Response for Vicki - nofaith Jun 15, 06:44, 2003 +140 Re: Response for Vicki - Ramona Jun 15, 09:58, 2003 Bear with me while I repost some comments - Victoria! Jun 15, 12:58, 2003 +1 Nature of Christ... - nofaith Jun 15, 17:49, 2003 +1 Re: Nature of Christ...thank you - Victoria! Jun 15, 19:26, 2003 +1 Re: Nature of Christ...thank you (with ref's) - Victoria! Jun 15, 19:55, 2003 +1 Follow up remarks for Dan - Victoria! Jun 16, 01:16, 2003 Mormonism=Christian Cult (making my case) REPOST - Victoria! Jun 15, 13:26, 2003 +1 Mormonism=Christian Cult (making my case) REPOST - JAK Jun 17, 21:54, 2003 God: Mormonism vs Christianity REPOST - Victoria! Jun 15, 13:27, 2003 Christ: Mormonism vs Christianity REPOST - Victoria! Jun 15, 13:29, 2003 Man: Mormonsim vs Christianity REPOST - Victoria! Jun 15, 13:31, 2003 Salvation: Mormonism vs Christianity REPOST - Victoria! Jun 15, 13:32, 2003 Checklist for cults from rpcman's site REPOST - Victoria! Jun 15, 13:34, 2003 Richard Packham's comments rpcman's site REPOST - Victoria! Jun 15, 13:37, 2003 Re: Response for Vicki, Vicki's reply DONE - Victoria! Jun 15, 14:21, 2003 Biblical justifications for a G-d with a body. - Ramona Jun 15, 14:41, 2003 +1 Incorrect - Victoria! Jun 15, 20:07, 2003 +2 Scriptures are incorrect? - Ramona Jun 15, 21:22, 2003 +1 Re: Scriptures are incorrect? - JAK Jun 15, 22:58, 2003 Is Jesus a Spirit? - Craig C. Jun 15, 23:04, 2003 +2 Re: Is Jesus a Spirit? - JAK Jun 15, 23:20, 2003 +1 Re: Is Jesus a Spirit? (JAK) - Victoria! Jun 16, 01:40, 2003 +1 Another side of the fence. LDS aren't christian - Ramona Jun 16, 08:19, 2003 +1 Read that again, Ramona - Victoria! Jun 22, 22:10, 2003 +1 Re: Read that again, Ramona - Ramona Jun 23, 12:24, 2003 +1 Your points - JAK Jun 23, 20:16, 2003 Re: Is Jesus a Spirit? (Craig) - Victoria! Jun 15, 23:36, 2003 +2 Exasperation! - Gunnar Jun 16, 07:45, 2003 +2 Exasperation, but then again - Ramona Jun 16, 11:45, 2003 +2 Re: Exasperation, but then again - nofaith Jun 16, 16:06, 2003 +1 Re: Exasperation, but then again - Ramona Jun 16, 16:39, 2003 +1 I disagree - nofaith Jun 16, 17:27, 2003 +2 Great post, Dan! - Gunnar Jun 17, 02:41, 2003 Re: I disagree - Ramona Jun 17, 11:21, 2003 +1 Re: I disagree - nofaith Jun 17, 18:20, 2003 +1 But there is more in that department - Ramona Jun 21, 10:14, 2003 Re: Exasperation, but then again - Gunnar Jun 17, 03:04, 2003 +1 Re: Exasperation, but then again - Ramona Jun 22, 09:46, 2003 Gunnar? - Victoria! Jun 17, 00:35, 2003 +1 Please don't misunderstand, Vicki. - Gunnar Jun 17, 02:37, 2003 +1 I don't know what to say... - Victoria! Jun 18, 01:36, 2003 +1 Now I do, Gunnar - Victoria! Jun 22, 16:25, 2003 +1 Just a point, Victoria - JAK Jun 22, 21:40, 2003 +1 short reply for the moment - Victoria! Jun 22, 21:53, 2003 +1 Re: Apology & Response - JAK Jun 23, 19:44, 2003 Re: Is Jesus a Spirit? (Craig) - Craig C. Jun 18, 01:03, 2003 +1 Showing you what I mean, Craig - Victoria! Jun 22, 17:26, 2003 +2 Sorry, doesn't cut it. - Craig C. Jun 22, 18:04, 2003 +1 In context this time, Craig - Victoria! Jun 22, 21:42, 2003 +1 scripture interpretation - Craig C. Jun 22, 23:46, 2003 +1 Okay, I'm done - Victoria! Jun 23, 00:34, 2003 +2 Let me offer you this quote - Victoria! Jun 23, 00:46, 2003 +1 Re: Let me offer you this quote - Craig C. Jun 23, 01:16, 2003 +2 Re: Let me offer you this quote - mikwut Jun 23, 12:44, 2003 +3 Re: Let me offer you this quote - Craig C. Jun 23, 13:23, 2003 Too easy - Victoria! Jun 25, 21:27, 2003 +2 Not too easy - Craig C. Jun 26, 01:39, 2003 +1 Interesting - Victoria! Jun 27, 21:19, 2003 +1 Re: Interesting - Craig C. Jun 27, 23:31, 2003 +2 Catholic Encyclopedia:Spiritual Adoption - Victoria! Jun 28, 00:18, 2003 +3 Barbarian or other Catholic? - Victoria! Jun 28, 00:25, 2003 +1 Re: Barbarian or other Catholic? - Martin Jun 28, 08:24, 2003 +2 Re: Barbarian or other Catholic? - Victoria! Jun 28, 19:15, 2003 Re: Martin and Vicki - mikwut Jun 29, 09:37, 2003 +1 Context/Inferior debate tactics - Victoria! Jun 29, 13:18, 2003 +2 Re: Context/Inferior debate tactics - Craig C. Jun 29, 15:45, 2003 +1 Re: Context/Inferior debate tactics - Victoria! Jun 29, 16:32, 2003 +1 Re: Context/Inferior debate tactics - Craig C. Jun 29, 17:53, 2003 +1 Re: Context/Inferior debate tactics - Victoria! Jun 29, 19:13, 2003 +1 "frustrate" is fine ;o) - Craig C. Jun 29, 19:41, 2003 +1 lol - Victoria! Jun 29, 20:46, 2003 Re: Context/Inferior debate tactics - mikwut Jun 30, 11:20, 2003 +1 If I was wrong - Victoria! Jul 01, 02:44, 2003 +1 Re: If I was wrong - mikwut Jul 02, 09:41, 2003 +1 Re: If I was wrong - victoria! Jul 09, 22:31, 2003 Richard Abanes: Catholic /LDS/deification - Victoria! Jun 28, 01:38, 2003 +1 Re: Richard Abanes: Catholic /LDS/deification - Martin Jun 28, 07:30, 2003 +1 Re: Richard Abanes: Catholic /LDS/deification - Victoria! Jun 28, 19:18, 2003 +1 Re: Richard Abanes: Catholic /LDS/deification - Craig C. Jun 28, 19:39, 2003 +1 Re: Richard Abanes: Catholic /LDS/deification - Victoria! Jun 28, 23:06, 2003 Catholic.com - Victoria! Jun 28, 02:10, 2003 GBH explains - Victoria! Jun 28, 02:53, 2003 +1 Re: GBH explains - Martin Jun 28, 08:29, 2003 +1 Re: GBH explains - Craig C. Jun 28, 14:35, 2003 Re: Too easy, no such thing. - mikwut Jun 26, 11:04, 2003 Re: Let me offer you this quote - Ramona Jun 25, 23:13, 2003 +1 Re: Let me offer you this quote - mikwut Jun 27, 13:34, 2003 Gospel Principles (1992) - Victoria! Jun 23, 21:16, 2003 +3 Re: Gospel Principles (1997) - Victoria! Jun 23, 22:20, 2003 +2 Gospel Principles (1997) On Exaltation - Victoria! Jun 23, 22:27, 2003 +1 Your point is? - Craig