Mythical Jesus - A Mythical Idea! - mikwut Dec 14, 01:06, 2002 +61 Evidence is lacking? - mikwut Dec 14, 01:14, 2002 +2 What about Savior myths? - mikwut Dec 14, 01:25, 2002 +3 Re: What about Paul? - mikwut Dec 14, 01:36, 2002 +1 What a load of fatuous sophistry! - Martin Dec 18, 10:22, 2002 Re: What about Savior myths? - Martin Dec 17, 17:03, 2002 Regarding Burkert et al & mikwut's bogus cl... - Martin Dec 17, 18:33, 2002 Legitimate evidence IS completely lacking! - Martin Dec 27, 15:56, 2002 Krishna? - mikwut Dec 14, 01:45, 2002 +2 Relevance of Pre-Christian Myth to Christ Myth - Martin Dec 17, 16:32, 2002 Regarding Krishna's mom & Virgin Births - Martin Dec 18, 09:08, 2002 +1 Re: Regarding Krishna's mom & Virgin Births - mikwut Dec 18, 21:14, 2002 +1 Re: Regarding Krishna's mom & Virgin Births - Martin Dec 19, 19:58, 2002 +1 Re: Regarding Krishna's mom & Virgin Births - mikwut Dec 22, 05:22, 2002 +1 Re: Regarding Krishna's mom & Virgin Births - nofaith Dec 22, 06:01, 2002 +1 Re: Regarding Krishna's mom & Virgin Births - mikwut Dec 22, 12:06, 2002 +1 Regarding Mircea Eliade - Martin Dec 23, 16:28, 2002 Irony - Mormonism and the mythicists. - mikwut Dec 14, 01:48, 2002 +4 The Occult and Joseph Smith (with note links) - Martin Dec 16, 16:14, 2002 +4 Re: The Occult and Joseph Smith - mikwut Dec 18, 20:15, 2002 +1 Re: The Occult and Joseph Smith - Martin Dec 19, 17:50, 2002 Scholarly ReferencesNow Available (mod) - Martin Dec 19, 18:50, 2002 +1 Re: Scholarly References Available - nofaith Dec 20, 05:10, 2002 Lib. Jrnl. Review of Abanes' One Nation Under Gods - Martin Dec 21, 10:59, 2002 +1 Re: Lib. Jrnl. Review of Abanes' One Nation Under - Craig C. Dec 21, 13:02, 2002 +1 I respect your views, but can't agree - Martin Dec 21, 14:10, 2002 +1 Re: I respect your views, but can't agree - Craig C. Dec 22, 13:07, 2002 +2 Re: advice? - rdl Dec 23, 04:23, 2002 +1 Re: advice? - Craig C. Dec 23, 07:52, 2002 +1 thank you - rdl Dec 23, 11:22, 2002 +2 Re: thank you - nofaith Dec 23, 12:07, 2002 Pick me! Pick me! - Jersey Girl! Dec 23, 13:22, 2002 Re: I respect your views, but can't agree - Martin Dec 23, 14:10, 2002 +1 Re: I respect your views, but can't agree - nofaith Dec 23, 14:49, 2002 Re: The Occult and Joseph Smith (with note links) - nofaith Dec 21, 12:32, 2002 +1 Aarrgh! - Martin Dec 21, 14:19, 2002 UNHISTORICAL HISTORY - Martin Dec 20, 11:29, 2002 THINKING IS A SIN - Martin Dec 20, 11:30, 2002 +1 Re: THINKING IS A SIN - OH THE IRONY! - mikwut Dec 20, 21:54, 2002 +1 Blah, blah, blah - Martin Dec 21, 10:32, 2002 *The NOTES are now available again!* - Martin Dec 23, 10:49, 2002 +2 Re: *The NOTES are now available again!* - nofaith Dec 23, 12:13, 2002 Supplement to D&C changes - nofaith Dec 23, 12:49, 2002 The Perfidous Truth-HatingTrickster Returns - Martin Dec 14, 19:01, 2002 +1 Entertaining for sure, but adjectives don't..... - mikwut Dec 14, 21:20, 2002 +1 Mikwut the Perfidous Truth-HatingTrickster Evades - Martin Dec 15, 16:22, 2002 +2 more nasty adjectives with little substance - mikwut Dec 16, 10:11, 2002 +1 More LIES & fatuous nonsense from mukwit... - Martin Dec 16, 13:32, 2002 Re: Mikwut the Perfidous Truth-HatingTrickster Eva - Kyle Dec 26, 02:47, 2002 Re: Mythical Jesus - A Mythical Idea! - nofaith Dec 15, 03:49, 2002 +2 Hungry Are the Damned - Alf Omega Dec 15, 06:36, 2002 +1 lol (no text) - nofaith Dec 15, 06:41, 2002 Re: Mythical Jesus - A Mythical Idea! - mikwut Dec 16, 00:51, 