dna vs bom - amj2001 May 25, 07:14, 2003 +20 Thanks for these interesting links (no text) - Craig C. May 25, 13:44, 2003 Re: dna vs bom - Mark May 27, 17:53, 2003 +2 Re: dna vs bom - dan Jun 11, 10:39, 2003 +2 Re: dna vs bom - Craig C. Jun 11, 23:49, 2003 +1 Guns, Germs, and Steel - phishhead Jun 12, 03:00, 2003 +2 Re: Guns, Germs, and Steel - Craig C. Jun 12, 09:41, 2003 +1 Oops! - phishhead Jun 12, 13:13, 2003 Re: Guns, Germs, and Steel - Gunnar Jun 14, 16:51, 2003 ditto what Craig said - phishhead Jun 12, 02:45, 2003 +3 Re: ditto what Craig said (no text) - dan Jun 13, 14:26, 2003 OOPS! - dan Jun 13, 14:38, 2003 +2 The Big Picture - Craig C. Jun 14, 00:46, 2003 +1 Re: The Big Picture - dan Jun 16, 14:43, 2003 +1 Re: The Big Picture - Craig C. Jun 17, 01:35, 2003 +1 Re: The Big Picture - dan Jun 17, 12:09, 2003 +1 Re: The Big Picture - Craig C. Jun 17, 13:17, 2003 Re: OOPS! - phishhead Jun 14, 02:04, 2003 phish: "dan" isn't "Dan/nofaith&... - Martin Jun 18, 06:13, 2003 See above response (no text) - Craig C. Jun 14, 01:42, 2003