C. Jun 23, 22:49, 2003 +1 My point is that you - Victoria! Jun 27, 20:55, 2003 +1 Re: My point is that you - Craig C. Jun 27, 23:55, 2003 +1 Stopping this, Craig - Victoria! Jun 28, 03:18, 2003 Re: Gospel Principles (1997) - Craig C. Jun 23, 22:44, 2003 Re: Gospel Principles (1992) - Craig C. Jun 23, 22:42, 2003 Re: Gospel Principles (1992) - nofaith Jun 23, 22:45, 2003 Re: Okay, I'm done - Craig C. Jun 23, 00:58, 2003 +1 Enjoying the particulars of your responses! (no text) - JAK Jun 23, 20:21, 2003 BM God is Spirit? - nofaith Jun 22, 19:19, 2003 +2 Nice explanation of the context (no text) - Craig C. Jun 22, 20:00, 2003 I totally get it now, Dan but - Victoria! Jun 22, 22:16, 2003 +1 Re: I totally get it now, Dan but - nofaith Jun 23, 00:06, 2003 Your insight & further analysis - JAK Jun 15, 22:02, 2003 Re: Response for Vicki - Fer-de-lance Jun 15, 22:40, 2003 +4 Is that what you have to contribute, Fer? - Victoria! Jun 15, 23:28, 2003 Re: Response for Vicki - nofaith Jun 16, 16:21, 2003 +1 Gee thanks, Dan - Victoria! Jun 16, 20:19, 2003 Sorry, Fer, to have doubted you (no text) - nofaith Jun 29, 03:29, 2003 +1 And there's the "gloat" I was waiting... - Victoria! Jun 29, 03:44, 2003 +2 It's too bad you see it that way... - nofaith Jun 29, 03:55, 2003 +1 Great post, Dan! - Victoria! Jun 29, 04:07, 2003 One other thing... - nofaith Jun 29, 04:20, 2003 +1 I don't buy it - Victoria! Jun 29, 04:28, 2003 I'm amazed - Mark Jun 29, 16:17, 2003 +1 Wrong, Mark - Victoria! Jun 29, 16:37, 2003 +1 I never said that - Mark Jun 29, 16:46, 2003 +1 Read on the run - Victoria! Jun 29, 19:11, 2003 Consolidating... - nofaith Jun 16, 16:53, 2003 +1 Re: Consolidating... - Victoria! Jun 16, 19:52, 2003 +1 Re: Consolidating... - nofaith Jun 17, 06:01, 2003 My Opinion - Paul King Jun 17, 03:35, 2003 +2 Re: My Opinion - JAK Jun 17, 22:26, 2003 +1 Re: My Opinion - Paul King Jun 18, 03:25, 2003 In my opinion. . . - Gunnar Jun 18, 02:46, 2003 Still waiting for a response to the following, Vic - nofaith Jun 23, 23:19, 2003 +2 I'm glad I checked back here, Dan! - Victoria! Jun 23, 23:41, 2003 +1 Re: I'm glad I checked back here, Dan! - nofaith Jun 23, 23:51, 2003 +1 I've had an accident, Dan - Victoria! Jun 24, 18:59, 2003 +1 Sorry to hear that - nofaith Jun 24, 22:41, 2003 +1 still reading - Victoria! Jun 25, 01:14, 2003 Response for Dan - Victoria! Jun 25, 19:20, 2003 +1 Re: Response for Dan - nofaith Jun 26, 00:57, 2003 +1 Be done, Danny boy - Victoria! Jun 27, 22:51, 2003 +1 Re: Be done, Danny boy - nofaith Jun 28, 07:02, 2003 +1 Blame it on Jersey - Victoria! Jun 28, 22:51, 2003 +1 Not much of a dancer... - nofaith Jun 29, 01:52, 2003 +1 Well Dan - Victoria! Jun 29, 02:29, 2003 +1 Re: Well Dan - nofaith Jun 29, 02:48, 2003 +1 Forget it, Dan (no text) - Victoria! Jun 29, 03:27, 2003

