1398-1914/19897

Find Overview Previous

Newest Forum

Is Deuteronomy a forgery? - Kevin Jan 26, 22:10, 2002 +4

Re: Is Deuteronomy a forgery? - rpcman Jan 27, 10:36, 2002 +1
- Re: Is Deuteronomy a forgery? - Kevin Jan 27, 12:47, 2002 +1
  - A book on biblical authorship - Cal Jan 27, 13:12, 2002 +1
    - Re: A book on biblical authorship - Kevin Jan 27, 15:02, 2002

Fabricated Stereotypes about Christians, for Vicki - Bob Jack Jan 26, 21:18, 2002 +16

The Joys of Stereotyping... - Waspinatrix Jan 26, 23:02, 2002 +2
- (aside to Waspi) - Vicki Jan 27, 16:22, 2002
- You make my point for me...thanks - Bob Jack Jan 28, 16:11, 2002
Simple Bigotry Bob Jack! - Vicki Jan 27, 16:18, 2002 +1
- It becomes rather simple - Bob Jack Jan 27, 20:14, 2002 +2
  - Simple is best... - Waspinatrix Jan 27, 21:00, 2002 +1
    - Re: Simple is best... - Bob Jack Jan 28, 14:12, 2002
  - Re: It becomes rather simple - Vicki Jan 28, 00:25, 2002 +1
    - Then you are a hypocrite - Bob Jack Jan 28, 10:30, 2002 +1
      - Mindless "reasoning" - Vicki Jan 28, 14:03, 2002 +1
        
        Actually, what I said was exactly right. - Bob Jack Jan 28, 14:18, 2002 +1
        
        Hello BJ? - Vicki Jan 28, 22:21, 2002 +2
        
        Reasoning & conscience -- the problem - JAK Jan 28, 23:26, 2002
        Jumping In - Kevin Jan 29, 00:07, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Jumping In - JAK Jan 29, 00:29, 2002
        Jump Back - Vicki Jan 29, 18:58, 2002

Jesus and the Riddle of the DSS. - Bubbles Jan 26, 17:32, 2002 +5

Question #1 - Vicki Jan 26, 19:42, 2002 +2
- Question #2 - Vicki Jan 26, 20:52, 2002 +1
  - Re: Question #2 - Ramona Jan 27, 15:05, 2002
- Re: Question #1 - Mat Jan 26, 22:57, 2002 +1
  - Hey Mat!!! - Vicki Jan 27, 15:44, 2002

Jesus and the Riddle of the DSS. - Bubbles Jan 26, 17:32, 2002

The meaning of is? - Galatians Jan 26, 14:19, 2002 +1

Re: The meaning of is? - Kevin Jan 26, 22:28, 2002

Cal, The Source Speaks! - Vicki Jan 26, 12:34, 2002 +6

Just 2 more cents... - Waspinatrix Jan 26, 13:16, 2002 +1
- 2 Cents Worth Much! - Vicki Jan 26, 14:43, 2002
Quick response for now - Cal Jan 26, 20:08, 2002 +1
- Re: Quick response for now - Vicki Jan 26, 20:55, 2002
Back at The Source - Cal Jan 28, 00:09, 2002
Vicki - Cal Jan 30, 00:51, 2002

Hypocracy of Religion.... - Waspinatrix Jan 26, 09:48, 2002 +77

What the...I think your going deep? - Vince Jan 26, 14:07, 2002 +1
- Left field - Dig there!!! - Waspinatrix Jan 26, 20:31, 2002 +1
  - more anti-science rhetoric - Craig C. Jan 27, 13:15, 2002 +2
    - Science - BadBadBad! - Waspinatrix Jan 27, 20:38, 2002 +1
      - the self-correcting nature of science - Craig C. Jan 27, 22:06, 2002 +1
        
