thoughts about this - Ryan Mar 12, 00:24, 2002 +2 Well, then, here are my thoughts - Ryan Mar 12, 23:20, 2002 +1 Re: Well, then, here are my thoughts - samantha Mar 13, 22:11, 2002

Nephites... when did location doctrine change? - shooter Mar 10, 22:03, 2002 +1 Re: Nephites... when did location doctrine change? - Nevo Mar 11, 16:31, 2002

...how fervent their hatreds - Diehl Mar 10, 21:47, 2002 +6 Re: ...how fervent their hatreds - Martin Mar 10, 22:55, 2002 +1 Lurking, but laughing! - Çhâñgelîñg Mar 11, 05:48, 2002 Re: ...how fervent their hatreds - Christopher Mar 11, 04:07, 2002 I appreciate your post, Diehl - Gunnar Mar 17, 06:28, 2002 +1 Just as I appreciate YOUR post, Gunnar! - Martin Mar 17, 22:53, 2002 +1 Thank you Martin! - Gunnar Mar 18, 01:27, 2002

Truth? - Bubbles Mar 10, 14:55, 2002 +13 Re: Truth? - Diehl Mar 10, 17:45, 2002 +1 Re: Truth? - Bubbles Mar 10, 19:46, 2002 +3 Re: Truth? - Çhâñgelîñg Mar 10, 20:16, 2002 Re: Truth? - Diehl Mar 10, 21:08, 2002 Re: Truth? - Martin Mar 10, 23:33, 2002 Re: Truth? - shooter Mar 10, 22:06, 2002 +1 Huh?? - Martin Mar 11, 00:55, 2002 +2 Double wassat??? - Çhâñgelîñg Mar 11, 05:35, 2002 Book of Mormon reference - Alf Omega Mar 12, 00:56, 2002 +2 Re: Book of Mormon reference - Martin Mar 12, 01:23, 2002 Re: Book of Mormon reference - laurie Mar 12, 19:46, 2002 +1 Beats me! - Alf Omega Mar 12, 23:36, 2002 Re: Truth? - Jerome Mar 11, 21:16, 2002