Mormonism=Christian Cult (making my case) - Victoria! May 24, 15:37, 2003 +75 God : Mormonism vs Christianity - Victoria! May 24, 15:51, 2003 +3 Christ : Mormonism vs Christianity - Victoria! May 24, 16:02, 2003 +1 Re: Christ : Mormonism vs Christianity - nofaith May 25, 18:14, 2003 +2 Yup, they do contradict - Victoria! May 25, 18:37, 2003 +1 list of contradicitons from 2think - Artem May 26, 21:57, 2003 +1 No Artem - Victoria! May 26, 22:26, 2003 +2 Fine, but.. - Artem May 26, 22:57, 2003 Shift the debate - JAK May 27, 00:21, 2003 Sects & Doctrine - JAK May 25, 21:41, 2003 +1 Re: They would call him insane - Victoria! May 26, 01:34, 2003 +1 AND - Ramona May 30, 18:57, 2003 Man : Mormonism vs Christianity - Victoria! May 24, 16:16, 2003 +1 Re: Man : Mormonism vs Christianity - nofaith May 25, 18:24, 2003 +1 You're right, Dan, these contradict as well - Victoria! May 25, 18:39, 2003 Salvation : Mormonism vs Christianity - Victoria! May 24, 16:27, 2003 +1 Re: Salvation : Mormonism vs Christianity - nofaith May 25, 18:33, 2003 +1 My reply might be characterized as "witne... - Victoria! May 25, 18:41, 2003 A note on the side, for Dan - Victoria! May 24, 17:27, 2003 I'll reply here soon (no text) - nofaith May 25, 15:43, 2003 +1 Thanks and if you want - Victoria! May 25, 16:38, 2003 +1 Checklist for "cults" - Victoria! May 25, 16:49, 2003 +2 Or, Check list for most Christian denominations - JAK May 25, 20:10, 2003 Here's the lead in to the link on cults - Victoria! May 25, 20:53, 2003 Re: Mormonism=Christian Cult (making my case) - nofaith May 25, 17:56, 2003 +1 Extending thought with you, Dan - JAK May 25, 21:07, 2003 +1 So there I was, folks... - Victoria! May 25, 22:15, 2003 +1 Can you grow? - JAK May 26, 00:56, 2003 +1 What do you think of my series of analysis,JAK? - Victoria! May 26, 01:01, 2003 +1 Re: What do you think of my series of analysis,JAK - JAK May 26, 01:59, 2003 +1 Ah, I stayed up all night just for this moment - Victoria! May 26, 02:13, 2003 +1 You shouldn’t stay up all night! - JAK May 26, 20:12, 2003 +1 Re: You shouldn’t stay up all night! - Victoria! May 26, 22:21, 2003 +1 Response to Victoria's comments - JAK May 27, 20:14, 2003 +1 Putting up the "closed" sign - Victoria! May 27, 22:25, 2003 +2 But the issues remain - JAK May 29, 23:46, 2003 +1 BM Superior to Bible - nofaith May 30, 05:51, 2003 +1 Re: BM Superior to Bible - JAK May 30, 23:55, 2003 +1 Re: BM Superior to Bible - nofaith May 31, 06:40, 2003 +1 Thanks for clarification, Dan! - JAK May 31, 22:33, 2003 Re: Putting up the "closed" sign - Ramona May 30, 19:16, 2003 +2 The shoppe - Ramona May 30, 19:46, 2003 +1 Re: The shoppe - JAK May 31, 00:06, 2003 Multiplicity - JAK May 31, 00:16, 2003 How and why I came to it, Dan - Victoria! May 25, 19:48, 2003 +1 Where to start... - nofaith May 25, 21:32, 2003 +1 Re: Where to start...really! - Victoria! May 25, 22:50, 2003 +2 Quick definition of "contradiction" - Victoria! May 25, 22:57, 2003 Re: Where to start...really! - Ramona May 30, 19:30, 2003 Mormonism=Christian Cult - nofaith May 25, 21:40, 2003 +1 I considered that long ago, Dan - Victoria! May 25, 22:52, 2003 I'm sorry, Victoria. . . - Gunnar May 26, 04:01, 2003 +1 You aren't "listening", Gunnar - Victoria! May 26, 16:07, 2003 +4 Nutshell, Gunnar! - Victoria! May 26, 16:42, 2003 Re: You aren't "listening", Gunnar - Craig C. May 26, 16:54, 2003 +1 Sheesh! Yourself, Craig - Victoria! May 26, 21:15, 2003 +1 Yes scriptures are subject to interpretation - Craig C. May 27, 00:03, 2003 +1 I'll give you this much of a reply, Craig - Victoria! May 27, 00:33, 2003 The problem, Vicki - nofaith May 26, 17:02, 2003 +1 Dan... - Victoria! May 26, 21:32, 2003 Defining "Christianity" - Artem May 26, 19:28, 2003 +2 Re: Defining "Christianity" - JAK May 26, 20:34, 2003 +2 Re: Defining "Christianity" - Artem May 26, 20:53, 2003 No, JAK - Victoria! May 26, 21:40, 2003 +1 Failure of rejoinder -- again - JAK May 26, 23:39, 2003 Nonsense, Artem - Victoria! May 26, 21:36, 2003 +1 free as a bird - Artem May 26, 21:47, 2003 +1 Then, I'll assume you - Victoria! May 26, 22:29, 2003 +1 Huh??? - Artem May 26, 22:40, 2003 Setting the record straight - nofaith May 27, 00:32, 2003 +1 Re: Setting the record straight - Gunnar May 28, 07:52, 2003 Using the bible, - johny May 27, 02:49, 2003 +1 Re: Using the bible, - Mat May 28, 23:47, 2003 +1 Let's FINISH this - Victoria! May 29, 01:09, 2003 definition games vs. substance - Fer-de-lance May 31, 21:43, 2003

