Definitions Please? - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:57, 2002 +193 Define Agnostic (no text) - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:58, 2002 +4 Define Agnostic Theist (no text) - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:58, 2002 +3 Define Agnostic Atheist (no text) - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:58, 2002 +3 Define Atheist (no text) - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:59, 2002 +3 Define Soft Atheist (no text) - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:59, 2002 +3 Define Hard Atheist (no text) - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 08:00, 2002 +2 Re: Define Hard Atheist - diehl Sep 14, 09:47, 2002 Re: Define Hard Atheist - nofaith Sep 14, 13:48, 2002 Re: Define Soft Atheist - diehl Sep 14, 09:46, 2002 Re: Define Soft Atheist - nofaith Sep 14, 13:50, 2002 Re: Define Atheist - diehl Sep 14, 09:45, 2002 Re: Define Atheist - nofaith Sep 14, 12:15, 2002 Re: Define Agnostic Atheist - diehl Sep 14, 09:45, 2002 Re: Define Agnostic Atheist - nofaith Sep 14, 13:56, 2002 Re: Define Agnostic Theist - diehl Sep 14, 09:44, 2002 Re: Define Agnostic Theist - nofaith Sep 14, 13:58, 2002 Re: Define Agnostic - diehl Sep 14, 09:43, 2002 +2 WRONG!! - Martin Sep 15, 20:36, 2002 +2 Must have hit a nerve - diehl Sep 15, 22:54, 2002 +2 "Holy fuck", Martin? - Jersey Girl Sep 16, 04:01, 2002 Is there a term... - Martin Sep 16, 08:26, 2002 Re: WRONG!! - nofaith Sep 16, 06:58, 2002 +1 STILL wrong - Martin Sep 17, 18:36, 2002 To Dan and diehl and Vicki: The Proper Definition - Martin Sep 16, 10:17, 2002 +3 ...defoliate a 6-mile raduis... - diehl Sep 16, 10:34, 2002 +2 Thanks, diehl! (no text) - Martin Sep 16, 10:54, 2002 To Martin who is too lazy to read my posts - Jersey Girl Sep 16, 10:56, 2002 +1 I apologize for the knee-jerk, Marty (no text) - Jersey Girl Sep 16, 12:18, 2002 Re: The Proper Definition - nofaith Sep 16, 11:39, 2002 +5 Re: Definitions - JAK Sep 16, 11:55, 2002 +1 Let me run this by you JAK - Jersey Girl Sep 16, 12:02, 2002 +2 Question 2 - Jersey Girl Sep 16, 12:04, 2002 +2 Question 3 - Jersey Girl Sep 16, 12:06, 2002 +1 Question 4 - Jersey Girl Sep 16, 12:10, 2002 +1 Question 5 - Jersey Girl Sep 16, 12:13, 2002 +1 Question 6 - Jersey Girl Sep 16, 12:17, 2002 +1 Re: Some websites. - JAK Sep 18, 10:43, 2002 +2 Thank you again, JAK - Jersey Girl Sep 18, 11:20, 2002 +3 Point of Perspective - JAK Sep 21, 05:26, 2002 Aaargh!!! (revised) - Martin Sep 21, 20:56, 2002 Martin - Jersey Girl Sep 22, 11:40, 2002 Separating the wheat from the chaff - Martin Sep 19, 11:02, 2002 +1 Heart of definition problems & marg - JAK Sep 21, 09:25, 2002 +5 JAK, another definition - Jersey Girl Sep 21, 09:41, 2002 +2 Re: JAK, another definition - JAK Sep 21, 10:55, 2002 +2 I see what you mean, JAK - Jersey Girl Sep 21, 11:08, 2002 +1 Re: I see what you mean, JAK - JAK Sep 21, 12:14, 2002 +2 JAK, finally - Jersey Girl Sep 21, 12:33, 2002 More low-brow error (no text) - Martin Sep 21, 14:28, 2002 Such massive ignorance! - Martin Sep 21, 14:26, 2002 And back on the horse... - Jersey Girl Sep 21, 10:55, 2002 +2 And a brief p.s. JAK - Jersey Girl Sep 21, 11:17, 2002 Such uninformed and outright false blither! - Martin