2002 +1 Re: Mythical Jesus - A Mythical Idea! - nofaith Dec 16, 03:07, 2002 (aside mikwut) - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 13:42, 2002 Darr, where do you fall on this issue? (no text) - Fer-de-lance Dec 16, 13:17, 2002 +2 Re: Darr, where do you fall on this issue? - Martin Dec 16, 16:34, 2002 Re: Darr, where do you fall on this issue? - Darr Dec 18, 07:30, 2002 +1 Q for Mikwut - Fer-de-lance Dec 18, 11:02, 2002 +1 Re: Q for Mikwut - mikwut Dec 19, 06:36, 2002 +1 Re: Q for Mikwut - Fer-de-lance Dec 19, 10:47, 2002 The Quest for a Historical Jesus has Failed - Martin Dec 17, 11:48, 2002

Continuing the discussion between Cal and I - Martin Dec 13, 18:03, 2002 +15 Post 1 [Martin] - Martin Dec 13, 18:04, 2002 +2 Post 2&3 [Cal] - Martin Dec 13, 18:08, 2002 +1 Post 4 [Martin] -- Now caught up - Martin Dec 13, 18:09, 2002 +1 Marvelous and Terrible Paul, Again - Cal Dec 14, 12:47, 2002 +1 [ -- Interruption --] - Martin Dec 14, 19:56, 2002 +1 Fine, but don't get lost in the mikwutian mist - Cal Dec 15, 10:31, 2002 +3 here, here - rdl Dec 15, 10:47, 2002 Re: Fine, but don't get lost in the mikwutian mist - mikwut Dec 15, 23:18, 2002 +1 Re: Fine, but don't get lost in the mikwutian mist - Martin Dec 16, 06:41, 2002 I appreciate the assistance - Martin Dec 16, 06:52, 2002 Re: Post 1 [Martin] - grman Dec 13, 20:42, 2002 +1 How?? - Ramona Dec 14, 01:07, 2002 +1 Re: How?? - grman Dec 15, 13:31, 2002 +2 Re: How?? - Ramona Dec 16, 03:17, 2002 and more - Ramona Dec 16, 05:44, 2002

Light years - nat Dec 13, 12:48, 2002 +3 a book you'll love - rpcman Dec 13, 13:03, 2002 Re: Light years - Martin Dec 13, 17:09, 2002 Parallax - The Vines Dec 13, 18:21, 2002

Heavenly Mother - nat Dec 13, 12:21, 2002 +16 Re: Heavenly Mother - Fer-de-lance Dec 13, 16:19, 2002 +1 ???????? (no text) - The Vines Dec 13, 18:25, 2002 +1 Re: ???????? - Fer-de-lance Dec 14, 00:22, 2002 Re: Heavenly Mother - Jrmh Dec 13, 22:25, 2002 Equality/theology - james Dec 14, 09:29, 2002 Catholics - Nik Dec 16, 02:21, 2002 +1 Re: Catholics - Ramona Dec 16, 02:35, 2002 +1 Re: Catholics - Nik Dec 16, 02:53, 2002 +1 Re: Catholics - Ramona Dec 16, 05:30, 2002 +1 Definitions - Nik Dec 17, 02:09, 2002 +1 The problem - Ramona Dec 17, 04:02, 2002 +1 Like I said, never argue about Catholicism! (no text) - Nik Dec 18, 01:50, 2002 +1 But - Ramona Dec 18, 04:43, 2002 +1 See what I mean? (no text) - Nik Dec 18, 04:54, 2002 +1 Re: See what I mean? - Ramona Dec 18, 06:04, 2002 +1 Re: See what I mean? - Nik Dec 19, 03:52, 2002

Bad art, by a child expressing himself - Cal Dec 13, 11:28, 2002 +283 Like Heartsongs - Jersey Girl! Dec 13, 12:07, 2002 +1 Re: Like Heartsongs - Cal Dec 13, 12:39, 2002 +1 It's highly possible I'm a bad poster! - Jersey Girl! Dec 13, 12:54, 2002 +1 *sigh* - Martin Dec 13, 17:18, 2002 +2 Re: *sigh* - Jersey Girl! Dec 14, 09:00, 2002 +2 Please - Cal Dec 14, 13:16, 2002 +1 I resent that, Cal - Jersey Girl! Dec 14, 13:20, 2002 +2 Question, Cal - Jersey Girl! Dec 14, 13:40, 2002 +1 Non sequitur - Cal Dec 14, 14:01, 2002 +1 Re-read my post, it's modified - Jersey Girl! Dec 14, 14:03, 2002 +1 No, I shouldn't be able to do that - Cal Dec 14, 14:12, 2002 +1 Sure, you should - Jersey Girl! Dec 14, 14:17, 2002 +2 But you WERE evading the question! - Martin Dec 14, 20:09, 2002 Help me out here - Cal Dec 15, 07:33, 2002 +1 Cal, I wish - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 08:25, 2002 +1 Re: Cal, I wish - Cal Dec 15, 09:51, 2002 +1 Holding it between the ditches - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 10:08, 2002 +1 Vicki knows nothing but EVASION! - Martin Dec 15, 17:13, 2002 You merely evaded the question again! - Martin Dec 14, 20:03, 2002 +1 Of course you are - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 10:18, 2002 +1 Total bullshit! - Martin Dec 15, 17:15, 2002 It doesn't matter which (no text) - Martin Dec 14, 19:59, 2002 My reply, Martin - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 05:49, 2002 +2 Lots of words but still no answer (no text) - Martin Dec 15, 08:56, 2002 +1 Your post titles are pissing me off - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 09:36, 2002 +1 Your deliberate EVASION is pissing me off - Martin Dec 15, 17:19, 2002 +1 Cool down - grman Dec 15, 20:41, 2002 +1 Knock it off, stupid asshole - Martin Dec 16, 06:58, 2002 What vapid drivel (no text) - Martin Dec 16, 07:13, 2002 I wonder, Cal - Jersey Girl! Dec 13, 12:09, 2002 +3 Re: I wonder, Cal - Martin Dec 13, 17:20, 2002 Re: I wonder, Cal - Artem Dec 13, 20:54, 2002 Some examples - Cal Dec 14, 13:28, 2002 +2 None of the above (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 14, 13:30, 2002 +1 None of the above? - Cal Dec 15, 08:02, 2002 +1 Good grief - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 08:27, 2002 +3 Vicki, do you know how you're coming across? - Martin Dec 15, 09:03, 2002 +1 Do you know how you're coming across? - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 09:42, 2002 +1 You're a despicable evader - Martin Dec 15, 17:23, 2002 +1 A little Kipling for the road - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 06:27, 2002 +1 You didn't answer anything, you liar! - Martin Dec 16, 13:42, 2002 +1 Go down the thread to the bottom, Marty (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 13:47, 2002 What did you mean by your question, then? - Cal Dec 15, 09:35, 2002 +2 Hang back, Cal - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 09:47, 2002 Maintaining - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 10:13, 2002 +1 Then Wagner, Pound, and John were apropos - Cal Dec 15, 11:00, 2002 +1 For the life of me - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 11:10, 2002 +2 And another thing, Cal! - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 11:19, 2002 +2 Don't blame Cal just because you didn't get it. - Fer-de-lance Dec 15, 11:36, 2002 +1 Shut up or I'll block you Fer (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 12:54, 2002 +1 Fer's got it right, actually - Cal Dec 15, 14:10, 2002 +1 I CAN'T BELIEVE - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 14:12, 2002 Egads - Cal Dec 15, 12:23, 2002 +1 Your head on a silver platter - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 12:43, 2002 Looking for nuanced judgments of art? - Cal Dec 15, 11:47, 2002 +1 You are, once again, stating subjective judgements - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 12:03, 2002 Perhaps I could interject... - nofaith Dec 15, 10:28, 2002 +1 Re: Perhaps I could interject... - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 10:33, 2002 +1 Re: Perhaps I could interject... - nofaith Dec 15, 10:43, 2002 +1 We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto! - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 10:51, 2002 +1 HOW DESCPICABLY HYPOCRITICAL! - Martin Dec 16, 07:09, 2002 Great