mikwut vs. the Empiricists; Advancing the Debate - Martin Mar 08, 22:06, 2002 +127 MRI: spiritual experience-brain (links for Kevin) - The Vines Mar 08, 23:39, 2002 +3 Re: MRI: spiritual experience-brain - Martin Mar 09, 00:09, 2002 The height of arrogance Vines! - mikwut Mar 11, 01:35, 2002 +1 No offense intended-Let's look real close Mikwut!! - The Vines Mar 11, 23:39, 2002 +2 Thank you, no offense taken... - mikwut Mar 12, 01:03, 2002 +1 Its hard to believe quite frankly... - The Vines Mar 12, 18:56, 2002 +1 Re: Its hard to believe quite frankly... - mikwut Mar 14, 13:16, 2002 +1 Thank You - The Vines Mar 17, 16:00, 2002 Good post, Vines! (but a VERY minor nit) - Martin Mar 12, 03:04, 2002 +1 No such thing as "Objective Experience" - The Vines Mar 12, 19:44, 2002 Thanks, Vines! - Kevin Mar 11, 19:30, 2002 Since y'all seem to feel free to speak for Mikwut, - Zoe Mar 09, 03:43, 2002 +3 What an anti-factual pseudo-intellectual farce! - Martin Mar 09, 04:35, 2002 +1 Thank you both for so graciously providing... - Zoe Mar 09, 17:44, 2002 Hit and Run... Dodge the Bullet... - The Vines Mar 09, 10:53, 2002 Zoe... - mikwut Mar 11, 01:36, 2002 +1 Self-flattering delusions - Martin Mar 11, 02:57, 2002 +2 (null post) (no text) - Martin Mar 11, 05:25, 2002 Re: Self-flattering delusions - mikwut Mar 11, 13:32, 2002 +1 Will you ever own your faith, mikwut? - Martin Mar 15, 00:03, 2002 here it goes...part 1 - someone Mar 09, 04:42, 2002 +2 (brief aside for now) - Martin Mar 09, 05:06, 2002 +2 Re: (brief aside for now) - Gunnar Mar 10, 04:37, 2002 +2 Why do you and Martin refuse to take Mikwut ... - Zoe Mar 10, 14:22, 2002 +2 On Zoe, mikwut, postmodernism, and Richard Rorty - Martin Mar 11, 00:26, 2002 +1 I'm well-aware of post-modernism - ya moron- - Zoe Mar 11, 01:41, 2002 +1 Good Bob are you ever IGNORANT!! - Martin Mar 11, 02:09, 2002 +1 As predicted: no list. - Zoe Mar 11, 18:30, 2002 Points of disagreement. - Gunnar Mar 13, 03:54, 2002 +1 Re: Points of disagreement. - mikwut Mar 13, 22:47, 2002 +1 Re: Points of disagreement. - Gunnar Mar 17, 04:34, 2002 Re: (brief aside for now) - mikwut Mar 11, 02:28, 2002 +1 sarcastic response makes me a believer again! - Craig C. Mar 11, 23:19, 2002 +1 Re: sarcastic response makes me a believer again! - mikwut Mar 11, 23:46, 2002 +1 signs of repentance - Craig C. Mar 12, 01:41, 2002 +1 Re: signs of repentance - mikwut Mar 14, 12:58, 2002 moderate aside - someone Mar 10, 19:09, 2002 Re: here it goes...part 1 - Martin Mar 11, 03:33, 2002 +2 Re: here it goes...part 1 - mikwut Mar 11, 13:43, 2002 +1 Disingenuous sophistry! - Martin Mar 12, 02:50, 2002 Re: here it goes...part 1 - someone Mar 11, 22:25, 2002 +1 Re: here it goes...part 1 - Martin Mar 12, 00:09, 2002 part 2 Dogmatism - someone Mar 10, 19:12, 2002 +2 Re: part 2 Dogmatism - mikwut Mar 11, 01:36, 2002 Re: part 2 Dogmatism - Martin Mar 11, 05:08, 2002 +2 Re: part 2 Dogmatism - mikwut Mar 11, 13:19, 2002 +1 Well-said Mikwut! Bravo! - Zoe Mar 11, 18:47, 2002 +1 Cogent??? - Martin Mar 11, 20:20, 2002 +1 A week ago you begged me to explain Mikwut's posts - Zoe Mar 11, 23:09, 2002 +1 My only "begging" was for you to STOP... - Martin Mar 12, 01:41, 2002 +1 Martin, ewe of all mammals,... - Zoe Mar 12, 11:58, 2002 Re: part 2 Dogmatism - someone Mar 11, 13:37, 2002 Re: mikwut vs. the Empiricists; - mikwut Mar 11, 01:33, 2002 +1 Some of mikwut's more egregious LIES! - Martin Mar 13, 05:49, 2002 +1 Martin's unfortunate misunderstandings.. - mikwut Mar 14, 01:41, 2002 +1 mikwut simply LIES to deny his LIES - Martin Mar 15, 03:39, 2002 Mr. mikwut Nude vs. the Empiricists, The Sketch - Martin Mar 12, 20:33, 2002 +1 So that's why you started the thread.... - mikwut Mar 14, 13:08, 2002 +1 A typically mukwitian post - Martin Mar 14, 21:36, 2002 +1 Re: A typically mukwitian post - mikwut Mar 15, 01:48, 2002 +1 Re: A typically mukwitian post - Martin Mar 15, 03:58, 2002 +1 TYPICAL WHO? - mikwut Mar 15, 20:35, 2002 +2 a question, Mikwut, - rdl Mar 15, 21:51, 2002 +2 (an aside to rdl) - Martin Mar 15, 23:51, 2002 +2 sorry, double post (no text) - rdl Mar 16, 07:50, 2002 +1 n/t posts? - Bahman Mar 16, 11:15, 2002 +2 Include no text in the message area for a n/t post (no text) - rpcman Mar 16, 12:18, 2002 +1 Thanks n/t - Bahman Mar 16, 16:27, 2002 +1 I guess I should've left it blank! n/t (no text) - Bahman Mar 16, 16:31, 2002 Another question, rpcman - Bahman Mar 16, 18:36, 2002 +1 No problem... - Bahman Mar 16, 18:40, 2002 +1 Re: No problem... - rpcman Mar 16, 20:35, 2002 Re: (aside back to Martin) - rdl Mar 16, 07:54, 2002 +1 To rdl on "open-mindedness" - Martin Mar 18, 05:21, 2002 +1 Re: To rdl on "open-mindedness" - rdl Mar 18, 07:25, 2002 Re: a question, Mikwut, - mikwut Mar 16, 11:36, 2002 +3 Subjective? - Bahman Mar 16, 11:46, 2002 +1 Re: Subjective? - mikwut Mar 16, 12:22, 2002 +1 Round or Pancake?! - Bahman Mar 16, 12:54, 2002 +1 Re: Round or Pancake?! - mikwut Mar 16, 13:34, 2002 +2 Say what? - Bahman Mar 16, 13:42, 2002 Re: Round or Pancake?! - JAK Mar 16, 14:19, 2002 Your language barrier - JAK Mar 16, 13:52, 2002 a response...finally - rdl Mar 17, 10:45, 2002 +4 hey - someone Mar 17, 12:29, 2002 +1 Re: hey, back atcha - rdl Mar 17, 17:33, 2002 +1 Re: hey, back atcha - someone Mar 18, 11:38, 2002 Re: a response...finally - mikwut Mar 18, 00:03, 2002 +2 Re: brief response - rdl Mar 18, 08:22, 2002 an attempt at a response... - rdl Mar 18, 19:01, 2002 Re: a response...finally - Martin Mar 18, 06:14, 2002 +2 Re: incorrect on all counts... - rdl Mar 18, 08:15, 2002 Re: a response...finally - mikwut Mar 18, 15:53, 2002 rdl dives into the abyss! - Martin Mar 19, 06:11, 2002 +1 Re: rdl dives into the abyss! - rdl Mar 19, 16:50, 2002 +1 Thank you, rdl, for your kindness - Martin Mar 20, 06:28, 2002 +1 awe geez, Martin. - rdl Mar 20, 10:47, 2002 mikwut continues to lie and deny the truth - Martin Mar 15, 23:29, 2002 +3 Re: mikwut continues to lie and deny the truth - mikwut Mar 16, 12:38, 2002 +1 Re: mikwut continues to lie and deny the truth - JAK Mar 16, 14:48, 2002 +1 Let's please not misread mikwut when he's clear-- - Cal Mar 16, 16:59, 2002 +2 Re: Just what does mikwut intend? - JAK Mar 16, 18:57, 2002 +2 testing - Cal Mar 16, 20:43, 2002 +1 Re: testing - JAK Mar 16, 21:20, 2002 Re: Just what does mikwut intend? - Cal Mar 16, 23:36, 2002 more +2 Well said Cal.... - mikwut Mar 18, 14:49, 2002 +1 Brief note - Cal Mar 22, 16:56, 2002 +2 Re: Brief note (no text) - mikwut Mar 23, 14:07, 2002 Re: Brief note - mikwut Mar 24, 14:50, 2002 +2 Re: Brief note - someone Mar 24, 20:21, 2002 +1 Re: Brief note - mikwut Mar 26, 00:35, 2002 A note on Plantiga's story - Cal Mar 24, 23:48, 2002 +1 Re: A note on Plantiga's story - mikwut Mar 25, 02:06, 2002 +2 Re: A note on Plantiga's story - Martin Mar 25, 02:50, 2002 +2 Yes. I agree with your assessment. n/t - The Vines Mar 25, 19:42, 2002 Re: A note on Plantiga's story (no text) - mikwut Mar 25, 23:25, 2002 Re: A note on Plantiga's story - Barbarian Mar 25, 23:20, 2002 +1 Martin, Vines, Cal and Barbarian - mikwut Mar 26, 00:16, 2002 +1 see my response page 1 n/t - The Vines Mar 26, 06:10, 2002 Re: mikwut continues to lie and deny the truth - JAK Mar 16, 19:21, 2002 Mikwut's hunger analogy - Gunnar Mar 17, 03:29, 2002 +1 hmmm.... - rdl Mar 17, 11:19, 2002