Sep 21, 15:02, 2002 JAK, your post is just more low-brow flatulence (no text) - Martin Sep 21, 14:15, 2002 How STUPIDLY anti-honest and anti-intellectual! - Martin Sep 21, 15:37, 2002 On JAK's anti-Catholic bigotry - Martin Sep 21, 20:31, 2002 JAK: A Comment... - Kevin Sep 22, 14:10, 2002 +1 Re: A Part I comment, Kevin - JAK Sep 24, 07:48, 2002 Re: Question 2 - nofaith Sep 17, 07:56, 2002 Considering your points/questions - JAK Sep 17, 09:00, 2002 +2 Thank you JAK - Jersey Girl Sep 17, 10:47, 2002 +1 Re: Thank you JAK - JAK Sep 17, 11:32, 2002 +2 Much of that is irrelevant! See my post... - Martin Sep 19, 12:11, 2002 C'mon, Martin - Jersey Girl Sep 19, 13:03, 2002 +1 Martin, I have - Jersey Girl Sep 19, 13:30, 2002 +1 (aside M) - Jersey Girl Sep 19, 14:35, 2002 None of JAK's def's of agnosticism are correct - Martin Sep 19, 11:54, 2002 +1 Your Faulty Reading - JAK Sep 21, 06:12, 2002 +1 Your deliberate distortions! - Martin Sep 21, 16:03, 2002 Further extension of definitions - JAK Sep 16, 12:15, 2002 +1 Thanks, JAK - Martin Sep 16, 15:04, 2002 Re: The Proper Definition - Martin Sep 16, 14:59, 2002 +1 Re: The Proper Definition - nofaith Sep 16, 23:57, 2002 +1 Re: The Proper Definition - Martin Sep 17, 18:38, 2002 +1 Re: The Proper Definition - nofaith Sep 17, 19:41, 2002 I see more than one definition, Martin - Jersey Girl Sep 17, 08:00, 2002 +1 Martin, here is what I was talking about - Jersey Girl Sep 17, 11:10, 2002 Dan, that's not correct! - Martin Sep 17, 18:37, 2002 huxley's agnosticism - marg Sep 17, 08:28, 2002 +4 Re: huxley's agnosticism - JAK Sep 17, 09:51, 2002 +1 You are mistaken, JAK! - Martin Sep 17, 18:39, 2002 +1 Re: Further Analysis - JAK Sep 17, 22:32, 2002 marg? - Jersey Girl Sep 17, 10:38, 2002 +2 Re: perspective - JAK Sep 17, 10:49, 2002 +2 Okay, perhaps I misunderstood - Jersey Girl Sep 17, 11:13, 2002 +2 Or???? - Jersey Girl Sep 17, 11:16, 2002 +1 For example - Jersey Girl Sep 17, 11:18, 2002 Re: Okay, perhaps I misunderstood - JAK Sep 17, 11:43, 2002 +2 Hooray! - Jersey Girl Sep 17, 11:49, 2002 Such utterly unjustified praise! - Martin Sep 17, 18:47, 2002 +1 Re: Such utterly unjustified praise! - JAK Sep 17, 22:00, 2002 +1 Martin, there are - Jersey Girl Sep 18, 13:10, 2002 That's sloppy thinking! - Martin Sep 17, 18:43, 2002 +1 Re: You misstate & garble - JAK Sep 19, 11:55, 2002 +1 I replied on point with no straw man argument - Martin Sep 19, 12:29, 2002 Re: marg? - marg Sep 17, 12:46, 2002 +1 Thanks marg, - Jersey Girl Sep 19, 06:11, 2002 OPINION is IRRELEVANT for formal terms! - Martin Sep 17, 18:11, 2002 +3 Re: OPINION is IRRELEVANT for formal terms! - marg Sep 18, 05:53, 2002 +1 Re: OPINION is IRRELEVANT for formal terms! - Martin Sep 18, 19:52, 2002 Questions on the unknowability of God - Cal Sep 18, 11:00, 2002 +3 I'd like to add a scenario for Martin - Jersey Girl Sep 18, 11:26, 2002 Parsimonious observation - Alf Omega Sep 18, 11:35, 2002 +1 Speaking of parsimony - Cal Sep 18, 12:30, 2002 Thanks for chance to further confirm my definition - Martin Sep 18, 19:01, 2002 +1 Seeking further clarification - Cal Sep 19, 12:12, 2002 +1 Re: Seeking further clarification - Martin Sep 19, 17:02, 2002 +1 One question for now - Cal Sep 20, 13:00, 2002 +4 if I understand