Are Mormons Christian? - nofaith May 23, 15:31, 2003 +102 I'm here, as I said - Victoria! May 23, 18:16, 2003 +2 Re: I'm here, as I said - nofaith May 23, 19:18, 2003 +1 Let's talk - Victoria! May 23, 20:41, 2003 +1 Re: Let's talk - nofaith May 23, 22:08, 2003 +1 Like telephone tag, only in cyberspace - Victoria! May 23, 22:15, 2003 better phrasing of my questions - nofaith May 23, 20:39, 2003 +2 I want to smack you - Victoria! May 23, 20:53, 2003 +1 Re: I want to smack you - nofaith May 23, 21:05, 2003 Three questions, three answers - Victoria! May 23, 22:10, 2003 +1 Re: Three questions, three answers - nofaith May 23, 22:30, 2003 +2 Re: Three questions, three answers - Victoria! May 23, 22:43, 2003 +3 logging off for tonight, Dan - Victoria! May 23, 22:57, 2003 +1 WAKE UP, VICTORIA ! (no text) - JAK May 23, 23:06, 2003 +1 Hi honey, I'm back - Victoria! May 23, 23:10, 2003 +1 Insomnia - JAK May 23, 23:49, 2003 Attempts at narrow definition - JAK May 23, 23:04, 2003 Re: Three questions, three answers - nofaith May 23, 23:42, 2003 +1 Martin Luther - Victoria! May 24, 11:27, 2003 +2 Abraham and Egyptian Hieroglyphics - Gunnar May 24, 13:37, 2003 +1 Re: Abraham and Egyptian Hieroglyphics - Victoria! May 24, 13:59, 2003 +1 Thanks for the Kind words, Victoria! - Gunnar May 26, 02:56, 2003 +1 Re: Thanks for the Kind words, Victoria! - Craig C. May 28, 22:29, 2003 +1 This "fiesty little fire-ball" is - Victoria! May 29, 01:12, 2003 You still fail to answer my questions - nofaith May 25, 07:02, 2003 +1 I can't answer your question, Dan - Victoria! May 25, 13:39, 2003 +2 Re: I can't answer your question, Dan - nofaith May 25, 15:29, 2003 +1 In a word - Victoria! May 25, 16:31, 2003 +1 Bible belief - Craig C. May 25, 17:07, 2003 +1 Out the door - Victoria! May 25, 18:25, 2003 +1 Disqualification is the plan - Craig C. May 25, 19:05, 2003 +1 Here's the strategy, Craig - Victoria! May 25, 20:44, 2003 +2 Re: The Strategy - JAK May 25, 21:53, 2003 Here's the problem, Vicki - Craig C. May 25, 22:49, 2003 +1 Sweet William - Victoria! May 25, 23:03, 2003 Astounding lack of knowledge! - JAK May 25, 19:14, 2003 Requirements? - JAK May 23, 23:46, 2003 +2 Re: Requirements? - nofaith May 24, 02:32, 2003 +1 Word snares and invitations, Dan - Victoria! May 24, 14:21, 2003 +1 Taking it to the top, Dan - Victoria! May 24, 15:12, 2003 oh stop it, JAK - Victoria! May 24, 11:23, 2003 +1 Incorrect Focus - JAK May 24, 21:52, 2003 +1 Misdirected expectations - Victoria! May 24, 22:22, 2003 +1 Avoiding Evasion - JAK May 24, 23:39, 2003 Christianity -- the Larger Picture - JAK May 23, 22:42, 2003 +1 Hey, this is a closed thread ;-) - Victoria! May 23, 23:08, 2003 +1 Re: Hey, this is a closed thread ;-) - JAK May 24, 00:00, 2003 Buddhas for Jesus - Another Bob May 23, 23:26, 2003 Summing up - nofaith May 23, 23:43, 2003 +1 Re: Summing up - JAK May 24, 00:10, 2003 +1 Stop playing word games, JAK (Dan read) - Victoria! May 24, 11:39, 2003 +4 Polytheism, Dan - Victoria! May 24, 11:43, 2003 +1 Re: Polytheism, Dan - nofaith May 25, 