On a lighter note..what's wrong with this picture? - Tyler Mar 08, 03:40, 2002 +5 Was it a goblin - or God? - Çhâñgelîñg Mar 08, 05:52, 2002 Is that a poppy plant on the table??? - Christopher Mar 08, 19:36, 2002 What's wrong with this picture? - Martin Mar 08, 20:06, 2002 nothing.. - someone Mar 08, 21:31, 2002 Re: ..what's wrong with this picture? - shooter Mar 10, 22:12, 2002

The future of creation/evolution debate - Bahman Mar 07, 16:43, 2002 +43 not quite that simple - someone Mar 07, 22:23, 2002 +1 The future of creationists? - Bahman Mar 07, 22:57, 2002 +1 Re: The future of creationists? - someone Mar 08, 21:01, 2002 +2 Fair enough, thanks, n/t - Bahman Mar 09, 00:26, 2002 Re: The future of creationists? - Barbarian Mar 10, 01:36, 2002 Or maybe the reverse - Glen Mar 08, 13:09, 2002 +4 Not certainly the reverse - Bahman Mar 08, 16:04, 2002 +1 More than 2 choices?? - Diehl Mar 08, 22:16, 2002 +1 Re: More than 2 choices?? - Paul King Mar 09, 06:17, 2002 +1 Well put, thanks, n/t - Bahman Mar 09, 10:44, 2002 I think you are rejecting God! - The Vines Mar 08, 22:11, 2002 +1 Re: I think you are rejecting God! - Gunnar Mar 10, 05:05, 2002 +1 I agree - The Vines Mar 12, 20:38, 2002 +1 The embodiment of truth. - Gunnar Mar 17, 17:04, 2002 +1 Well said my friend!! nt - The Vines Mar 18, 08:24, 2002 FACT vs THEORY (for Glen and Diehl and others) - Martin Mar 09, 03:20, 2002 +3 Semantics again! - Bahman Mar 09, 13:00, 2002 Re: FACT vs THEORY (for Glen and Diehl and others) - Diehl Mar 09, 14:33, 2002 Well done, Martin. - Barbarian Mar 10, 01:55, 2002 +1 Thanks, Mr. Barbarian! I'm delighted you're back! - Martin Mar 11, 00:31, 2002 Re: Or maybe the reverse - Barbarian Mar 10, 01:52, 2002 Re: The future of creation/evolution debate - Bubbles Mar 10, 14:29, 2002 +7 Re: The future of creation/evolution debate - Diehl Mar 10, 17:10, 2002 Personal! - Bahman Mar 10, 19:16, 2002 I grieve for your great loss! - Martin Mar 11, 00:44, 2002 Ooops. Photo here. - Barbarian Mar 11, 17:28, 2002 Re: The future of creation/evolution debate - Barbarian Mar 11, 17:42, 2002 Re: The future of creation/evolution debate - Barbarian Mar 11, 17:55, 2002 Evidence - Barbarian Mar 11, 18:01, 2002 +1 I thought someone had asked for evidence - Barbarian Mar 13, 18:02, 2002 Re: The future of creation/evolution debate - laurie Mar 10, 21:48, 2002 +2 Definitions - Bahman Mar 10, 23:16, 2002 Adam? Eve? You're kidding, right? - Martin Mar 11, 00:50, 2002 +1 Re: Adam? Eve? You're kidding, right? - laurie Mar 11, 12:50, 2002 +1 Why did you duck my question, laurie? - Martin Mar 11, 22:56, 2002 +1 Re: Why did you duck my question, laurie? - laurie Mar 12, 11:16, 2002 +1 So now you decide to duck my questions FOREVER?? - Martin Mar 12, 19:31, 2002 Complexity - SciGirl Mar 12, 12:24, 2002 Re: The future of creation/evolution debate - Iwonder Mar 12, 13:16, 2002 Re: The future of creation/evolution debate - Ihopit Mar 15, 22:01, 2002 +2 Re: The future of creation/evolution debate - JAK Mar 15, 22:11, 2002 Look at the trend - Bahman Mar 16, 00:24, 2002

Remember me? - Vicki Mar 07, 15:42, 2002 +7 Martin - Vicki Mar 07, 19:07, 2002 You have my heartfelt sympathy, my friend! - Martin Mar 07, 19:11, 2002 +1 If - Vicki Mar 07, 23:19, 2002 +1 Re: If - lancslad Mar 08, 03:59, 2002 Best wishes for your future. - Çhâñgelîñg Mar 08, 05:10, 2002 Re: Remember me? - mikwut Mar 08, 10:51, 2002 Re: Remember me? - JAK Mar 08, 21:24, 2002