you correctly - marg Sep 20, 14:59, 2002 +1 Understand correctly?? - Martin Sep 20, 16:43, 2002 +1 lol - marg Sep 20, 18:13, 2002 +1 marg, Vicki, JAK: PLEASE READ THIS - Martin Sep 21, 19:40, 2002 +1 martin: PLEASE READ THIS - marg Sep 22, 06:59, 2002 +1 Please read with much better COMPREHENSION! - Martin Sep 22, 12:06, 2002 +1 Tell me why..agnosticism is a worthwhile position - marg Sep 22, 15:46, 2002 +1 Such INANITY and SLOPPY-HEADED MUSH! - Martin Sep 26, 17:04, 2002 +1 Re: Such INANITY and SLOPPY-HEADED MUSH! - marg Sep 26, 17:21, 2002 +1 You ARE treating agnosticism as an argument!! - Martin Sep 26, 19:07, 2002 +1 Re: You ARE treating agnosticism as an argument!! - marg Sep 27, 07:45, 2002 +1 Word games - JAK Sep 27, 11:17, 2002 +1 Re: Word games - marg Sep 27, 14:32, 2002 Omnipotence doesn't allow the logically impossible - Martin Sep 20, 15:42, 2002 I love the interactions between you and Martin! - Gunnar Sep 20, 16:38, 2002 +1 Thanks! But please review your logic - Martin Sep 20, 17:21, 2002 +1 But Martin! - Gunnar Sep 22, 16:15, 2002 +1 We must stay within the proper domain - Martin Sep 26, 12:06, 2002 +1 about the god concept - marg Sep 26, 14:04, 2002 +2 and one more..same idea - marg Sep 26, 14:22, 2002 +1 Re: and one more..same idea - Martin Sep 26, 16:23, 2002 +1 Re: and one more..same idea - marg Sep 26, 17:23, 2002 +2 The first sensible post of yours and you quit!! - Martin Sep 26, 18:48, 2002 +1 I haven't quit - marg Sep 27, 04:41, 2002 Taking a 1-O discharge on this thread - Jersey Girl Sep 27, 03:50, 2002 OW! All traditional Christian sects believe that! - Martin Sep 26, 16:03, 2002 +1 nope still doesn't make sense - marg Sep 26, 16:57, 2002 +1 Error from sloppy usage of the word "knowl... - Martin Sep 26, 18:16, 2002 +1 bottom line - marg Sep 28, 04:26, 2002 +1 Re: bottom line - Martin Oct 01, 19:28, 2002 Ultra-short summary of my argument - Martin Sep 20, 17:41, 2002 +3 More terms needed - Fer-de-lance Sep 21, 14:56, 2002 +1 Re: More terms needed - Martin Sep 21, 16:35, 2002 But. . . - Gunnar Sep 22, 17:25, 2002 +1 "The map is not the territory" - Martin Sep 26, 12:36, 2002 Martin and Gunnar - Cal Sep 23, 09:59, 2002 +2 Looking forward to your further inputs. - Gunnar Sep 24, 15:43, 2002 Excellent, insightful questions! - Martin Sep 26, 19:54, 2002 +1 Kind of makes you wish for real time dialogue - Cal Sep 27, 13:40, 2002 +1 Re: Kind of makes you wish for real time dialogue - Martin Oct 01, 19:24, 2002 reply..part 1 - marg Sep 18, 14:50, 2002 "Formal" def's are useless, Martin - Jersey Girl Sep 18, 03:52, 2002 +1 On teaching, Martin - Jersey Girl Sep 18, 04:28, 2002 Re: Define Agnostic - nofaith Sep 14, 12:13, 2002 +1 Damn it, man, that is flat-out WRONG!! - Martin Sep 15, 20:33, 2002 +1 Re: Damn it, man, that is flat-out WRONG!! - nofaith Sep 16, 06:47, 2002 Re: Define Agnostic - marg Sep 19, 03:00, 2002 What I see... - diehl Sep 14, 09:22, 2002 +1 You need a teacher, diehl - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 09:35, 2002 +1 Better, I'll adjust your grade (no text) - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 09:44, 2002 +1 Your lucky I'm in a good mood... - diehl Sep 14, 09:50, 2002 +1 Your lucky it's me! - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 