And you thought the news was all gloom and doom - Another Bob Jun 13, 20:31, 2003

Aids Dissident - Ramona Jun 13, 14:56, 2003 +2 Re: Aids Dissident - [dasi] Jun 13, 17:54, 2003 +1 Re: Aids Dissident - Ramona Jun 13, 21:57, 2003

Response to Ossuary post - Ramona Jun 13, 07:56, 2003 +2 Re: Response to Ossuary post - Martin Jun 17, 06:32, 2003 +1 Re: Response to Ossuary post - Ramona Jun 21, 10:26, 2003

Purported James Ossuary Found to be Fraudulent - Martin Jun 13, 06:58, 2003 +68 Re: Purported James Ossuary Found to be Fraudulent - nofaith Jun 13, 17:22, 2003 +1 Re: Purported James Ossuary Found to be Fraudulent - Martin Jun 17, 03:31, 2003 +1 Re: Purported James Ossuary Found to be Fraudulent - nofaith Jun 17, 05:23, 2003 Re: Purported James Ossuary Found to be Fraudulent - Craig C. Jun 14, 01:15, 2003 +1 I'm honored, Craig - Martin Jun 17, 03:48, 2003 Great Post, Martin! - Gunnar Jun 14, 15:25, 2003 +1 Re: Great Post, Martin! - Martin Jun 17, 04:35, 2003 Dem Bones - Victoria! Jun 14, 17:49, 2003 +1 Re: Dem Bones - Martin Jun 17, 05:36, 2003 +1 For Martin - Victoria! Jun 22, 22:52, 2003 +1 Response - Martin Jun 23, 09:28, 2003 Re: Purported James Ossuary Found to be Fraudulent - Darr Jun 15, 00:46, 2003 +1 High praise, indeed! - Martin Jun 17, 05:48, 2003 Re: Purported James Ossuary Found to be Fraudulent - Paul King Jun 16, 09:20, 2003 +1 Aha! - Martin Jun 17, 05:54, 2003 Additional Link - Martin Jun 17, 06:37, 2003 Re: Purported James Ossuary Found to be Fraudulent - Boll Weevil Jun 17, 12:28, 2003 +1 Absurd statements - Martin Jun 17, 22:09, 2003 +1 Re: Absurd statements - Boll Weevil Jun 17, 23:21, 2003 +1 Huh? Here's some links to follow... - Martin Jun 18, 01:21, 2003 +3 OK, five words on stone - Boll Weevil Jun 18, 09:03, 2003 +1 Re: OK, five words on stone - Martin Jun 19, 07:50, 2003 +1 Re: OK, five words on stone - Boll Weevil Jun 19, 20:05, 2003 +2 And here we have the truth - Darr Jun 21, 04:54, 2003 Leading a self-blinded horse to water - Martin Jun 23, 08:33, 2003 +1 Re: Leading a self-blinded horse to water - Boll Weevil Jun 23, 11:03, 2003 +2 Re: Leading a self-blinded horse to water - Darr Jun 23, 18:13, 2003 +3 Re: Leading a self-blinded horse to water - Craig C. Jun 23, 19:39, 2003 Re: Leading a self-blinded horse to water - Boll Weevil Jun 23, 20:30, 2003 It's lookin' like Darr's gonna win - Mark Jun 25, 16:49, 2003 +1 Re: It's lookin' like Darr's gonna win - Darr Jun 26, 02:19, 2003 Re: Leading a self-blinded horse to water - Martin Jun 23, 22:39, 2003 +1 Re: Leading a self-blinded horse to water - Boll Weevil Jun 24, 16:14, 2003 +2 Boll, here it is - Victoria! Jun 24, 18:56, 2003 Re: Leading a self-blinded horse to water - Martin Jun 25, 05:52, 2003 +1 Re: Leading a self-blinded horse to water - Boll Weevil Jun 25, 12:58, 2003 +4 Sorry for interferring but, - Ramona Jun 25, 15:47, 2003 +3 I think you've missed the point (no text) - Victoria! Jun 25, 19:34, 2003 Sorry, but you're entirely mistaken, Ramona - Martin Jun 26, 04:56, 2003 Re: Sorry for interferring but, - Darr Jun 26, 07:22, 2003 +1 Re: Sorry for interferring but, - Boll Weevil Jun 26, 12:38, 2003 +1 You already HAVE the parallels, BW - Victoria! Jun 26, 19:04, 2003 +1 Re: You already HAVE the parallels, BW - Boll Weevil Jun 26, 20:18, 2003 +1 Yes, and they are in Martin's links - Victoria! Jun 26, 22:17, 2003 Caution little Weevil - Victoria! Jun 25, 19:30, 2003 +1 Re: Caution little Weevil - Boll Weevil Jun 26, 13:08, 2003 +2 Mythical Cartography - Victoria! Jun 26, 18:59, 2003 +2 Re: Mythical Cartography - Boll Weevil Jun 26, 20:34, 2003 +2 Fending off the urge - Victoria! Jun 26, 22:45, 2003 +1 In the interest of saving space and time,BW - Victoria! Jun 27, 13:59, 2003 +1 Re: In the interest of saving space and time,BW - Boll Weevil Jun 30, 10:52, 2003 +1 Billions of people... - Martin Jul 02, 02:41, 2003 Weevil trots out insipid, fallacious "argu... - Martin Jun 27, 01:18, 2003 An impressively reasoned and knowledgeable post! - Martin Jun 26, 23:47, 2003 +1 Light up the applause sign - Victoria! Jun 27, 00:23, 2003 Weevil again proves he's deliberately dishonest! - Martin Jun 26, 23:27, 2003 What a pathetic little coward you are, Weevil! - Martin Jun 26, 05:00, 2003 +1 Re: What a pathetic little coward you are, Weevil! - Boll Weevil Jun 26, 20:41, 2003 +1 What a despicable cheat, chicken, and liar! - Martin Jun 26, 23:01, 2003 Burton Mack - Mark Jun 26, 16:02, 2003 Warning, warning, Will Robinson! - Craig C. Jun 18, 09:50, 2003 +1 I see what you mean! - Martin Jun 19, 07:57, 2003 Re: Huh? Here's some links to follow... - Darr Jun 21, 04:38, 2003 Re: Purported James Ossuary Found to be Fraudulent - Paul King Jun 18, 05:06, 2003 +1 A link from just an hour or so ago - Martin Jun 18, 05:28, 2003 +2 nice job :-) - rdl Jun 18, 14:37, 2003 +1 Re: nice job :-) - Martin Jun 19, 07:54, 2003 A more detailed report - Paul King Jun 19, 09:51, 2003