examples! (no text) - Martin Dec 14, 19:57, 2002 (aside Cal) - Jersey Girl! Dec 13, 13:30, 2002 Re: Bad art, by a child expressing himself - Fer-de-lance Dec 13, 16:16, 2002 The Onion (and good satire) is remarkably valuable - Martin Dec 13, 17:23, 2002 From an artist's perspective - The Vines Dec 13, 18:52, 2002 +1 Excellent post, I agree (no text) - Artem Dec 13, 20:57, 2002 Re: Bad art ? - TLC Dec 15, 01:59, 2002 +2 It's a parody (no text) - nofaith Dec 15, 04:00, 2002 +1 A parody of Heart Songs, yes? (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 08:29, 2002 +1 Yep - nofaith Dec 15, 08:54, 2002 +1 Thanks, Dan - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 09:33, 2002 Are you kidding? - Martin Dec 15, 09:15, 2002 +2 Contradictions - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 10:29, 2002 +1 Re: Contradictions - nofaith Dec 15, 10:39, 2002 +2 Thanks for asking! - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 11:04, 2002 +1 Re: Thanks for asking! - nofaith Dec 15, 11:37, 2002 +1 More questions! Thanks! - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 12:29, 2002 +1 Re: More questions! Thanks! - nofaith Dec 15, 14:07, 2002 +3 Re: More questions! Thanks! - Artem Dec 16, 03:21, 2002 Re: More questions! Thanks! - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 04:42, 2002 +1 Re: More questions! Thanks! - nofaith Dec 16, 05:24, 2002 +1 Ahh! - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 05:26, 2002 +1 Re: Ahh! - nofaith Dec 16, 05:53, 2002 +2 Re: Ahh! - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 06:14, 2002 +1 Re: Ahh! - nofaith Dec 16, 06:16, 2002 +1 Re: Ahh! - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 06:29, 2002 FLOWER POWER! - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 09:20, 2002 +1 Re: FLOWER POWER! - nofaith Dec 16, 11:21, 2002 +1 Nail on the head, Dan - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 11:43, 2002 +1 Re: Nail on the head, Dan - Fer-de-lance Dec 16, 12:47, 2002 Artistic talent - Gunnar Dec 16, 12:10, 2002 +1 Re: Artistic talent - nofaith Dec 16, 12:34, 2002 subjectivity - Fer-de-lance Dec 15, 11:06, 2002 +2 (aside question, Fer) - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 11:14, 2002 +1 Re: (aside question, Fer) - Fer-de-lance Dec 15, 11:24, 2002 +1 LOL! - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 11:29, 2002 Re: subjectivity - nofaith Dec 15, 11:51, 2002 +2 hmmm... - Fer-de-lance Dec 15, 12:01, 2002 +1 Re: hmmm... - nofaith Dec 15, 12:05, 2002 +1 Re: hmmm... - Fer-de-lance Dec 15, 12:08, 2002 +1 My choice - Alf Omega Dec 15, 13:06, 2002 +3 Thanks, Alf! (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 13:10, 2002 Re: My choice - TLC Dec 15, 22:29, 2002 +1 yes (no text) - rdl Dec 15, 22:45, 2002 I agree that Jerry Goldsmith is quite good! - Martin Dec 16, 07:26, 2002 +1 Goldsmithography - Alf Omega Dec 16, 08:51, 2002 Re: subjectivity question? - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 12:32, 2002 Oh my Bob, I'm like so totally embarrased ! - TLC Dec 15, 21:19, 2002 Question for Martin - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 11:23, 2002 +2 I didn't realize people wouldn't get it... - nofaith Dec 15, 12:01, 2002 +3 Dan! - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 12:51, 2002 +1 I know... - nofaith Dec 15, 13:23, 2002 +2 You're too generous - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 13:25, 2002 +1 Come