Allan Guth's theory of inflation points to God. - jesse Mar 07, 15:08, 2002 +18 3 points - rpcman Mar 07, 15:55, 2002 +1 Re: 3 points - jesse Mar 08, 15:49, 2002 +1 Profound Ignorance from our pseudo mathematician! - The Vines Mar 08, 23:28, 2002 +1 I think your response is also lacking logic! - jesse Mar 14, 14:59, 2002 +1 Not a chance! - The Vines Mar 20, 10:33, 2002 Somebody please kill me (complete) - Martin Mar 07, 23:02, 2002 +3 I feel your pain! (no text) - Aaron V. Mar 07, 23:13, 2002 Re: Somebody please kill me (complete) - jesse Mar 08, 15:28, 2002 +1 JESSE IS A COWARD!! - Martin Mar 09, 00:35, 2002 Don't you care for newlurkers? - jesse Mar 14, 15:13, 2002 +1 Why don't YOU care for rational engagement? - Martin Mar 14, 20:29, 2002 Good gracious! - Aaron V. Mar 08, 00:25, 2002 +1 That was my goof. I meant gravity. nt. - jesse Mar 08, 15:09, 2002 Proof a deity did not create the universe - Aaron V. Mar 08, 00:32, 2002 +1 What do you think? (for Martin as well) - The Vines Mar 09, 00:55, 2002 +1 Re: What do you think? (for Martin as well) - Martin Mar 09, 02:24, 2002 +1 I agree, and further - The Vines Mar 09, 11:14, 2002 Are you religious? - The Vines Mar 08, 22:45, 2002

Are Liberal LDS **REALLY** LDS? - Kevin Mar 07, 12:25, 2002 +12 What's that theology again? - Jenny Mar 07, 13:47, 2002 +1 Re: What's that theology again? - mikwut Mar 07, 23:55, 2002 Was Bruce R. McConkie a Liberal Mormon? - Nevo Mar 07, 16:39, 2002 +1 McConkie, Father of LDS Conservatives! - Kevin Mar 08, 16:21, 2002 +1 My thoughts - Nevo Mar 08, 19:51, 2002 +1 Good point! Also, a question... - Kevin Mar 11, 19:38, 2002 Of course not - Dennis Mar 07, 23:58, 2002 +1 A new Dennis?? - Martin Mar 09, 03:43, 2002 +1 Not new, but not him - Dennis Mar 09, 10:01, 2002 Re: Are Liberal LDS **REALLY** LDS? - shooter Mar 10, 22:21, 2002 Re: Are Liberal LDS **REALLY** LDS? - Mensch Mar 11, 14:09, 2002 +1 Thanks Mensch! - Kevin Mar 12, 12:57, 2002

Question about Sean Weakland and Dr. Card's doc - M Anderson Mar 06, 15:30, 2002 +1 response - rpcman Mar 06, 16:24, 2002