God's Interests, Boll - Victoria! Jun 12, 23:57, 2003 +1 Re: God's Interests, Boll - Boll Weevil Jun 16, 11:30, 2003

Freemason's Monitor 1802 - dan Jun 11, 10:06, 2003 +2 Re: Freemason's Monitor 1802 - Craig C. Jun 11, 16:10, 2003 +1 Re: Freemason's Monitor 1802 - dan Jun 11, 17:01, 2003

Religion and advertising! - james Jun 11, 00:48, 2003 +2 Re: Religion and advertising! - Artem Jun 11, 01:43, 2003 Re: Religion and advertising! - JAK Jun 12, 19:19, 2003

Jesus' Sacrifice - Artem Jun 10, 19:00, 2003 +9 Re: Jesus' Sacrifice - JAK Jun 10, 20:38, 2003 +1 Re: Jesus' Sacrifice - Artem Jun 10, 23:42, 2003 Getting real... - James Jun 11, 00:37, 2003 +2 Re: Getting real... - Artem Jun 11, 01:53, 2003 +1 logical flaws - james Jun 12, 22:03, 2003 Re: Getting real... - Ramona Jun 11, 11:50, 2003 Re: Jesus' Sacrifice - Boll Weevil Jun 11, 10:08, 2003 +2 Thank you - Artem Jun 11, 11:35, 2003 Re: Jesus' Sacrifice - Ramona Jun 11, 11:57, 2003

The call of the tribe - Craig C. Jun 09, 16:01, 2003 +39 Re: The Tribe - rdl Jun 09, 20:35, 2003 +2 Re: The Tribe - Ramona Jun 09, 20:40, 2003 +1 Re: The Tribe - rdl Jun 09, 20:43, 2003 +1 Re: The Tribe - JAK Jun 09, 22:12, 2003 +1 Yes, I think that's right. (no text) - Craig C. Jun 10, 00:01, 2003 +1 Re: Yes, I think that's right. - JAK Jun 10, 21:05, 2003 +2 Re: Yes, I think that's right. - Craig C. Jun 10, 21:29, 2003 "The best things in life, are not ... - TLC Jun 11, 09:08, 2003 +2 Re: "The best things in life, are not ... - Ramona Jun 11, 15:53, 2003 +1 Re: "The best things in life, are not ... - TLC Jun 11, 16:57, 2003 +1 Re: "The best things in life, are not ... - Ramona Jun 11, 17:59, 2003 chassidic story on aging - Ramona Jun 11, 18:24, 2003 +1 To everything, there is a season. (no text) - TLC Jun 12, 08:55, 2003 +1 Season???? What???? I 'm horrified - Ramona Jun 12, 14:44, 2003 +2 Re: Season???? What???? I 'm horrified - JAK Jun 12, 17:42, 2003 +1 Isn't is disallusioning? - Ramona Jun 12, 19:18, 2003 +1 Assigning Value - JAK Jun 12, 19:31, 2003 +1 Re: Assigning Value - Ramona Jun 12, 20:59, 2003 +1 Re: Assigning Value - JAK Jun 12, 21:34, 2003 Re: Season???? What???? I 'm horrified - TLC Jun 13, 09:03, 2003 +1 Re: Season???? What???? I 'm horrified - Ramona Jun 13, 09:54, 2003 +1 No longer horrified? - TLC Jun 13, 10:48, 2003 +1 Re: No longer horrified? - JAK Jun 13, 16:58, 2003 Re: The Tribe - Craig C. Jun 09, 20:50, 2003 +1 Re: The Tribe - rdl Jun 09, 21:19, 2003 +2 AND the coffee (no text) - JAK Jun 09, 22:06, 2003 Re: The Tribe - Craig C. Jun 09, 23:53, 2003 +1 Re: The Tribe - rdl Jun 10, 08:21, 2003 Life Dance - Victoria! Jun 10, 01:18, 2003 +4 Re: Life Dance - Craig C. Jun 10, 01:34, 2003 +1 Re: Life Dance - Victoria! Jun 10, 20:54, 2003 +1 Life is a dance....... - TLC Jun 11, 10:14, 2003 +1 Re: Life is a dance....... - Victoria! Jun 14, 18:02, 2003 I didn't read it. (no text) - Boll Weevil Jun 10, 02:58, 2003 Re: Life Dance *wipes tear* - rdl Jun 10, 08:25, 2003 +1 Re: Life Dance *wipes tear* - Victoria! Jun 14, 18:05, 2003 Wonderful post, Victoria! - Gunnar Jun 14, 14:52, 2003 +1 Re: Wonderful post, Victoria! - Victoria! Jun 14, 17:38, 2003 Thanks for that Craig! - Gunnar Jun 14, 14:48, 2003