on, Vicki - Cal Dec 15, 13:54, 2002 +1 Yup - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 13:59, 2002 +2 Re: Yup - Fer-de-lance Dec 15, 14:11, 2002 ** YOU ARE A LIAR!!! *** - Martin Dec 16, 14:36, 2002 Re: I know... - Martin Dec 16, 16:38, 2002 +1 Re: I know... - nofaith Dec 16, 18:25, 2002 Serious parody - Alf Omega Dec 15, 13:22, 2002 Well, some harm meant . . . - Cal Dec 15, 13:27, 2002 +1 Aren't you clever? (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 13:35, 2002 Re: Question for Martin - Martin Dec 16, 14:29, 2002 Quick comment for Vicki - nofaith Dec 15, 14:28, 2002 +1 Re: Quick comment for Vicki - Jersey Girl! Dec 15, 14:33, 2002 +3 Again, come on, Vicki - Cal Dec 15, 15:31, 2002 +1 Here are your words, Cal - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 02:34, 2002 Re: Quick comment for Vicki - TLC Dec 15, 23:16, 2002 +2 Re: Quick comment for Vicki - Fer-de-lance Dec 16, 02:56, 2002 Thank you, TLC ! - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 05:15, 2002 +3 Wenches R us - Ramona Dec 16, 05:58, 2002 It was absolutely NOT "jerking around"... - Martin Dec 16, 07:20, 2002 +1 I actually believe she didn't think it was satire - Cal Dec 16, 12:15, 2002 +2 I didn't believe it was satire - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 12:32, 2002 Perhaps, but... - Martin Dec 16, 13:48, 2002 How in the world did you miss the satire? - Cal Dec 16, 10:39, 2002 +1 Here are MY words, Cal - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 11:03, 2002 +2 To reiterate - Cal Dec 16, 11:56, 2002 +1 I think I already addressed that - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 12:01, 2002 +3 Re: I think I already addressed that - Fer-de-lance Dec 16, 12:28, 2002 +2 Shut up Fer or I'll block you (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 12:41, 2002 +1 Be my guest. - Fer-de-lance Dec 16, 12:56, 2002 No, Fer - Jersey Girl! Dec 17, 07:13, 2002 I'm not obligated to tell you what's obvious - Cal Dec 16, 12:35, 2002 +2 Re: I'm not obligated to tell you what's obvious - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 12:43, 2002 +1 Sure, evade and deny HERE (no text) - Martin Dec 16, 13:51, 2002 +1 GO to the bottom of the thread (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 13:54, 2002 Following that line of thought - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 12:46, 2002 +2 I don't understand that post (no text) - Cal Dec 16, 13:24, 2002 +1 I'm not sure I did either! - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 13:35, 2002 +2 Does any part of you see - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 13:46, 2002 +2 *** LIAR!! *** - Martin Dec 16, 14:17, 2002 Cal - Jersey Girl! Dec 17, 07:21, 2002 +1 That's enough - Cal Dec 17, 10:11, 2002 *** STOP LYING **** - Martin Dec 16, 13:59, 2002 +1 GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE THREAD (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 14:00, 2002 +1 I already did! (no text) - Martin Dec 16, 14:18, 2002 YOU ARE EVASIONARY!! - Martin Dec 16, 13:54, 2002 +1 GO TO THE BOTTOM - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 13:56, 2002 Another of Vicki's dishonest evasions (no text) - Martin Dec 16, 13:50, 2002 +1 GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE THREAD (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 13:59, 2002 STUPID EVADER!! - Martin Dec 16, 14:38, 2002 If your time is so "limited"... - Martin