09:52, 2002 +2 Gold Star diehl! - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 09:58, 2002 Re: Hope that helps (no text) - diehl Sep 14, 09:59, 2002 Re: Definitions Please? - angelica Sep 14, 11:40, 2002 +1 Re: Definitions Please? - Martin Sep 15, 20:49, 2002 Re: Definitions Please? - nofaith Sep 14, 12:17, 2002 +1 You're probably right, Dan - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 13:13, 2002 +1 Re: You're probably right, Dan - nofaith Sep 14, 14:09, 2002 +1 I guess I screwed up - Jersey Girl Sep 15, 01:05, 2002 +1 Re: I guess I screwed up - nofaith Sep 15, 07:46, 2002 An Open Letter on These Definitions - Kevin Sep 20, 03:17, 2002 +2 An Open Answer - Jersey Girl Sep 20, 03:58, 2002 +2 Oh, boo hoo hoo - Martin Sep 20, 11:49, 2002 +1 agnosticism..a wishy washy position - marg Sep 20, 13:38, 2002 +4 Re: agnosticism..a wishy washy position - marg Sep 21, 01:32, 2002 +1 More errors in there, marg! - Martin Sep 21, 21:15, 2002 +1 It's ..so what ..because - marg Sep 26, 03:29, 2002 +2 Re: Your thoughtful post - JAK Sep 26, 12:02, 2002 +1 You are an ignorant, distorting buffoon, JAKass! - Martin Sep 26, 16:32, 2002 wrong, Wrong, WRONG!!! - Martin Sep 26, 16:47, 2002 +1 yes he did - marg Sep 26, 17:11, 2002 +1 NO he did NOT!!!! - Martin Sep 26, 18:44, 2002 +1 that is the atheist position - marg Sep 27, 00:52, 2002 Re: agnosticism..a wishy washy position - JAK Sep 21, 11:21, 2002 +2 Re: agnosticism..a wishy washy position - marg Sep 21, 15:17, 2002 +1 Re: agnosticism..a wishy washy position - JAK Sep 22, 10:54, 2002 +1 Re: agnosticism..a wishy washy position - marg Sep 22, 17:50, 2002 JAK: A wishy washy pseudo-pedant - Martin Sep 21, 17:09, 2002 +1 meaningless post - JAK Sep 24, 08:02, 2002 Tears? Read your little sign - Jersey Girl Sep 21, 12:17, 2002 marg's wishy washy post includes MAJOR errors! - Martin Sep 21, 20:06, 2002 A Sincere Thank You, Marty - Jersey Girl Sep 20, 12:32, 2002 Amen, my brother! Amen!! - Martin Sep 20, 11:37, 2002 all definitions in one post - marg Sep 20, 20:30, 2002

I need emergency help from careful Mormon critics - Martin Sep 13, 10:28, 2002 +26 rise above religion - robin gordon Sep 13, 10:51, 2002 +1 Keep the door open, always open - Jersey Girl Sep 13, 11:14, 2002 +1 Robin made this statement below - Jersey Girl Sep 13, 12:16, 2002 less than 50 characters!! - robin gordon Sep 13, 11:04, 2002 +1 Re: less than 50 characters!! - Jersey Girl Sep 13, 11:52, 2002 One-shot deconversion - Alf Omega Sep 13, 13:06, 2002 +1 Re: One-shot deconversion - Martin Sep 15, 10:52, 2002 Some ideas - nofaith Sep 13, 13:07, 2002 +2 Re: Some ideas - nofaith Sep 13, 14:56, 2002 +1 Nice job, sir - Jersey Girl Sep 15, 10:35, 2002 That's a very good, Dan! It went very well - Martin Sep 15, 10:16, 2002 +3 Re: That's a very good, Dan! It went very well - Grama Jane Sep 15, 13:48, 2002 +1 Re: That's a very good, Dan! It went very well - nofaith Sep 15, 14:22, 2002 Re: That's a very good, Dan! It went very well - nofaith Sep 15, 14:19, 2002 Martin, I'm very happy to hear this! - Kevin Sep 20, 03:57, 2002 Re: I need emergency help from careful Mormon crit - Craig C. Sep 13, 14:09, 2002 I understand your plight - TLC Sep 14, 03:09, 2002 +1 Let us know how