serious , by the way where is Hamelin - johny Jun 08, 21:08, 2003 +10 Re: serious , by the way where is Hamelin - Craig C. Jun 08, 22:47, 2003 +2 Hamelin's mother - Mark Jun 10, 22:11, 2003 +1 Re: Hamelin's mother - Craig C. Jun 10, 23:30, 2003 +2 Re: Hamelin's mother - Paul King Jun 11, 08:16, 2003 Thanks, Craig! - Gunnar Jun 14, 16:15, 2003 That's not accurate, Craig... - Martin Jun 12, 10:29, 2003 +1 My apologies - Craig C. Jun 12, 10:58, 2003 +1 Apologies gladly and wholeheartedly accepted! - Martin Jun 12, 11:41, 2003 Re: serious , by the way where is Hamelin - Fer-de-lance Jun 12, 15:58, 2003 johny? - Victoria! Jun 13, 01:13, 2003

Sealing and adoption - fatherslink Jun 07, 01:44, 2003

Types of punishment - fatherslink Jun 04, 01:12, 2003 +5 Re: Types of punishment - Fer-de-lance Jun 04, 02:06, 2003 +1 Re: Types of punishment - fatherslink Jun 04, 17:55, 2003 +1 Re: Types of punishment - Christopher Jun 04, 19:25, 2003 +1 Re: Types of punishment - fatherslink Jun 05, 01:19, 2003 +1 Re: Types of punishment - Fer-de-lance Jun 05, 16:45, 2003

Shaken. (Terry Gilliam reference inside...) - Lemur-X Jun 03, 20:03, 2003 +9 hey - sansfoy Jun 04, 06:20, 2003 +2 Very fair advice! - Christopher Jun 04, 13:34, 2003 Re: hey - Lemur-X Jun 04, 15:50, 2003 +1 Re: hey - sansfoy Jun 04, 18:26, 2003 +1 Re: hey - Lemur-X Jun 04, 18:40, 2003 Re: Shaken. (Terry Gilliam reference inside...) - johny Jun 08, 21:19, 2003 +1 nah... - sansfoy Jun 09, 08:51, 2003 +1 Re: nah... - Lemur-X Jun 09, 16:15, 2003 +1 your bishop - sansfoy Jun 09, 16:29, 2003

Treatment of immigrants after Sept. 11 - nofaith Jun 03, 01:29, 2003 +6 Re: Treatment of immigrants after Sept. 11 - fatherslink Jun 04, 18:07, 2003 +1 Re: Treatment of immigrants after Sept. 11 - TLC Jun 05, 12:57, 2003 +1 Re: Treatment of immigrants after Sept. 11 - fatherslink Jun 05, 19:02, 2003 +1 Re: Treatment of immigrants after Sept. 11 - nofaith Jun 05, 20:17, 2003 +1 Re: Treatment of immigrants after Sept. 11 - TLC Jun 06, 09:42, 2003 Re: Treatment of immigrants after Sept. 11 - TLC Jun 05, 13:24, 2003

