 05:34, 2002 You might also want to see... - Martin Jan 14, 06:05, 2002 +1 Thank you Martin! - Gunnar Jan 15, 04:18, 2002 Hi Violet! A side note on LDS Astrology - Kevin Jan 15, 23:59, 2002 +1 Re: Hi Violet! A side note on LDS Astrology - violet Jan 16, 00:41, 2002 Re: Book of Abraham - Tarnhelm Jan 14, 07:21, 2002 Re: Book of Abraham - Waspinatrix Jan 16, 05:30, 2002 +1 Re: Book of Abraham - Martin Jan 17, 03:58, 2002 +1 Re: Copernicus (sp?) - Waspinatrix Jan 17, 06:16, 2002

Religious Tolerance - JAK Jan 13, 18:51, 2002 +12 The irony of W preaching religious tolerance. - Tyler Jan 13, 18:59, 2002 +2 Re: Thank you, Tyler - JAK Jan 13, 19:06, 2002 Re: The irony of W preaching religious tolerance. - Gunnar Jan 16, 06:24, 2002 +2 Re: The irony of W preaching religious tolerance. - Maude Jan 16, 14:01, 2002 Re: The irony of W preaching religious tolerance. - Bahman Jan 16, 17:42, 2002 Re: Religious Tolerance - Maude Jan 13, 22:59, 2002 +1 Re: Religious Tolerance - JAK Jan 15, 21:14, 2002 +1 Re: Religious Tolerance - Maude Jan 15, 23:25, 2002 +1 Re: Religious Tolerance - JAK Jan 16, 14:41, 2002 Re: Religious Tolerance - mikwut Jan 14, 07:56, 2002 +1 Re: Religious Tolerance - rdl Jan 14, 21:47, 2002 Re: Religious Tolerance - shooter Jan 24, 10:31, 2002

Egyptian - New World traders - rpcman Jan 13, 10:48, 2002 +1 Re: Egyptian - New World traders - Gunnar Jan 14, 02:59, 2002

chat room?? - linuxgrl Jan 13, 03:43, 2002 +5 Re: chat room?? - Ramona Jan 13, 15:29, 2002 +1 Re: chat room?? - JAK Jan 13, 16:16, 2002 +1 LOL - Ramona Jan 13, 16:39, 2002 +1 Re: LOL - JAK Jan 13, 18:53, 2002 +1 Re: LOL - Vicki Jan 13, 19:20, 2002

"Melaleuca Inc." mormon or not? - linuxgrl Jan 13, 03:00, 2002 +3 Re: "Melaleuca Inc." mormon or not? - Briandc Jan 14, 15:21, 2002 +1 Re: "Melaleuca Inc." mormon or not? - rpcman Jan 15, 13:51, 2002 Re: "Melaleuca Inc." mormon or not? - shooter Jan 15, 10:44, 2002

Can I get a believers Roll Call? - Vicki Jan 13, 00:50, 2002 +21 Well, the board's gotten lonely lately - Cal Jan 13, 01:02, 2002 +1 Well Cal, - Vicki Jan 13, 01:23, 2002 +1 Re: Well Cal, - Cal Jan 13, 01:36, 2002 +1 Thanks Cal, - Vicki Jan 13, 01:42, 2002 +1 Hiya, Vickie! - Deb Jan 13, 03:28, 2002 +1 Re: Hiya, Vickie! - violet Jan 13, 16:33, 2002 Re: Can I get a believers Roll Call? - Ramona Jan 13, 13:39, 2002 Still browsing occasionally... - Zoe Jan 13, 14:58, 2002 Re: Can I get a believers Roll Call? - T-Bone Jan 13, 15:48, 2002 +3 Hi Guys! - Vicki Jan 13, 19:25, 2002 I'm so screwed up! - Vicki Jan 13, 19:29, 2002 Why aren't my posts showing up on this thread? - Vicki Jan 13, 19:38, 2002 +1 Re: Posting Problems - JAK Jan 13, 20:17, 2002 +1 Sir JAK! - Vicki Jan 14, 01:24, 2002 Re: Can I get a believers Roll Call? - Ray gardner Jan 14, 12:10, 2002 Re: Can I get a believers Roll Call? - sojourner Jan 14, 17:06, 2002 +1 sojourner! - Vicki Jan 15, 00:06, 2002 +1 Re: sojourner! - sojourner Jan 15, 10:43, 2002 +1 Re: sojourner! - Vicki Jan 15, 20:02, 2002 Re: Can I get a believers Roll Call? - Mat Jan 15, 20:20, 2002 +1 Re: Can I get a believers Roll Call? - Vicki Jan 16, 00:13, 2002