06:55, 2003 Some Focus on Points - JAK May 24, 22:47, 2003 +1 Feel free to remain on topic - Victoria! May 24, 22:54, 2003 +2 Repost of my unanswered questions, JAK - Victoria! May 24, 23:09, 2003 +1 Let's deal with your questions - JAK May 25, 11:40, 2003 On Topic - JAK May 25, 01:07, 2003 +1 Please answer the questions I posted, JAK - Victoria! May 25, 02:16, 2003 +1 The Issues - JAK Jun 01, 22:34, 2003 Re: Stop playing word games, JAK (Dan read) - nofaith May 25, 07:28, 2003 Victoria’s 10-point litmus test for “a Christian.” - JAK May 25, 19:59, 2003 Re: Are Mormons Christian? - amy May 24, 13:57, 2003 Christians members of the Church of Jesus Christ? - Fer-de-lance May 24, 14:15, 2003 +1 Re: Christians members of the Church of Jesus Chri - nofaith May 25, 07:00, 2003 FINAL WORDS - nofaith May 25, 17:32, 2003 +5 Very well put, Dan! (no text) - Craig C. May 25, 17:45, 2003 +1 Thanks, Craig! (no text) - nofaith May 25, 18:02, 2003 I challenge you, Dan - Victoria! May 25, 18:33, 2003 +3 Missing the point... - nofaith May 25, 18:46, 2003 Responsibility is yours, not Dan's - JAK May 25, 22:41, 2003 Vicki, that wasn't a response - Cal May 25, 23:12, 2003 +1 And you aren't following the dialogue, Cal - Victoria! May 25, 23:58, 2003 +2 The dialogue began with my post to Sarah Sue - Victoria! May 26, 00:02, 2003 +1 THIS is what Dan used to frame his definition, Cal - Victoria! May 26, 00:13, 2003 +1 Closing time - Cal May 26, 01:02, 2003 +1 Why am I not surprised, Cal? - Victoria! May 26, 01:05, 2003 +1 Aargh - Cal May 26, 01:53, 2003 +1 I want to beat you, Cal! - Victoria! May 26, 02:02, 2003 +1 It is entirely possible, Cal - Victoria! May 26, 02:05, 2003 +1 Cal - Victoria! May 26, 16:56, 2003 +1 Let's do this quick, Cal - Victoria! May 26, 21:09, 2003 +1 Re: Let's do this quick, Cal - Cal May 27, 16:06, 2003 +1 Quickie for Cal - Victoria! May 27, 17:04, 2003 +2 Re: Quickie for Cal - Cal May 27, 18:39, 2003 +1 Re: Quickie for Cal - Victoria! May 27, 20:26, 2003 +1 Re: Quickie for Cal - Cal May 28, 01:09, 2003 Re: Quickie for Cal - nofaith May 27, 19:27, 2003 What's legitimate about your tenth point? - Cal May 26, 00:35, 2003 +1 It wasn't my tenth "point", Cal - Victoria! May 26, 00:40, 2003 +2 Here, I'll categorize them for you, Cal - Victoria! May 26, 00:45, 2003 +2 Aside question,Cal - Victoria! May 26, 00:48, 2003 +1 Re: Aside question,Cal - Cal May 26, 01:34, 2003 +1 I'm glad you returned, Cal - Victoria! May 26, 01:38, 2003 Re: Here, I'll categorize them for you, Cal - Cal May 26, 01:39, 2003 +1 Holy Hannah, Cal - Victoria! May 26, 01:53, 2003 Because of this I took as point 10 - Cal May 26, 01:29, 2003 +1 I don't want your darn charity,Cal - Victoria! May 26, 01:46, 2003 Just read -- ELOQUENT!! (no text) - JAK May 25, 22:56, 2003 Wow! Eloquent and well put indeed! (no text) - Gunnar May 26, 01:15, 2003 Re: FINAL WORDS - Victoria! Jun 14, 20:41, 2003 Who is qualified to define the term "Chris... - Artem May 25, 21:07, 2003 +1 Re: Who is qualified to define the term "C... - JAK May 25, 22:05, 2003