        Re: the self-correcting nature of science - Waspinatrix Jan 28, 01:46, 2002 +1
        
        Re: the self-correcting nature of science - Craig C. Jan 30, 00:02, 2002 +1
        
        Very fine, Craig - JAK Jan 31, 21:34, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Very fine, Craig - Craig C. Jan 31, 21:46, 2002
    - Re: more anti-science rhetoric - sojourner Jan 28, 23:08, 2002 +1
      - Re: more anti-science rhetoric - Craig C. Jan 30, 00:37, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Evolutionary theory - sojourner Jan 30, 11:19, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Evolutionary theory - Craig C. Jan 31, 09:52, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Evolutionary theory - mikwut Jan 31, 13:22, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Evolutionary theory - Briandc Jan 31, 13:51, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Evolutionary theory - mikwut Jan 31, 14:16, 2002
        
        Irreducible complexity and design - Craig C. Jan 31, 22:32, 2002 +3
        
        Re: Irreducible complexity and design - mikwut Feb 01, 11:42, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Irreducible complexity and design - Craig C. Feb 02, 01:27, 2002
        
        Re: Irreducible complexity and design - sojourner Feb 01, 21:00, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Irreducible complexity and design - Craig C. Feb 02, 00:22, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Irreducible complexity and design - sojourner Feb 04, 13:27, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Irreducible complexity and design - Craig C. Feb 05, 01:25, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Irreducible complexity and design - sojourner Feb 05, 10:48, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Irreducible complexity and design - Craig C. Feb 05, 14:49, 2002 +2
        
        Natural bridge? - Bahman Feb 05, 18:50, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Natural bridge? - Craig C. Feb 05, 21:00, 2002 +1
        
        Eyes, again! - Bahman Feb 06, 00:16, 2002
        
        Cell formation - sojourner Feb 06, 12:18, 2002 +1
        
        Cell formation speculation - Craig C. Feb 06, 23:49, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Cell formation speculation - sojourner Feb 07, 13:11, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Cell formation speculation - Bahman Feb 07, 13:35, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Cell formation speculation - sojourner Feb 07, 16:35, 2002
        
        Re: Cell formation speculation - Craig C. Feb 07, 23:41, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Cell formation speculation - sojourner Feb 08, 10:17, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Cell formation speculation - Craig C. Feb 11, 22:32, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Nature's capability - sojourner Feb 12, 12:13, 2002 +1
        
        To sojourner, again! - Bahman Feb 12, 12:32, 2002 +1
        
        Re: To sojourner, again! - sojourner Feb 12, 14:18, 2002 +1
        
        Problem & Solution - Bahman Feb 12, 15:07, 2002
        
        Re: Cell formation speculation - JAK Feb 09, 22:22, 2002
        
        An observation about "irreducible complexi... - Alf Omega Feb 02, 17:01, 2002 +1
        
        Re: An observation about "irreducible comp... - Craig C. Feb 03, 01:16, 2002 +1
        
        Why Craig doesn't really mean "irreducible... - Alf Omega Feb 04, 13:53, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Why Craig doesn't really mean "irreduc... - Paul King Feb 04, 17:05, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Indirect evolution - sojourner Feb 05, 00:00, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Indirect evolution - Paul King Feb 05, 02:26, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Indirect evolution - sojourner Feb 05, 11:01, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Indirect evolution - Paul King Feb 05, 13:37, 2002
        
        Re: Why Craig doesn't really mean "irreduc... - Craig C. Feb 05, 01:33, 2002
        
        Re: Evolutionary theory - sojourner Feb 01, 20:02, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Evolutionary theory - Craig C. Feb 02, 12:17, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Evolutionary theory - sojourner Feb 04, 23:37, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Evolutionary theory - Craig C. Feb 05, 01:16, 2002 +2
        
        Eternal designer - Gunnar Feb 05, 04:08, 2002
        Re: Evolutionary theory - sojourner Feb 05, 11:33, 2002 +1
        