Martin, How do you answer? - jesse Mar 05, 16:10, 2002 +55 Well I'm grateful martin's on the board - Nigel Mar 05, 20:05, 2002 +2 Well I'm grateful NIGEL's on the board! - Martin Mar 05, 20:36, 2002 Yes, Martin is an asset to this board. - Barbarian Mar 10, 02:00, 2002 +1 Re: Yes, Martin is an asset to this board. - Martin Mar 11, 01:34, 2002 Fanaticism - Bahman Mar 05, 20:24, 2002 +1 Sounds good to me. I hate fanaticism too. nt. - jesse Mar 06, 15:25, 2002 Re: Martin, How do you answer? - Martin Mar 05, 20:26, 2002 +4 Don Trajello (the Priest) - Jenny Mar 05, 22:34, 2002 +1 ciao? - Douglas A... Mar 06, 13:37, 2002 +1 Re: ciao? - Jenny Mar 06, 15:27, 2002 +1 groupie? - Douglas A... Mar 07, 09:32, 2002 +1 Look, there goes another parallel, better catch it - Jenny Mar 07, 10:28, 2002 +1 Yes - Douglas A... Mar 07, 14:38, 2002 Re: Martin, How do you answer? - Karyn Mar 06, 14:08, 2002 And Jesse now ducks the reply - Martin Mar 06, 21:34, 2002 Re: Jesse, How do YOU answer? - JAK Mar 07, 15:57, 2002 +1 Many thanks, sir JAK! (no text) - Martin Mar 08, 00:37, 2002 Maybe you should try thinking about Martin's words - The Vines Mar 05, 21:50, 2002 +3 One word Vines - Vicki Mar 05, 22:14, 2002 Yes, try thinking about Martin's words - Ramona Mar 06, 12:39, 2002 +3 Say it ain't so, Ramona - Mensch Mar 06, 15:39, 2002 Thanks Ramona. Check my reply to Vines.NT. - jesse Mar 06, 16:47, 2002 Something not so good has happened between U2 - The Vines Mar 06, 17:52, 2002 Re: Maybe you should try thinking about Mart - jesse Mar 06, 16:21, 2002 +2 A disheartened interjection - Martin Mar 07, 00:52, 2002 +1 I'm definitely not cutting you a break. - jesse Mar 07, 16:16, 2002 +3 Science 5 - Goblintalk 0 (no text) - Çhâñgelîñg Mar 07, 17:49, 2002 Where are your eggs, "BaaaaD man"? - Martin Mar 07, 20:02, 2002 So are you a "Baaad Man" or are you r... - The Vines Mar 08, 22:59, 2002 A most dissapointing comment, jesse - JAK Mar 07, 16:26, 2002 +1 Methodological Naturalism - Barbarian Mar 10, 02:25, 2002 +1 Question - Ryan Mar 12, 00:02, 2002 +1 An agnostic defends God's honor - Martin Mar 12, 03:36, 2002 +1 Martin.... - Ryan Mar 12, 23:45, 2002 +2 What I came across - Ryan Mar 13, 01:34, 2002 Why do you show such disrespect for your God? - Martin Mar 13, 04:30, 2002 Re: Martin, How do you answer? - samantha Mar 06, 00:23, 2002 +1 Conclusions. - Çhâñgelîñg Mar 06, 01:56, 2002 +1 You can't beat that! - jesse Mar 06, 16:51, 2002 +1 Some examples of a "satisying" life - Martin Mar 06, 22:34, 2002 +3 Re: Martin sums it up Jesse! - Çhâñgelîñg Mar 06, 23:21, 2002 Re: Some examples of a "satisying" life - jesse Mar 07, 10:34, 2002 +1 Re: Some examples of a "satisying" life - Çhâñgelîñg Mar 07, 11:26, 2002 Well, my life is in the process of becoming.. - Barbarian Mar 10, 02:31, 2002 about Martin... - Douglas A... Mar 07, 09:49, 2002 +1 Douglas, please start taking your medicine again! - Martin Mar 07, 20:15, 2002 +1 a reasonable response - Douglas A... Mar 12, 13:47, 2002 +1 Open mike at a comedy club - Martin Mar 12, 19:43, 2002 2 comments: - Zoe Mar 07, 12:18, 2002 +2 Wannabee - GHI Mar 07, 20:47, 2002 +1 Ah! Mystery solved! - Zoe Mar 07, 22:22, 2002 +1 Zoe is more valuable as her constituent molecules - Martin Mar 08, 00:53, 2002 +1 Oh Martin! Where's your "dense" of hu... - Zoe Mar 08, 01:12, 2002 Zoe the babbling charlatan spews again - Martin Mar 08, 01:10, 2002 +1 Are you trying to tell me it doesn't feel good ... - Zoe Mar 08, 01:28, 2002

THINK (physics) - Douglas A... Mar 05, 10:14, 2002 +22 Whaaaaat? - The Vines Mar 05, 21:59, 2002 +1 Re: Whaaaaat? - Douglas A... Mar 06, 10:39, 2002 +1 More crackpottery from Douglas! - Martin Mar 06, 23:21, 2002 +1 Not quite - Aaron V. Mar 06, 23:54, 2002 +1 A bad idea that muon - The Vines Mar 07, 02:19, 2002 +1 Re: A bad idea that muon - Aaron V. Mar 07, 02:44, 2002 +2 Re: A bad idea that muon - Martin Mar 07, 04:41, 2002 +1 Of nuclear forces - Aaron V. Mar 07, 22:34, 2002 +1 Oops! What was I thinking? - Martin Mar 08, 01:40, 2002 Re: A bad idea that muon - The Vines Mar 07, 09:38, 2002 +1 Re: A bad idea that muon - Aaron V. Mar 07, 22:58, 2002 +1 E=MC2 - The Vines Mar 08, 08:10, 2002 +1 Be prepared - use or lose it. - Douglas A... Mar 14, 09:57, 2002 +1 It's sort of imporant to contain fusion, Douglas - Martin Mar 14, 20:58, 2002 +2 Thanks ! n/t - The Vines Mar 20, 10:41, 2002 Necessity is the mother of invention. - Douglas A... Mar 21, 11:19, 2002 +1 And ignorance is the mother of deception - Martin Mar 22, 02:53, 2002 +1 You must be desparate. - Douglas A... Mar 26, 10:15, 2002 Tiny bubbles; In the wine... - Martin Mar 06, 01:34, 2002 +2 ...but it is worth further study. (no text) - Douglas A... Mar 06, 13:11, 2002 In addition... - Aaron V. Mar 06, 22:38, 2002 +1 Re: In addition... - Douglas A... Mar 12, 14:04, 2002