Response for Cal - nofaith May 23, 04:06, 2003 +5 In case you missed this, Cal - nofaith May 25, 18:01, 2003 +1 Re: In case you missed this, Cal - Cal May 25, 20:00, 2003 Re: Response for Cal - Cal May 25, 22:07, 2003 +2 Re: Response for Cal - nofaith May 26, 01:50, 2003 Another response - nofaith May 26, 05:15, 2003

Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - phishhead May 23, 02:50, 2003 +35 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - jdog May 23, 14:39, 2003 +1 You should choose to believe in only the truth. - phishhead May 23, 16:17, 2003 +1 You should choose to believe in only the truth. - jdog May 25, 12:09, 2003 +1 You had it right in your first post. - phishhead May 26, 21:31, 2003 +1 hmmm. . . . - jdog May 27, 11:06, 2003 +1 Re: hmmm. . . . - Christopher May 27, 16:21, 2003 Evolution and the restoration - Cal May 23, 23:02, 2003 Excellent post, phishead! - Gunnar May 24, 13:13, 2003 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - fanpalm May 24, 14:45, 2003 +2 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - Craig C. May 24, 15:00, 2003 +1 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - fanpalm May 24, 15:28, 2003 +1 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - Craig C. May 24, 16:36, 2003 +3 Try this on for size, Craig - Victoria! May 24, 17:40, 2003 +1 Re: Try this on for size, Craig - Craig C. May 24, 17:59, 2003 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - fanpalm May 24, 18:59, 2003 +1 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - Craig C. May 24, 19:15, 2003 +1 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - fanpalm May 24, 19:34, 2003 +1 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - Craig C. May 24, 22:01, 2003 Re: Can evolution and LDS doctrine both be true? - fanpalm May 24, 21:43, 2003 No death before the fall? - phishhead May 25, 01:42, 2003 +2 Re: No death before the fall? - fanpalm May 25, 09:50, 2003 +1 Throwing out McConkie - phishhead May 26, 14:54, 2003 +1 Re: Throwing out McConkie - fanpalm May 26, 21:36, 2003 +2 Re: Throwing out McConkie - phishhead May 27, 05:00, 2003 +1 Re: Throwing out McConkie - fanpalm May 27, 11:18, 2003 +1 Re: Throwing out McConkie - Christopher May 27, 17:30, 2003 +1 Re: Throwing out McConkie - fanpalm May 28, 21:25, 2003 Re: Throwing out McConkie - jdog May 29, 10:50, 2003 Re: No death before the fall? - Gunnar May 26, 01:44, 2003 +1 Re: No death before the fall? - fanpalm May 26, 13:02, 2003 +2 Re: No death before the fall? - Craig C. May 26, 14:19, 2003 +1 Re: No death before the fall? - fanpalm May 26, 21:45, 2003 I didn't "fall away" from the church... - phishhead May 26, 15:16, 2003 +1 Re: I didn't "fall away" from the chu... - fanpalm May 26, 21:57, 2003 +1 Amen... - Christopher May 27, 17:35, 2003

Sarah Sue: Are Mormons Christians? - Victoria! May 22, 21:44, 2003 +6 aw c'mon, did she leave? (no text) - Victoria! May 23, 00:33, 2003 Re: Sarah Sue: Are Mormons Christians? - nofaith May 23, 04:36, 2003 +2 Start one, I'll reply (no text) - Victoria! May 23, 08:59, 2003 Re: Sarah Sue: Are Mormons Christians? - fatherslink Jun 04, 01:26, 2003 +1 World Religions - JAK Jun 04, 22:06, 2003 +1 Re: World Religions - fatherslink Jun 05, 01:15, 2003

Marathons on Sunday - fanpalm May 22, 13:05, 2003 +2 Re: Marathons on Sunday - Christopher May 27, 16:56, 2003 +1 Re: Marathons on Sunday - fanpalm May 30, 22:55, 2003