        Evidence of Evolutionary theory - Craig C. Feb 06, 00:14, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Evidence of Evolutionary theory - sojourner Feb 06, 14:53, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Evidence of Evolutionary theory - Craig C. Feb 06, 22:18, 2002
        Micro-evolution vs macro-evolution. - Gunnar Feb 09, 09:17, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Micro-evolution vs macro-evolution. - JAK Feb 09, 22:12, 2002
        Re: Micro-evolution vs macro-evolution. - sojourner Feb 10, 01:23, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Micro-evolution vs macro-evolution. - Craig C. Feb 10, 23:34, 2002 +2
        
        To sojourner - Bahman Feb 11, 01:17, 2002 +1
        
        Re: To sojourner - sojourner Feb 12, 11:28, 2002 +1
        
        To others! - Bahman Feb 12, 12:17, 2002 +1
        
        Catalina Island! - Bahman Feb 12, 19:47, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Catalina Island! - sojourner Feb 12, 20:22, 2002
        
        Re: Micro-evolution vs macro-evolution. - sojourner Feb 12, 13:51, 2002 +2
        
        Micro, Macro and Robot Cars - Briandc Feb 12, 14:42, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Micro, Macro and Robot Cars - sojourner Feb 12, 18:45, 2002
        
        Re: Micro-evolution vs macro-evolution. - Craig C. Feb 12, 23:45, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Micro-evolution vs macro-evolution. - sojourner Feb 13, 11:58, 2002
        Re: Micro-evolution vs macro-evolution. - JAK Feb 13, 21:52, 2002
Conspiracy allegations against science - Craig C. Jan 26, 15:21, 2002 +1
- Go dig in Left field... - Waspinatrix Jan 26, 20:33, 2002 +1
  - Weak evasion tactic: left field is empty (n/t) - Craig C. Jan 27, 12:19, 2002

Joseph Smith and his cracked theory - Waspinatrix Jan 25, 13:22, 2002 +5

Re: Joseph Smith and his cracked theory - sansfoy Jan 25, 16:37, 2002
J.S ....off this planet..more than Yoda - Yoda Jan 25, 21:48, 2002 +1
- Come back little Yoda! - Vicki Jan 26, 12:46, 2002
Re: Joseph Smith and his cracked theory - JCBROOKSBY Jan 27, 20:29, 2002
Ge-Zeus or Jesus - Douglas A... Jan 29, 12:36, 2002

just hi for now - phosphorus Jan 24, 14:33, 2002 +10

oh I think I found it... - phosphorus Jan 24, 14:56, 2002 +2
- Re: oh I think I found it... - Ramona Jan 24, 15:36, 2002 +1
  - Re: oh I think I found it... - phosphorus Jan 25, 11:16, 2002
- Re: oh I think I found it... - Sarah Jan 24, 20:35, 2002 +1
  - Re: oh I think I found it... - phosphorus Jan 25, 10:39, 2002 +1
    - Re: oh I think I found it... - Sarah Jan 25, 15:05, 2002
Lucifer, is that you? - Waspinatrix Jan 25, 08:34, 2002 +1
- Re: Lucifer, is that you? - phosphorus Jan 25, 11:04, 2002
Re: just hi for now - Bubbles Jan 27, 17:12, 2002 +1
- Re: just hi for now - someone Jan 28, 16:28, 2002

Hitler the Christian - Ollie Jan 24, 10:13, 2002 +32

Re: Hitler the Christian - Tyler Jan 24, 14:29, 2002 +1
- Thanks for the link -- not convinced, but open - Ollie Jan 24, 14:42, 2002 +1
  - Hey Ollie - great post! - Zoe Jan 24, 16:54, 2002 +1
    - May we see Zoe's sources? - JAK Jan 24, 18:43, 2002 +1
      - Actually JAK, I've read the same book. Have you? - Zoe Jan 25, 19:06, 2002 +1
        