Happy Birthday to Vicki! - Martin Mar 04, 19:33, 2002 +5 Happy Birthday Vicki!!! - Bubbles Mar 04, 20:22, 2002 +1 Re: Happy Birthday Vicki!!! - Vicki Mar 05, 22:04, 2002 Many happy returns - Alf Omega Mar 04, 20:25, 2002 +1 Re: Many happy returns - Vicki Mar 05, 22:09, 2002 Party Marty? - Vicki Mar 05, 21:10, 2002

question for all - jo hill Mar 04, 11:35, 2002 +42 Re: question for all - rpcman Mar 04, 12:31, 2002 Re: question for all - Mensch Mar 04, 15:28, 2002 +1 BY and JS moderates for their time - Kevin Mar 04, 16:15, 2002 +1 Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - Martin Mar 05, 05:56, 2002 +3 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - mikwut Mar 05, 10:29, 2002 +3 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - JAK Mar 05, 12:16, 2002 +1 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - mikwut Mar 05, 14:36, 2002 +1 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - JAK Mar 05, 22:17, 2002 +1 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - mikwut Mar 06, 01:44, 2002 +1 Objectivity and knowing - JAK Mar 07, 11:03, 2002 +1 Re: Objectivity and knowing - mikwut Mar 07, 20:33, 2002 +2 Re: Objectivity and knowing - JAK Mar 07, 22:08, 2002 +2 Re: Objectivity and knowing - mikwut Mar 08, 01:14, 2002 +1 Re: Objectivity and knowing - JAK Mar 08, 12:21, 2002 +1 Re: Objectivity and knowing - mikwut Mar 08, 15:24, 2002 +1 Re: Objectivity and knowing - Craig C. Mar 08, 19:19, 2002 Re: Objectivity and knowing - mikwut Mar 08, 01:15, 2002 +1 A duplicate post, mikwut (no text) - JAK Mar 08, 12:23, 2002 Of Objectivity (partial repost) - Martin Mar 09, 04:50, 2002 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - The Vines Mar 05, 22:30, 2002 +1 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - Martin Mar 05, 23:33, 2002 +1 To the contrary... - The Vines Mar 07, 00:21, 2002 +1 Persinger and Prophecy - Martin Mar 07, 04:33, 2002 +1 Re: Persinger and Prophecy - The Vines Mar 12, 21:30, 2002 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - Martin Mar 05, 22:54, 2002 +1 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - lancslad Mar 09, 19:28, 2002 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - Kevin Mar 05, 11:23, 2002 +1 Re: Products of their time, or Prophets of God? - Martin Mar 05, 23:14, 2002 Time for a sustaining vote... - rpcman Mar 05, 12:23, 2002 +1 can I add Bob Marley? (no text) - Christopher Mar 05, 15:29, 2002 Men are men - The Vines Mar 05, 22:20, 2002 +2 A more parsimonious explanation (are we not men?) - Martin Mar 05, 23:58, 2002 +2 William of Ockham - Mensch Mar 06, 12:22, 2002 +1 Re: William of Ockham - Martin Mar 07, 00:57, 2002 +1 Re: William of Ockham - Mensch Mar 07, 10:27, 2002 Perhaps - The Vines Mar 07, 00:29, 2002 +1 But what of scripture? - Martin Mar 07, 01:05, 2002 +1 Re: But what of scripture? - The Vines Mar 07, 02:01, 2002 Re: Men are men - Mensch Mar 06, 12:25, 2002 +1 Actually... - The Vines Mar 07, 00:41, 2002 +1 Re: Actually... - Mensch Mar 08, 17:26, 2002 +1 Re: Actually... - The Vines Mar 08, 23:53, 2002

theology's missing link - Christopher Mar 03, 13:40, 2002 +7 Interesting points - The Vines