Can A Mormon Explain? - Sarah Sue May 21, 15:10, 2003 +67 worship music - Craig C. May 21, 15:33, 2003 +1 Re: worship music - Sarah Sue May 21, 16:10, 2003 +2 Re: worship music - sansfoy May 21, 16:42, 2003 Re: worship music - Craig C. May 21, 17:58, 2003 +1 Re: worship music - Sarah Sue May 22, 00:24, 2003 +1 Re: worship music - Craig C. May 22, 10:34, 2003 +1 Re: worship music - Sarah Sue May 22, 12:19, 2003 +1 Re: worship music - Craig C. May 22, 12:33, 2003 +1 Re: worship music - Sarah Sue May 22, 13:12, 2003 +1 Re: worship music - Craig C. May 22, 13:44, 2003 Notamormon, with a question - Victoria! May 21, 15:39, 2003 +2 Re: Notamormon, with a question - Sarah Sue May 21, 15:57, 2003 +2 ? - sansfoy May 21, 16:45, 2003 +1 Re: ? - Sarah Sue May 22, 00:15, 2003 +3 Re: ? - sansfoy May 22, 06:05, 2003 +1 Re: ? - Sarah Sue May 22, 11:42, 2003 +1 Re: ? - Craig C. May 22, 12:05, 2003 +1 Re: ? - Sarah Sue May 22, 13:20, 2003 +1 See my response above (no text) - Craig C. May 22, 13:48, 2003 Re: ? - nofaith May 22, 20:13, 2003 I'm with Dan - Gunnar May 23, 00:46, 2003 Re: Notamormon, with a question - Fer-de-lance May 21, 21:28, 2003 Re: Notamormon, with a question - Sarah Sue May 21, 23:57, 2003 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Fer-de-lance May 21, 16:29, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Sarah Sue May 21, 17:02, 2003 +2 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Craig C. May 21, 19:45, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Sarah Sue May 22, 00:20, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Craig C. May 22, 10:32, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Sarah Sue May 22, 12:30, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Fer-de-lance May 22, 13:41, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Sarah Sue May 22, 13:58, 2003 +2 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Craig C. May 22, 14:23, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Sarah Sue May 23, 03:00, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Craig C. May 23, 14:42, 2003 MoTab - Fer-de-lance May 22, 16:16, 2003 +2 Re: MoTab - Sarah Sue May 22, 16:31, 2003 Fer's list and what Baptists sing - Victoria! May 22, 18:19, 2003 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Fer-de-lance May 21, 20:29, 2003 Selling Snake Oil - sansfoy May 21, 16:49, 2003 +1 Re: Selling Snake Oil - Sarah Sue May 22, 00:39, 2003 +1 sin vs. mistakes - sansfoy May 22, 06:12, 2003 +1 Re: sin vs. mistakes - Sarah Sue May 22, 11:52, 2003 Can Sarah Sue Explain? - Bahman May 21, 17:40, 2003 +1 Re: Can Sarah Sue Explain? - Sarah Sue May 22, 00:49, 2003 +1 Now we have something to talk about! - Bahman May 22, 00:55, 2003 +1 Re: Now we have something to talk about! - Sarah Sue May 22, 02:32, 2003 +2 Re: Now we have something to talk about! - sansfoy May 22, 06:15, 2003 +1 Re: Now we have something to talk about! - Sarah Sue May 22, 12:31, 2003 No I'm not pulling your legs . . . - Bahman May 22, 12:46, 2003 +2 Re: No I'm not pulling your legs . . . - Sarah Sue May 22, 13:23, 2003 Interpreter on duty, Bahman (aside) - Victoria! May 22, 18:49, 2003 +1 Re: Interpreter on duty, Bahman (aside) - Bahman May 22, 19:58, 2003 +1 Okay, smart guy (aside) - Victoria! May 22, 20:39, 2003 +1 Re: Okay, smart guy (aside) - Bahman May 22, 21:53, 2003 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - nofaith May 21, 18:04, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Sarah Sue May 22, 00:54, 2003 Why Sarah Sue... - Fer-de-lance May 21, 21:38, 2003 Another question, Sarah Sue - Victoria! May 22, 01:07, 2003 +1 Re: Another question, Sarah Sue - Sarah Sue May 22, 01:37, 2003 +1 I don't buy it! - Gunnar May 22, 09:03, 2003 +1 Re: I don't buy it! - Sarah Sue May 22, 12:13, 2003 +3 I'm with Gunnar..... - Mat May 22, 19:36, 2003 Why no cross? - Victoria! May 22, 20:49, 2003 I'm with Gunnar, and Mat - nofaith May 22, 21:51, 2003 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - fanpalm May 22, 13:08, 2003 +1 Re: Can A Mormon Explain? - Sarah Sue May 22, 16:09, 2003 SISTER problems, NOTsongs - Victoria! May 22, 18:58, 2003