        May we see your sources? - JAK Jan 25, 21:45, 2002 +1
        
        And my question to you was whether you'd read the - Zoe Jan 25, 22:11, 2002 +1
        
        And YOUR sources, Zoe, are what? - JAK Jan 25, 22:41, 2002 +1
        
        Having taken a look a Tyler's and, apparently, - Zoe Jan 27, 14:07, 2002 +1
        
        Zoe's non-response to JAK's post. - JAK Jan 28, 22:05, 2002 +2
        
        Re: JAK's non-response to Zoe - sojourner Jan 29, 00:00, 2002 +1
        
        Re: JAK's analysis of Zoe's post - JAK Jan 29, 00:18, 2002 +1
        
        Re: JAK's lack of analysis of Zoe's post - sojourner Jan 29, 01:12, 2002 +1
        
        Excellent point regarding "line by line&qu... - Zoe Jan 29, 01:30, 2002
        
        I did what I agreed to do in my post preceding - Zoe Jan 29, 00:51, 2002 +1
        
        Hitler & Religion - JAK Jan 31, 10:57, 2002
Completely off the cuff here... - Alf Omega Jan 24, 18:00, 2002 +1
- Re: Completely off the cuff here... - zip Jan 25, 09:04, 2002 +2
  - Not so off the cuff - Sarah Jan 25, 09:46, 2002
  - The safety of small assertions - Alf Omega Jan 25, 11:25, 2002 +2
    - But back to the original point - Ollie Jan 25, 12:31, 2002 +1
      - No quarrels - Alf Omega Jan 25, 13:19, 2002
    - Re: The safety of small assertions - zip Jan 25, 13:49, 2002 +1
      - Talk about your unassailable assertions - Alf Omega Jan 25, 14:20, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Talk about your unassailable assertions - zip Jan 28, 13:16, 2002 +1
        
        Christian tradition - Alf Omega Jan 30, 22:13, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Christian tradition - zip Jan 31, 09:30, 2002
Re: Hitler the Christian - Briandc Jan 25, 17:18, 2002 +2
- Re: Hitler the Christian - Ollie Jan 26, 15:32, 2002
- A couple comments - Ollie Jan 26, 17:12, 2002 +1
  - Re: A couple comments - Briandc Jan 29, 12:44, 2002
Re: Hitler the Christian - shooter Jan 31, 11:10, 2002

Jumping to conclusions - Sarah Jan 24, 10:06, 2002 +16

Re: Jumping to conclusions - Ramona Jan 24, 12:11, 2002 +1
- Re: Jumping to conclusions - AHF Jan 24, 16:45, 2002 +1
  - Thank you - Ramona Jan 24, 16:53, 2002
The Conclusion of Jumping - Waspinatrix Jan 24, 12:39, 2002
Re: Jumping to conclusions - RobRoy Jan 24, 14:48, 2002
Re: Jumping to conclusions - AHF Jan 24, 16:49, 2002
"Probably not as active as you should be&q... - Alf Omega Jan 24, 17:32, 2002 +1
- And some of us always manage to be kind, like ALF - Ramona Jan 24, 17:37, 2002 +1
  - jumping to appreciation - Sarah Jan 24, 18:28, 2002
Dear Mom, - Vicki Jan 24, 18:19, 2002 +1
- Re: Dear Mom, - Sarah Jan 24, 18:38, 2002
Sarah - sansfoy Jan 25, 16:40, 2002
I just have a thought. - Bubbles Jan 27, 17:21, 2002 +1
- "follow EVERYTHING that the Bible tells yo... - Alf Omega Jan 27, 20:03, 2002 +1
  - That was way too easy, Alf - sansfoy Jan 28, 14:29, 2002 +1
    - Picking the low-hanging fruit - Alf Omega Jan 28, 14:56, 2002

AHF: Sunday TV - Alf Omega Jan 23, 10:32, 2002 +6

Re: AHF: Sunday TV - AHF Jan 23, 15:47, 2002 +1
- AHF and GBH - Alf Omega Jan 23, 15:57, 2002 +1
  - Re: AHF and GBH - AHF Jan 23, 19:49, 2002 +1
    - Where ARE my reading glasses? - Alf Omega Jan 23, 20:37, 2002
Re: AHF: Sunday TV - shooter Jan 24, 10:00, 2002
Found it! - Alf Omega Jan 25, 19:01, 2002