God's Memory & The REAL Ten Commandments - Martin Jan 12, 20:02, 2002 +89 Know the commandments! And do better . . . - Cal Jan 13, 00:04, 2002 Alright you got me! - Vicki Jan 13, 00:40, 2002 +1 Kids in their mothers' milk - Alf Omega Jan 13, 17:00, 2002 +1 There's nothing especially peculiar about... - Zoe Jan 13, 20:52, 2002 +2 Re: There's nothing especially peculiar about... - Aaron V. Jan 14, 00:26, 2002 +2 The point, dear Aaron, is to ... - Zoe Jan 14, 01:36, 2002 +2 Isn't Zoe just so precious and loving, Aaron? - Martin Jan 14, 01:48, 2002 +2 Yes, definitely. (no text) - Aaron V. Jan 14, 02:19, 2002 ClickClickClick!!! - Waspinatrix Jan 20, 04:32, 2002 Question - Aaron V. Jan 14, 02:07, 2002 +1 Well, whatever works for you, Aaron. n/t - Zoe Jan 14, 02:10, 2002 +1 Re: Well, whatever works for you, Aaron. n/t - Aaron V. Jan 14, 02:16, 2002 +1 I didn bring the subject up. - Zoe Jan 14, 02:24, 2002 Re: There's nothing especially peculiar about... - Waspinatrix Jan 20, 04:14, 2002 Tell that to the Israelites - Alf Omega Jan 14, 11:30, 2002 God's Memory, REAL 10 Commandments. Way too easy - Ramona Jan 13, 15:18, 2002 +4 Re: God's Memory, REAL 10 - JAK Jan 13, 16:21, 2002 +2 Re: God's Memory, REAL 10 - Ramona Jan 13, 16:49, 2002 JAK, a question - Martin Jan 14, 00:31, 2002 Ramona Huh? - Vicki Jan 13, 19:17, 2002 +1 Re: Ramona Huh? - Ramona Jan 13, 20:42, 2002 +3 Re: Ramona Huh? - Martin Jan 13, 22:20, 2002 +1 Marty, HONEYBUNCH - Ramona Jan 14, 07:08, 2002 +1 Re: Marty, HONEYBUNCH - Martin Jan 19, 18:52, 2002 Re: Ramona Huh? - Vicki Jan 13, 22:58, 2002 +1 No vicki, they don't cntradict each other. - Zoe Jan 13, 23:34, 2002 +3 Another brilliant contribution! - Martin Jan 13, 23:56, 2002 Looks like they do to me! - Vicki Jan 14, 01:20, 2002 +1 I'm not your "sweetie" Vicki. And why... - Zoe Jan 14, 01:44, 2002 +2 Re: I'm not your "sweetie" Vicki. - Vicki Jan 14, 01:49, 2002 +1 The last verse of what Vicki?. - Zoe Jan 14, 02:07, 2002 +1 Here it is Zoe! - Vicki Jan 14, 20:47, 2002 So you now admit Ramona was wrong, sweetie? - Martin Jan 14, 01:54, 2002 +1 No, of course not. I clearly stated... - Zoe Jan 14, 02:18, 2002 +1 Re: No, of course not. I clearly stated... - Martin Jan 14, 02:54, 2002 +1 Your hypocrisy only becomes more - Zoe Jan 14, 03:05, 2002 +1 Nothing could be farther from the truth, sweetie! - Martin Jan 14, 03:18, 2002 Yes, Zoe, they do! - Martin Jan 14, 01:44, 2002 +2 Martin I'm thinking - Vicki Jan 14, 01:52, 2002 +2 (aside LOL!) - Vicki Jan 14, 01:57, 2002 +1 Re: (aside LOL!) - Martin Jan 14, 04:06, 2002 Re: Martin I'm thinking - Martin Jan 14, 02:08, 2002 +1 Still waiting on that list of Biblical scholars - Zoe Jan 14, 02:29, 2002 +1 But at weast you wuv us so vewy, vewy much! - Martin Jan 14, 02:57, 2002 +1 Yes, I am keeping you up past your bedtime, - Zoe Jan 14, 03:07, 2002 +1 Re: Yes, I