Dec 16, 14:23, 2002 bad art - grendel Dec 15, 17:54, 2002 +1 Re: bad art - JAK Dec 17, 10:01, 2002 +1 Re: bad art - grendel Dec 19, 04:58, 2002 +1 Re: bad art - JAK Dec 19, 08:56, 2002 Oh my goodness!!! - rdl Dec 15, 22:43, 2002 WHOA THAT, MARTY - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 11:32, 2002 +2 STOW THAT BULLSHIT, VICKI! - Martin Dec 16, 14:06, 2002 +1 I answered your question in the post above here - Jersey Girl! Dec 16, 14:24, 2002 +1 YOU DID NOT! - Martin Dec 16, 14:46, 2002 +1 ONE TIME - Jersey Girl! Dec 17, 05:07, 2002 +2 Art-questions - JAK Dec 17, 09:45, 2002 +2 Art-answer - Jersey Girl! Dec 17, 11:38, 2002 +3 Vicki did NOT remain on topic! - Martin Dec 17, 12:45, 2002 +1 This is what I actually said, Martin - Jersey Girl! Dec 18, 04:14, 2002 +2 The topic is art, stay on topic (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 18, 04:16, 2002 +1 Art - JAK Dec 18, 08:20, 2002 +1 No definitions are needed! (modified) - Martin Dec 18, 09:24, 2002 +2 A different view - JAK Dec 18, 10:13, 2002 +2 Re: A different view (modified) - Martin Dec 18, 10:53, 2002 +1 Analysis of communication difficulties - JAK Dec 18, 21:10, 2002 Define it, or you can't talk about it - Cal Dec 18, 11:46, 2002 +1 Understood definitions improve understanding - JAK Dec 19, 08:43, 2002 +1 JAK never improves ANYTHING - Martin Dec 20, 11:57, 2002 Re: No definitions are needed! (modified) - grendel Dec 19, 05:25, 2002 +2 Re: No definitions are needed! (modified) - JAK Dec 19, 09:06, 2002 Re: No definitions are needed! (modified) - Martin Dec 19, 12:13, 2002 +1 Re: No definitions are needed! (modified) - grendel Dec 20, 16:51, 2002 Baloney! - Martin Dec 18, 08:06, 2002 have not looked, yet (no text) - JAK Dec 18, 04:31, 2002 Re: Art-answer - JAK Dec 18, 05:00, 2002 +2 Suicide and art. - Ramona Dec 18, 05:50, 2002 +1 Re: The heart and art - JAK Dec 18, 07:20, 2002 +1 It's simply bad art or not art at all. - Ramona Dec 18, 23:21, 2002 +1 Re: It's simply bad art or not art at all. - JAK Dec 19, 07:15, 2002 +1 JAK the Perverted Dictionary Fondler - Martin Dec 19, 12:26, 2002 +2 Is Britney Spears a "good" or "b... - Jersey Girl! Dec 19, 13:00, 2002 +2 Clarification - nofaith Dec 19, 14:58, 2002 Is Britney Spears a "good" or "b... - JAK Dec 20, 06:44, 2002 The Art of the Pissing Contest - Jersey Girl! Dec 19, 13:28, 2002 +1 When you admit you were wrong... - Martin Dec 19, 17:18, 2002 +1 You obviously misread me - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 07:47, 2002 +1 When you admit you were wrong... - Martin Dec 20, 11:32, 2002 +1 I already addressed this post above (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 12:02, 2002 +1 When you admit you were wrong... - Martin Dec 20, 12:06, 2002 No definitions are needed! - Martin Dec 18, 09:28, 2002 +1 I commented when you posted this the first time (no text) - JAK Dec 18, 11:04, 2002 Re: Art-questions - Martin Dec 17, 12:42, 2002 Re: ONE TIME - Martin Dec 17, 12:32, 2002 +1 "good" or "bad" - Jersey Girl! Dec 17, 12:36, 2002 +1 Re: "good" or "bad" - Martin Dec 17, 12:52, 2002 +1 I asked... - Jersey Girl! Dec 17, 12:56, 2002 +1 You are completely and totally WRONG - Martin Dec 17, 13:34, 2002 +1 This isn't a dialogue - Jersey Girl! Dec 18, 04:03, 2002 +2 Evaluating art - JAK Dec 18, 07:59, 2002 +2 Re: Evaluating art - Martin Dec 18, 08:24, 2002 +1 Re: Evaluating art - JAK Dec 18, 10:59, 2002 +1 Re: Evaluating art - Martin Dec 18, 