What's it to ya? - Vicki Jan 22, 23:47, 2002 +200

Re: What's it to ya? - Ollie Jan 23, 10:04, 2002 +1
- Re: What's it to ya? - Vicki Jan 23, 15:08, 2002 +3
  - Re: What's it to ya? - someone Jan 23, 16:08, 2002 +1
    - Nope someone! - Vicki Jan 23, 16:23, 2002 +1
      - Re: Nope someone! - someone Jan 23, 16:41, 2002 +1
        
        Consumer Rights!!!!! Truth in labelling!!! - Vicki Jan 23, 16:45, 2002 +2
        
        Nice Dodge Ford Owner! - Vicki Jan 23, 16:47, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Nice Dodge Ford Owner! - someone Jan 23, 16:57, 2002
        someone is correct, Vicki - JAK Jan 23, 21:18, 2002
        
        Re: Consumer Rights!!!!! Truth in labelling!!! - someone Jan 23, 16:50, 2002 +1
        
        Fine analysis... - JAK Jan 23, 21:28, 2002 +1
        
        Inaccurate Analysis on your part JAK! - Vicki Jan 25, 20:38, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Inaccurate Analysis on your part JAK! - sansfoy Jan 26, 07:05, 2002
  - Clearing the air a little - Ollie Jan 23, 17:36, 2002 +1
    - Re: Clearing the air a little - JAK Jan 23, 21:01, 2002 +1
      - Aw Shucks - Ollie Jan 23, 21:33, 2002
  - Vicki, "the strawman" - JAK Jan 23, 20:52, 2002 +1
    - Oh JAK! I get it! - Vicki Jan 24, 00:31, 2002
I have no problem - SciGirl Jan 23, 12:59, 2002 +3
- Re: I surrender - rdl Jan 23, 14:09, 2002 +1
  - You are very kind - SciGirl Jan 23, 14:30, 2002 +2
    - LOL n/t - rdl Jan 23, 14:38, 2002
    - Ditto to what rdl said. - Gunnar Feb 03, 08:49, 2002
- SciGirl Nails it! - Vicki Jan 23, 15:14, 2002 +2
  - Then what *is* the problem? - SciGirl Jan 23, 15:36, 2002 +1
    - Re: Then what *is* the problem? - Vicki Jan 23, 15:44, 2002 +1
      - Re: Then what *is* the problem? - JAK Jan 23, 21:55, 2002
  - A knock on the door... - JAK Jan 23, 21:50, 2002 +1
    - Why JAK? - Vicki Jan 24, 00:35, 2002 +1
      - Re: Why JAK? - Ramona Jan 24, 12:22, 2002
- Re: I have no problem - JAK Jan 23, 21:44, 2002
Re: What's it to ya? - Christopher Jan 23, 14:01, 2002 +1
- Re: What's it to ya? - Vicki Jan 23, 15:41, 2002 +1
  - Good for you - Christopher Jan 23, 16:51, 2002 +1
    - Hey Chris! - Vicki Jan 24, 00:27, 2002
Re: What's it to ya? - someone Jan 23, 14:20, 2002
Re: and here goes... - rdl Jan 23, 14:37, 2002 +2
- Booooring! - Vicki Jan 23, 15:20, 2002 +1
  - Re: well, no duh... - rdl Jan 23, 16:05, 2002 +1
    - No Luck Involved rdl! - Vicki Jan 24, 00:23, 2002
- Wonderful! - JAK Jan 23, 22:05, 2002 +2
  - Re: well gosh - rdl Jan 23, 22:19, 2002
  - Get Real JAK - Vicki Jan 24, 01:29, 2002
Human Experience is Universal, neh? - Waspinatrix Jan 23, 14:37, 2002 +1
- Waspi? - Vicki Jan 23, 15:46, 2002 +1
  - Re: Waspi? - Waspinatrix Jan 23, 21:04, 2002
Re: What's it to ya? - marg Jan 23, 14:59, 2002 +1
- Whoa that marg! - Vicki Jan 23, 16:16, 2002 +1
  - Re: Whoa that marg! - marg Jan 23, 18:03, 2002
Uhhh.... because it's evil? - Tyler Jan 23, 16:10, 2002 +2
- Bring it on Tyler! - Vicki Jan 23, 16:20, 2002
- Re: evil? - rdl Jan 23, 16:25, 2002 +2
  - A Sense of Belonging! - Vicki Jan 23, 16:28, 2002 +1
    - Re: A Sense of Belonging! - rdl Jan 23, 16:45, 2002
  - Re: evil? - Tyler Jan 23, 17:00, 2002 +1
    - Re: evil? - rdl Jan 23, 22:42, 2002
Re: What's it to ya? - Bob Jack Jan 23, 16:14, 2002 +6
- Stir THIS Bob Jack! - Vicki Jan 23, 16:42, 2002 +1
  - Re: Stir THIS Bob Jack! - Bob Jack Jan 24, 12:21, 2002 +1
    - Re: Stir THIS Bob Jack! - JAK Jan 24, 19:00, 2002
- Well done Bob! - Briandc Jan 23, 17:32, 2002
- A very fine statement Bob Jack (no text) - JAK Jan 23, 22:20, 2002 +1
  - The Atta Boy Club is Alive and Well! - Vicki Jan 24, 00:33, 2002
- Those Darn Crisitians! - Waspinatrix Jan 24, 07:00, 2002 +2
  - Re: Those Darn Crisitians! - Bob Jack Jan 24, 13:06, 2002 +1
    - Re: Those Darn Crisitians! - Waspinatrix Jan 24, 15:33, 2002 +1
      - Re: Those Darn Crisitians! - Bob Jack Jan 24, 17:30, 2002 +1
        