Re: It's a sad world. - Bahman Jun 02, 13:36, 2003 +1 Re: It's a sad world. - Ramona Jun 02, 14:48, 2003 +1 Not always (sad)! - Bahman Jun 02, 15:17, 2003 +1 Re: Not always (sad)! - Ramona Jun 02, 19:12, 2003 What's even more sad - Ramona Jun 02, 15:18, 2003 +1 And that - Ramona Jun 06, 11:49, 2003 Re: It's a sad world. - Karyn Jun 02, 21:41, 2003 +5 Re: It's a sad world. - Christopher Jun 03, 05:04, 2003 It's a sad view of the world, actually - sansfoy Jun 03, 06:17, 2003 Re: It's a sad world. - [dasi] Jun 03, 11:42, 2003 +2 What if the parents are too?!!! (no text) - Bahman Jun 03, 13:36, 2003 +1 Re: What if the parents are too?!!! - Craig C. Jun 03, 14:23, 2003 +1 Really? - Bahman Jun 03, 14:54, 2003 +2 Re: Really? - Artem Jun 03, 14:56, 2003 Probably both! (no text) - Craig C. Jun 03, 16:46, 2003 I wish I had said that (no text) - JAK Jun 03, 17:45, 2003 Karyn - Ramona Jun 03, 14:45, 2003 +1 Re: Karyn - Karyn Jun 10, 00:19, 2003 +3 Re: Karyn - Craig C. Jun 10, 19:55, 2003 Re: Karyn - Ramona Jun 10, 21:31, 2003 Re: Karyn - Darr Jun 10, 21:35, 2003 Re: It's a sad world. - Jaspuh Jun 03, 16:42, 2003 +1 Symbols - JAK Jun 03, 17:49, 2003 +1 Re: Symbols - Ramona Jun 03, 19:00, 2003 +1 Symbols - JAK Jun 03, 20:27, 2003 +1 Symbols - Ramona Jun 03, 21:11, 2003 +1 Symbols - JAK Jun 03, 22:54, 2003 +1 Re: Symbols - Ramona Jun 04, 08:42, 2003 +1 Symbols - JAK Jun 04, 22:37, 2003 I'm sorry, but I have trouble believing you - nofaith Jun 03, 02:59, 2003 +3 Beautifully said - Ramona Jun 03, 14:50, 2003 Well said, Dan - Mark Jun 03, 22:22, 2003 I concur with Ramona and Mark - Gunnar Jun 05, 09:09, 2003

US, Iraq & WMD - Bahman Jun 01, 23:27, 2003 +30 Re: US, Iraq & WMD - Artem Jun 01, 23:39, 2003 +1 O.J. - Bahman Jun 01, 23:56, 2003 +2 What did you learn? (no text) - JAK Jun 02, 00:19, 2003 +2 Things I leaned! - Bahman Jun 02, 01:30, 2003 +1 Other things - Bahman Jun 02, 13:10, 2003 Re: What did you learn? - TLC Jun 02, 09:27, 2003 Re: O.J. - Artem Jun 02, 00:28, 2003 Re: US, Iraq & WMD - JAK Jun 02, 00:15, 2003 +2 Re: US, Iraq & WMD - Bahman Jun 02, 01:19, 2003 Re: US, Iraq & WMD - TLC Jun 02, 09:45, 2003 +2 U.S. as peacemaker - JAK Jun 02, 19:56, 2003 Re: US, Iraq & WMD - nofaith Jun 03, 02:11, 2003 +1 Re: US, Iraq & WMD - JAK Jun 03, 17:21, 2003 +1 Re: US, Iraq & WMD - Another Bob Jun 08, 23:35, 2003 +1 Re: US, Iraq & WMD - JAK Jun 09, 22:56, 2003 Re: US, Iraq & WMD - Lemur-X Jun 03, 17:22, 2003 +2 US, Iraq & WMD - JAK Jun 03, 17:36, 2003 +1 Here's another... - Christopher Jun 04, 19:32, 2003 +1 WMD and our word - JAK Jun 04, 21:40, 2003 Me? - Bahman Jun 03, 20:40, 2003 +1 You? Negatory, Niterider. - Lemur-X Jun 03, 21:00, 2003 +1 Re: You? Negatory, Niterider. - Bahman Jun 03, 22:13, 2003 spin, spin, spin... - Artem Jun 04, 22:07, 2003 +1