11:14, 2002 +1 Re: Evaluating art - JAK Dec 18, 21:44, 2002 You're probably right - Jersey Girl! Dec 18, 10:12, 2002 +3 Re: You're probably right - JAK Dec 18, 10:25, 2002 I'll take "music" for 20$ Alex - Jersey Girl! Dec 18, 10:43, 2002 +1 Nothing about art is entirely subjective!! - Martin Dec 18, 11:03, 2002 +1 Point of agreement, Martin - Jersey Girl! Dec 19, 05:50, 2002 +4 bad v. good - Ramona Dec 19, 07:01, 2002 +1 Re: "Confusion" - JAK Dec 19, 08:49, 2002 +1 Only JAK's confused! - Martin Dec 19, 12:36, 2002 +1 I'm definitely confused - Jersey Girl! Dec 19, 12:48, 2002 +2 Speak the truth - Martin Dec 19, 17:29, 2002 Less confused than you think - JAK Dec 19, 21:31, 2002 +1 Yes, I'm not confused at all - Martin Dec 20, 12:02, 2002 +1 You read poorly - JAK Dec 21, 07:50, 2002 +1 Same old fatuous pseudo-pedant JAK (no text) - Martin Dec 21, 12:22, 2002 Re: The individual - JAK Dec 20, 06:54, 2002 +1 Gag me with a freaking Ag spoon - Ramona Dec 20, 07:15, 2002 Martin, you didn't reply to - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 11:04, 2002 You are merely evading the REAL issue! (no text) - Martin Dec 20, 11:45, 2002 +1 Re: You are merely evading the REAL issue! - Martin Dec 20, 11:46, 2002 +1 Accusations are not a reply - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 11:58, 2002 +1 You are merely evading the REAL issue! - Martin Dec 20, 12:04, 2002 +1 You are evading on topic replies to my posts (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 12:06, 2002 +2 You are merely evading the REAL issue! - Martin Dec 20, 12:07, 2002 I see you're blocking me again - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 12:14, 2002 He's not (no text) - Martin Dec 18, 10:58, 2002 Re: This isn't a dialogue - Martin Dec 18, 08:16, 2002 +1 Back up - Jersey Girl! Dec 19, 04:26, 2002 +1 Re: Back up - Martin Dec 19, 12:30, 2002 +1 Disagreeing isn't "LYING" - Jersey Girl! Dec 19, 12:43, 2002 +2 Re: Disagreeing isn't "LYING" - Martin Dec 19, 17:21, 2002 +1 I disagree - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 08:06, 2002 +2 Face it Vicki - Ramona Dec 20, 09:02, 2002 +1 Re: Face it Vicki - JAK Dec 20, 10:01, 2002 You're just lying and evading still - Martin Dec 20, 11:42, 2002 +1 That's twisted "reasoning" - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 11:55, 2002 +1 You wouldn't know reason if it bit you - Martin Dec 20, 12:00, 2002 +1 You already posted this post (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 12:03, 2002 Re: Disagreeing isn't "LYING" - JAK Dec 20, 05:45, 2002 +1 You're a pseudo-pedantic buffoon, JAK - Martin Dec 20, 11:44, 2002 +1 YOU misdirected the entire thread, Martin! (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 12:01, 2002 +1 YOU are a contemptible fraud and LIAR (no text) - Martin Dec 20, 12:05, 2002 +1 You're an off topic, attacking thread glutton (no text) - Jersey Girl! Dec 20, 12:07, 2002 Re: WHOA THAT, MARTY - nofaith Dec 16, 18:46, 2002 +1 Re: WHOA THAT, MARTY - Jersey Girl! Dec 17, 07:05, 2002 DEFENDING CAL'S OPENING POST! - Martin Dec 16, 14:13, 2002 Original -   Dec 17, 11:41, 2002 +1 Enough - Cal Dec 17, 11:41, 2002 +1 Yes it is - Jersey Girl! Dec 17, 12:20, 2002 Closing Words - Martin Dec 20, 18:15, 2002 The Resurrection of Vicki! - Jersey Girl! Dec 21, 13:36, 2002 +2 And blocking - JAK Dec 21, 22:25, 2002 +2 Hilarious! - Martin Dec 22, 09:04, 2002 Pete's Sakes, Martin - Jersey Girl! Dec 22, 10:01, 2002