        Those darn Interpretations! - Waspinatrix Jan 24, 22:49, 2002
  - You talking about me Bob Jack? - Vicki Jan 25, 00:38, 2002 +1
    - He said, she said, I'm sorry... - Waspinatrix Jan 25, 12:50, 2002 +1
      - No Problem Waspi! - Vicki Jan 25, 19:20, 2002
- Does anyone else find this unbelievably humerous? - BaccaYarro Jan 24, 21:04, 2002 +2
  - Yes I do! - Vicki Jan 25, 00:28, 2002
  - Re: Humanism - sojourner Jan 25, 10:04, 2002 +1
    - The challenge has been accepted - Waspinatrix Jan 26, 21:50, 2002 +1
      - Not meant as a challenge. Simply interested. n/t (no text) - sojourner Jan 28, 13:57, 2002
- What's it to ya?...Everything! - Vince Jan 27, 10:52, 2002
Come on Vicki - Briandc Jan 23, 16:43, 2002 +4
- A few passages on preaching - Briandc Jan 23, 17:26, 2002 +4
  - As usual, I am in awe of you, sir. n/t - Tom Kraus Jan 23, 19:02, 2002 +1
    - In awe of WHAT Tom? - Vicki Jan 24, 18:21, 2002
  - First off BrianDC... - Vicki Jan 24, 00:19, 2002 +2
    - With all Due Respect, Vicki - Briandc Jan 24, 11:51, 2002
    - some contradictions. - someone Jan 24, 20:24, 2002 +1
      - What a ridiculous response! - Vicki Jan 25, 00:09, 2002 +1
        
        Re: What a ridiculous response! - someone Jan 25, 12:29, 2002 +2
        
        A silly question! - Bahman Jan 25, 13:22, 2002 +2
        
        Re: A silly question! - JAK Jan 25, 15:02, 2002 +1
        
        Thank you... - Bahman Jan 25, 16:30, 2002 +1
        
        Clarification, Bahman - JAK Jan 25, 22:14, 2002 +2
        
        Thanks again - Bahman Jan 25, 23:20, 2002
        Re: Clarification, Bahman - someone Jan 26, 22:30, 2002
        