Why do people "listen" to ads? - Bahman May 20, 20:29, 2003 +8 That's their purpose - diehl May 22, 02:01, 2003 +2 Re: That's their purpose - Bahman May 22, 13:05, 2003 Re: That's their purpose - Another Bob May 22, 20:56, 2003 +1 Re: That's their purpose - Another Bob May 22, 21:22, 2003 +1 Another article - Another Bob May 22, 21:58, 2003 +1 Re: Another article - JAK May 22, 23:06, 2003 transfered from previous media thread - Christopher May 30, 18:17, 2003 +1 What is Objectivity? - Bahman May 30, 21:47, 2003

Molten rock - LDS_r_LIARS May 20, 14:44, 2003 +1 Re: Molten rock - fatherslink Jun 05, 01:22, 2003

Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Kevin May 19, 14:50, 2003 +20 My experience... - nofaith May 19, 16:26, 2003 +1 Re: My experience... - Kevin May 20, 14:15, 2003 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Cal May 19, 20:39, 2003 +1 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Kevin May 20, 14:51, 2003 +2 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Victoria! May 20, 17:44, 2003 +1 Hitting the nail on the head - Kevin May 22, 14:23, 2003 +1 For you, Kevin - Victoria! May 22, 19:13, 2003 +1 Thanks, Victoria - Kevin May 23, 12:23, 2003 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Cal May 20, 21:02, 2003 +1 Update - Kevin May 22, 14:31, 2003 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - LDS_r_LIARS May 20, 15:00, 2003 +2 Not accurate... - nofaith May 20, 19:08, 2003 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Fer-de-lance May 21, 00:17, 2003 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Otis May 21, 03:39, 2003 +1 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Kevin May 22, 14:03, 2003 +1 Best of luck to you... - Otis May 22, 18:23, 2003 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - sansfoy May 21, 16:54, 2003 +1 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Kevin May 22, 13:45, 2003 Re: Letting the Cat Out of the Bag, part 4 - Karyn May 27, 00:01, 2003 Concerned - Mark May 28, 00:27, 2003

St Augustus (mumble) Pelagius (BLAH!) - Another Bob May 17, 23:37, 2003 +1 Re: St Augustus (mumble) Pelagius (BLAH!) - Christopher May 29, 04:36, 2003

Ownership on human life. - Adada May 17, 05:08, 2003

Mass Media (again!) - Bahman May 15, 13:50, 2003 +28 Have you seen a sexy movie lately?! - Bahman May 15, 20:07, 2003 Dangers of limited expression - JAK May 15, 22:59, 2003 +1 Re: Dangers of limited expression - Bahman May 15, 23:35, 2003 +1 A few ownerships - JAK May 16, 21:45, 2003 +2 Re: A few ownerships - Victoria! May 16, 23:32, 2003 +1 Great! - JAK May 16, 23:38, 2003 Re: A few ownerships - Bahman May 17, 01:18, 2003 +1 Bahman, the ABC piece - Victoria! May 17, 20:08, 2003 +1 Re: Bahman, the ABC piece - Bahman May 17, 20:55, 2003 +1 Re: Bahman, the ABC piece - Another Bob May 18, 04:03, 2003 +1 Re: Bahman, the ABC piece - Bahman May 18, 12:26, 2003 +2 Re: Bahman, the ABC piece - Another Bob May 18, 19:21, 2003 +1 Wrong information - Bahman May 18, 22:42, 2003 +1 AAARGH mfm, @!"$&"$% - Another Bob May 19, 01:26, 2003 +1