it went? (no text) - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:07, 2002 +1 Re: Let us know how it went? - TLC Sep 14, 21:11, 2002 It maybe too late - Nigel Sep 14, 08:48, 2002 +2 Re: It maybe too late - joseph smith Sep 14, 09:28, 2002 +1 What book, Joe? - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 10:49, 2002 Re: It maybe too late - nofaith Sep 14, 14:18, 2002 +1 Re: It maybe too late - joseph smith Sep 16, 05:42, 2002 Dear Martin - Gunnar Sep 19, 15:43, 2002 +1 Second de motion. (no text) - jesse Sep 20, 05:31, 2002

Did Jesus exist? - nofaith Sep 11, 20:02, 2002 +29 Re: Did Jesus exist? - Martin Sep 12, 12:24, 2002 +1 Re: Did Jesus exist? - RC Sep 13, 02:35, 2002 +1 Re: Did Jesus exist? - nofaith Sep 13, 03:30, 2002 +1 Re: Did Jesus exist? - robin gordon Sep 13, 04:56, 2002 +2 Re: Did Jesus exist? - nofaith Sep 13, 06:11, 2002 Re: Did Jesus exist? - Darr Sep 13, 09:18, 2002 +1 Re: Did Jesus exist? - robin gordon Sep 13, 10:27, 2002 gosh- talk about your conspiracy stories! (nt) - robin gordon Sep 13, 04:57, 2002 +1 It is NOT a "conspiracy story"! (no text) - Martin Sep 16, 16:29, 2002 Re: Did Jesus exist? - Paul King Sep 13, 06:57, 2002 +1 Re: Did Jesus exist? - Martin Sep 13, 10:56, 2002 +2 Re: Did Jesus exist? - Paul King Sep 13, 15:26, 2002 Martin, a couple of questions - Glen Sep 14, 05:38, 2002 +3 Re: Martin, a couple of questions - nofaith Sep 14, 07:16, 2002 +3 nofaith - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:27, 2002 +1 Re: nofaith - nofaith Sep 14, 07:41, 2002 +1 Re: nofaith - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:54, 2002 +1 Sorry I jumped - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 08:07, 2002 +1 Re: Sorry I jumped - nofaith Sep 14, 09:31, 2002 Question, Dan - Glen Sep 15, 04:00, 2002 +2 Re: Question, Dan - nofaith Sep 15, 08:24, 2002 Re: Question, Dan - nofaith Sep 15, 08:34, 2002 I can't agree with your conclusions - Martin Sep 15, 19:44, 2002 +1 Re: I can't agree with your conclusions - nofaith Sep 15, 20:22, 2002 +1 Re: I can't agree with your conclusions - Martin Sep 15, 21:00, 2002 +1 Re: I can't agree with your conclusions - nofaith Sep 16, 06:52, 2002 +1 Re: I can't agree with your conclusions - Martin Sep 16, 16:31, 2002 Re: Martin, a couple of questions - Martin Sep 15, 19:41, 2002 Some material may help, Glen - JAK Sep 17, 10:13, 2002

Prospects for Humanity’s Future - Aaron V. Sep 11, 15:43, 2002 +2 Re: Prospects for Humanity’s Future - RC Sep 11, 22:09, 2002 bleak future of space nomads - zip Sep 11, 22:55, 2002

Sept 11 Revisited - Karyn Sep 11, 12:55, 2002 +24 Re: Sept 11 Revisited - Sarahbelle Sep 11, 13:05, 2002 +2 Re: Sept 11 Revisited - JAK Sep 12, 09:09, 2002 Reply to Aaron's post: Aaron is horribly mistaken - Martin Sep 12, 15:35, 2002 I wouldn't be surprised of the results - Aaron V. Sep 11, 15:50, 2002 Re: Sept 11 Revisited - RC Sep 11, 22:01, 2002 +2 On the Dangers of Patriotism - Martin Sep 12, 16:13, 2002 +1 I've read the Book of Mormon many times... - Alf Omega Sep 13, 11:17, 2002 +1 He quotes accurately - Jersey Girl Sep 13, 13:02, 2002 +1 Shakespeare or screenplay - Alf Omega Sep 13, 13:08, 2002 +2 Re: Shakespeare or screenplay - nofaith Sep 13, 13:27, 2002 Re: Shakespeare or screenplay - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 07:14, 2002 +1 Dug this up... - Jersey Girl Sep 14, 12:11, 2002 +1 Re: Dug this up... - Darr Sep 15, 12:55, 2002 +1 So cool, Darr! - Jersey Girl Sep 15, 15:11, 2002 Re: Sept 11 Revisited - Jinxster Sep 12, 20:36, 2002 +1 why dictatorships? - RC Sep 13, 02:49, 2002 Re: Sept 11 Revisited - Karyn Sep 12, 05:49, 2002 +1 Re: Sept 11 Revisited - JAK Sep 12, 09:33, 2002 +1 Re: Sept 11 Revisited - nofaith Sep 12, 10:18, 2002 +1 Re: Sept 11 Revisited - JAK Sep 12, 10:44, 2002 Counterpoint - Martin Sep 12, 15:43, 2002 +1 Re: Counterpoint - Briandc Sep 13, 06:12, 2002 +1 A problem is:How much do we Americans really know? - jesse Sep 14, 05:38, 2002 +1 Re: How much does G.W. Bush know is your question? - JAK Sep 15, 09:46, 2002

When does the 'authority' cease to be 'authority'? - shooter Sep 11, 11:24, 2002 +4 When it goes against offical history - RC Sep 11, 21:48, 2002 Re: When does the 'authority' cease to be.. - Jinxster Sep 12, 19:00, 2002 Authority: a mockery - The Vines Sep 12, 22:42, 2002 +1 Re: Authority: a mockery - Grama Jane Sep 14, 05:49, 2002

restoration? - robin gordon Sep 11, 08:21, 2002 +39 Big questions for a simple forum message to answer - rpcman Sep 11, 10:12, 2002 Re: restoration? - shooter Sep 11, 11:30, 2002 +1 Another point - gunnar Sep 11, 16:42, 2002 +1 Re: Another point - nofaith Sep 11, 19:58, 2002 +3 I don't disagree with the gist of your post. - Gunnar Sep 12, 13:26, 2002 +1 What of the Church of England? - Martin Sep 12, 15:52, 2002 +2 Re: What of the Church of England? - JAK Sep 15, 23:30, 2002 Re: What of the Church of England? - Gunnar Sep 18, 19:33, 2002 Re: Another point - Jinxster Sep 12, 19:30, 2002 +2 Re: Another point - nofaith Sep 13, 02:55, 2002 +1 Re: Certainty of change - JAK Sep 15, 23:56, 2002 Re: Another point - robin gordon Sep 13, 05:13, 2002 Re: Another point - Grama Jane Sep 14, 05:18, 2002 +2 Re: Another point - nofaith Sep 14, 09:39, 2002 +1 Re: Another point - Grama Jane Sep 15, 13:09, 2002 +1 Re: Another point - nofaith Sep 15, 15:24, 2002 Re: Another point - robin gordon Sep 14, 11:05, 2002 +1 Re: Another point - Grama Jane Sep 15, 13:30, 2002 +1 Re: Another point - robin gordon Sep 16, 05:10, 2002 i should clarify....... - robin gordon Sep 11, 20:58, 2002 +3 Re: i should clarify....... - RC Sep 11, 21:40, 2002 +1 Re: i should clarify....... - nofaith Sep 12, 08:48, 2002 The Common Missionary 'Emphasis' - Hard8659 Sep 12, 01:46, 2002 Re: i should clarify....... - robin gordon Sep 12, 09:25, 2002 +1 Re: i should clarify....... - Jinxster Sep 12, 21:23, 2002 +2 Re: i should clarify....... - Hard8659 Sep 13, 03:28, 2002 Re: i should clarify....... - robin gordon Sep 13, 08:01, 2002 Re: restoration? - Jinxster Sep 12, 19:27, 2002 +1 Re: restoration? - robin gordon Sep 13, 02:52, 2002 +1 Re: restoration? - Grama Jane Sep 14, 04:51, 2002 +2 Re: restoration? - robin gordon Sep 14, 11:21, 2002 Re: restoration? - Hard8659 Sep 15, 04:03, 2002 +2 Re: restoration? - Grama Jane Sep 15, 12:50, 2002 +2 Re: restoration? - robin gordon Sep 16, 05:18, 2002 +1 Re: restoration? - Grama Jane Sep 17, 20:46, 2002 On NT churches... what does the bible say? - Hard8659 Sep 17, 03:53, 2002 restoration- not apostacy - robin gordon Sep 16, 05:34, 2002 +1 Absoulutely, Robin... - Hard8659 Sep 17, 03:13, 2002 +1 thanks brett! n/t - robin gordon Sep 17, 11:27, 2002