        Re: A silly question! - someone Jan 26, 22:28, 2002
        
        Is Belief a Blue Light Special someone? - Vicki Jan 25, 20:08, 2002 +2
        
        Going to the source - Cal Jan 25, 22:21, 2002
        vicki, Bahman, Jak,.I correct myself; I screwed up - someone Jan 26, 22:27, 2002 +1
        
        Hey someone! - Vicki Jan 27, 16:35, 2002
  - Convert that Heathen!!! - Waspinatrix Jan 24, 08:07, 2002 +1
    - Wow, You Smashed the Hell out of that Straw Man! - Briandc Jan 24, 11:59, 2002
  - Re: A few passages on preaching - sojourner Jan 24, 12:39, 2002
- Re: Come on Vicki - someone Jan 23, 17:36, 2002
- Superbly stated, Brian. - JAK Jan 23, 18:40, 2002
- Re: Come on Vicki - sojourner Jan 24, 10:55, 2002 +2
  - Re: Come on Vicki - Briandc Jan 24, 11:38, 2002 +1
    - Re: Come on Vicki - sojourner Jan 24, 12:47, 2002 +1
      - Congratulations in the baby girl! - JAK Jan 25, 13:16, 2002
  - Burden of proof - JAK Jan 25, 13:14, 2002 +1
    - Re: Burden of proof - sojourner Jan 25, 18:28, 2002 +1
      - Re: Burden of proof - Cal Jan 25, 19:46, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Burden of proof - sojourner Jan 25, 22:46, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Burden of proof - JAK Jan 25, 23:15, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Burden of proof - sojourner Jan 26, 00:29, 2002 +2
        
        The fact I conceded - Cal Jan 26, 11:58, 2002
        A closer look, sojourner - JAK Jan 27, 21:50, 2002 +1
        
        Reply to Cal and JAK - sojourner Jan 28, 11:08, 2002 +2
        
        Reply to sojourner - JAK Jan 28, 22:30, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Reply to sojourner - sojourner Jan 29, 00:22, 2002
        
        Re: Reply to Cal and JAK - Cal Jan 29, 23:05, 2002 +1
        
        Clearly speaking - sojourner Jan 30, 11:54, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Clearly speaking - JAK Jan 31, 11:59, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Clearly speaking - sojourner Jan 31, 14:23, 2002 +1
        
        Worse than unclear - JAK Jan 31, 19:59, 2002
        
        Re: Clearly speaking - someone Jan 31, 15:17, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Clearly speaking - JAK Jan 31, 19:39, 2002
        
        Re: Clearly speaking - Cal Jan 31, 22:54, 2002 +1
        
        someone, JAK, and Cal - mikwut Feb 01, 12:37, 2002 +3
        
        Re: someone, JAK, and Cal - JAK Feb 01, 14:00, 2002 +1
        
        Re: someone, JAK, and Cal - mikwut Feb 01, 14:59, 2002 +1
        
        Re: someone, JAK, and Cal - JAK Feb 01, 21:17, 2002
        
        Re: someone, JAK, and Cal - someone Feb 01, 23:39, 2002 +1
        
        A question or two... - JAK Feb 02, 16:28, 2002 +1
        
        Re: A question or two... - someone Feb 02, 21:00, 2002
        
        Re: someone, JAK, and Cal - Cal Feb 01, 23:56, 2002 +1
        
        Re: someone, JAK, and Cal - mikwut Feb 02, 17:13, 2002 +3
        
        Re: someone, JAK, and Cal - Cal Feb 02, 18:31, 2002
        On daughters... - JAK Feb 02, 19:52, 2002
        p.s. to mikwut - Cal Feb 02, 20:17, 2002 +1
        
        Re: p.s. to mikwut - mikwut Feb 04, 14:55, 2002 +2
        
        mikwut - JAK Feb 05, 19:13, 2002 +1
        
        Re: mikwut - mikwut Feb 05, 19:22, 2002 +1
        
        Re: mikwut - JAK Feb 05, 19:53, 2002 +1
        
        Re: mikwut - mikwut Feb 05, 19:59, 2002 +3
        
        Re: mikwut - JAK Feb 05, 21:11, 2002
        Consider historical philosophers - JAK Feb 05, 21:35, 2002
        Foundations & Validity - JAK Feb 06, 15:26, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Foundations & Validity - mikwut Feb 08, 13:11, 2002
        Nice try JAK. - mikwut Feb 08, 13:14, 2002
        
        epist. of religion. - someone Feb 05, 22:50, 2002 +1
        
        Re: epist. of religion. - mikwut Feb 08, 12:48, 2002 +1
        
        Re: epist. of religion. - someone Feb 08, 15:47, 2002 +1
        
        Re: epist. of religion. - mikwut Feb 09, 09:45, 2002
        
        Re: Burden of proof - Cal Jan 26, 00:04, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Burden of proof - sojourner Jan 26, 00:39, 2002
Theres more to it than that... - Tom Kraus Jan 23, 17:02, 2002 +2
- Absolutely - SciGirl Jan 23, 17:27, 2002 +2
  - I'm with ya, SciGirl - Tom Kraus Jan 23, 18:55, 2002
  - I'm religious, and I haven't ... - Zoe Jan 23, 19:41, 2002 +1
    - Come on! - SciGirl Jan 24, 12:17, 2002 +2
      - The Tyranny of the Majority - Maude Jan 24, 14:25, 2002 +1
        
        Re: The Tyranny of the Majority - Bahman Jan 24, 18:57, 2002 +2
        
        How about... - Alf Omega Jan 24, 19:46, 2002 +1
        
        Elaborate please... - Bahman Jan 24, 21:12, 2002 +1
        
        Minimalism and constitutionality - Alf Omega Jan 25, 11:57, 2002 +2
        
        Re: Minimalism and constitutionality - Bahman Jan 25, 13:16, 2002 +1
        
        Belly-aching, complexity, and power - Alf Omega Jan 25, 13:40, 2002 +1
        
        You didn't address the 'enviornment' issue?! n/t - Bahman Jan 25, 14:19, 2002 +1
        
        Private environmentalism - Alf Omega Jan 25, 15:13, 2002 +1
        
        History? - Bahman Jan 25, 16:21, 2002 +1
        
        No forgetting, convenient or otherwise - Alf Omega Jan 25, 17:53, 2002 +1
        
        I guess... - Bahman Jan 25, 18:10, 2002
        
        Re: Minimalism and constitutionality - Maude Jan 25, 17:30, 2002 +1
        
        Taxation and social stability - Alf Omega Jan 25, 18:21, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Taxation and social stability - Maude Jan 25, 22:06, 2002 +1
        
        Post-war demographics - Alf Omega Jan 26, 00:05, 2002
        
        Re: The Tyranny of the Majority - Maude Jan 24, 20:11, 2002 +1
        
        First the principle - Bahman Jan 24, 21:08, 2002 +1
        
        Re: First the principle - Maude Jan 24, 22:02, 2002 +1
        
        Going deeper! - Bahman Jan 24, 22:21, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Going deeper! - Maude Jan 24, 23:31, 2002 +2
        
        Life is not fair! - Bahman Jan 25, 00:21, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Life is not fair! - Maude Jan 25, 11:47, 2002 +1
        
        Other cultures? - Bahman Jan 25, 12:56, 2002 +1
        
        Re: Other cultures? - Maude Jan 25, 17:23, 2002 +1
        
        No, no,... - Bahman Jan 25, 18:08, 2002 +1
        
        Re: No, no,... - Maude Jan 25, 21:58, 2002 +1
        
        Twas... - Bahman Jan 25, 23:27, 2002
        
        Some details -