Agnostic Theism Questions/Perspectives - Jersey Girl Sep 11, 04:13, 2002 +78 Re: Agnostic Theism Questions/Perspectives - diehl Sep 11, 04:26, 2002 +1 Thanks diehl, I'm going to hang back and read - Jersey Girl Sep 11, 04:28, 2002 Re: Agnostic Theism Questions/Perspectives - TLC Sep 11, 05:55, 2002 How do you know what you can and can't know? - Fer-de-lance Sep 11, 13:01, 2002 Agnosticism/Atheism definitions - Kevin Sep 11, 15:33, 2002 +2 Musings on Victoria's specific comments/questions - Kevin Sep 12, 01:06, 2002 +3 Re: Musings - marg Sep 12, 02:31, 2002 +2 Quick 2cents, very quick - Jersey Girl Sep 12, 08:03, 2002 +1 Re: Quick 2cents, very quick - marg Sep 12, 08:50, 2002 +1 Agnosticism and "proof" of God - Martin Sep 12, 14:52, 2002 +1 Re: Agnosticism and "proof" of God - marg Sep 12, 18:03, 2002 +1 Re: Agnosticism and "proof" of God - Martin Sep 12, 18:32, 2002 +1 Re: Agnosticism and "proof" of God - marg Sep 13, 07:07, 2002 +1 That's soft atheism - Martin Sep 16, 10:53, 2002 Re: Musings - Kevin Sep 12, 15:53, 2002 +2 Re: Musings - marg Sep 13, 07:28, 2002 Re: Language - JAK Sep 13, 08:33, 2002 Some further musings on certainty and disbelief - Cal Sep 12, 12:27, 2002 +1 *sigh* I knew I'd get in trouble for this response - Kevin Sep 12, 14:58, 2002 +1 Re: Again Language - JAK Sep 13, 09:00, 2002 Excellent, Kevin! Thank you! - Martin Sep 12, 15:02, 2002 +1 Martin! I'm so glad you joined us! - Kevin Sep 12, 15:37, 2002 +1 Wow! Thanks, Kevin! - Martin Sep 12, 16:17, 2002 Re: Agnosticism/Atheism definitions - nofaith Sep 12, 10:49, 2002 +2 *sigh* - Martin Sep 12, 15:16, 2002 +1 Re: *sigh* - nofaith Sep 12, 18:03, 2002 Proper definitions vs. Popular definitions - Kevin Sep 12, 15:26, 2002 +1 Re: Proper definitions vs. Popular definitions - nofaith Sep 12, 18:27, 2002 +1 I don't know that I'd go so far - Kevin Sep 13, 02:40, 2002 +3 Re: I don't know that I'd go so far - nofaith Sep 13, 03:02, 2002 +1 This is a major complaint by Atheists - Kevin Sep 13, 04:25, 2002 +2 Re: This is a major complaint by Atheists - nofaith Sep 13, 06:54, 2002 Re: This is a major complaint by Atheists - nofaith Sep 13, 08:13, 2002 Re: I don't know that I'd go so far - nofaith Sep 13, 03:05, 2002 Re: I don't know that I'd go so far - nofaith Sep 13, 03:09, 2002 Re: Agnostic Theism Questions/Perspectives - marg Sep 11, 15:52, 2002 A note on the supernatural - Aaron V. Sep 11, 16:17, 2002 Re: Agnostic Theism Questions/Perspectives - JAK Sep 12, 10:25, 2002 +1 Not exactly right, JAK - Jersey Girl Sep 12, 13:45, 2002 Expanding by suggestion - Jersey Girl Sep 12, 12:55, 2002 +2 I'm not at all surprised - marg Sep 12, 14:44, 2002 +1 marg - Jersey Girl Sep 13, 03:10, 2002 +1 vicki - marg Sep 13, 06:44, 2002 +1 Yes marg - Jersey Girl Sep 13, 07:09, 2002 +1 yes please quote..thanks (no text) - marg Sep 13, 07:10, 2002 +1 Okay marg - Jersey Girl Sep 13, 07:13, 2002 +1 Here marg - Jersey Girl Sep 13, 07:17, 2002 +1 yes you did get it wrong. - marg Sep 13, 08:00, 2002 +1 I sure did! - Jersey Girl Sep 13, 08:29, 2002 +1 thank you (no text) - marg Sep 13, 09:35, 2002 +1 You're welcome -